Download (1660Kb) - OAR@ICRISAT

x. Freedom from debt and
reduction in degree of
dependence of money
lenders (case studies)
xi. Reduction in out-migration
(case studies)
xii. Reduction in drought
vulnerability of the
watershed
xiii. Detailed case studies of
specific farmers impacted
by the project
xiv. Photographs showing work
+ its impact
7. Learnings and process documentation (how the program could be implemented better;
constraints, improvements possible, changes made etc.)
8. Observations and Comments by Evaluators:
Sweet oranges which were planted under horticulture improvement during watershed
development has been up rooted due to non-availability of water as indicated by some
farmers. However, some farmers contradicted and told that poor growth of low quality
plants and lower price of sweet oranges were main reasons than non-availability of
water per se.
Relevance of the location for the structure is fair which has taken consideration of
technical inputs. Physical measurements are matching with M book and Quality of the
work is fair. Maintenance of the structures is poor after the watershed project was
completed.
After the flash floods in Mahabubnagar, watershed structures in Eklaspur got breached,
damaged and silted up.
40