Download (1660Kb) - OAR@ICRISAT

5. Qualitative Parameters of Impacts
i. Functioning of village level
institutions
Describe:
ii. Records of meetings
properly updated
iii. Liaison with scientific
institutions established
iv. Watershed Development
Fund collected? and its
utilization
No. of UGs No. of SHGs WC members :11
Before After Before After Male:11
8 Female: 0
Records verified & audited
Chairman, President & secretaries visited CRIDA,
Hyderabad and some farmers visited KVK, Madnapur
WDF of Rs. 3,00,000 was collected from the beneficiaries
and deposited in the Bank A/c of Watershed Association,
at present account balance of Rs. 80,000/- is available.
v. Self-Help Groups No: Revolving fund: Rs.
V.O functioning:
Utilization of loans:
Bank linkages established:
vi. Planned CPRs sustainable &
equitable development
vii. Benefits to weaker sections
(women, dalits & landless)
Savings:
6. Quantitative Parameters of Impacts
i. Improvements in water
table/ water availability
ii. Additional area under
cultivation/horticulture/
Afforestation
iii. Changes in cropping
pattern and intensity
iv. Changes in agricultural
productivity
v. Changes in fodder & fuel
wood availability
vi. Changes in size & character
of livestock holdings
vii. Status of grazing land &
their carrying capacity
viii. Employment generated
due to implementation of
project
ix. Change in household
category, total & source
Change in GWL & availability can not be attributed to
watershed development as Koilsagar irrigation dam was
constructed submerging some part of the watershed and
storing water in the reservoir.
No additional area brought into cultivation, bunding was
done in the watershed area.
28