Download PDF [10.9 MB] - Flight Safety Foundation
Download PDF [10.9 MB] - Flight Safety Foundation
Download PDF [10.9 MB] - Flight Safety Foundation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FLIGHTTRAINING<br />
Conceptual Model of Threat, Appraisal and Information Processing<br />
Ignore<br />
OR<br />
Benign Positive<br />
or Irrelevant<br />
Assign Attentional<br />
Resources<br />
Perception<br />
Normal Information<br />
Processing<br />
brain. 18,19 This fact is clearly advantageous<br />
in situations when immediate<br />
action is required but may induce a<br />
pathological acute stress reaction that is<br />
unwarranted.<br />
If they appraise their situation as<br />
threatening, humans involuntarily<br />
will apply some form of unconscious<br />
emotional homeostatic (stress-<br />
relieving) coping or conscious defense<br />
mechanism. This may take the form<br />
of trying to fix the problem. That is an<br />
entirely appropriate method, which<br />
is employed by most pilots in most<br />
situations. If no immediate fix is at<br />
hand, however, or the situation is appraised<br />
as being overwhelming, then<br />
the possibility exists that some form of<br />
emotionally focused coping mechanism<br />
will be employed.<br />
Emotionally focused coping, however,<br />
is largely pathological and may<br />
include elements such as avoidance,<br />
Environmental Event<br />
Primary Appraisal<br />
Problem Focused<br />
Loss/Harm<br />
Threat/ Challenge<br />
Secondary Appraisal<br />
Defense or Coping<br />
Mechanism Employed<br />
denial, self-deception or reality distortion.<br />
17,20,21 These coping mechanisms can<br />
have severe effects on the constructive<br />
processing of information, problem solving<br />
and decision making. In the aviation<br />
context, this is very problematic in critical<br />
situations. One useful conceptual model<br />
(Figure 1) illustrates this flow of threat,<br />
appraisal and information processing. 22<br />
Startle<br />
The startle reflex is a normal and<br />
universal human response to some unexpected/surprising<br />
stimulus. When a<br />
person appraises the stimulus as threatening,<br />
activation of the sympathetic<br />
nervous system triggers widespread and<br />
rapid changes in the body. This arousal,<br />
which is also associated with the acute<br />
stress reaction, is generally known as<br />
the fight or flight response and has been<br />
shown to have significant effects on<br />
cognitive and psychomotor processes.<br />
Emotion Focused<br />
Attentional Channeling<br />
Perception<br />
Degraded Information<br />
Processing<br />
Reappraisal<br />
Note: When pilots appraise a situation as overwhelmingly threatening, there is a possibility that an emotion-focused coping method — largely negative/<br />
pathological in its effect — will interfere severely with their information processing, problem solving and decision making.<br />
Source: Wayne Martin, Patrick Murray and Paul Bates<br />
Figure 1<br />
The startle reflex invokes a pattern<br />
of aversive movement (that is, away<br />
from the stimulus) and aligns attentional<br />
resources to the source of the<br />
stimulus. This process is remarkably<br />
fast, with first signs of reaction occurring<br />
in as little as 14 milliseconds<br />
(ms) in some tests on humans. 26,27<br />
Given that cognitive processing of<br />
new stimuli takes more than 500<br />
ms, 28 that “quick and dirty” reflexive<br />
reaction is clearly an innate process<br />
for avoiding harm.<br />
The brain’s amygdala region, which<br />
is strongly associated with emotional<br />
memory of fear, appears to be where<br />
initial appraisal of threat is made. Projections<br />
from the amygdala then initiate<br />
the startle reflex and, if the threat<br />
persists, the full startle or surprise reaction.<br />
7,8 Essentially, this is still the fight<br />
or flight response, the same process<br />
invoked during acute stress reactions.<br />
30 | FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION | AEROSAFETYWORLD | MAY 2013