30.07.2013 Views

Download PDF [10.9 MB] - Flight Safety Foundation

Download PDF [10.9 MB] - Flight Safety Foundation

Download PDF [10.9 MB] - Flight Safety Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

‘Hazardous Proximity’<br />

An airliner on go-around and a business jet on departure<br />

came close together in an airport hot spot.<br />

BY MARK LACAGNINA<br />

FLIGHTSAFETY.ORG | AEROSAFETYWORLD | MAY 2013<br />

ONRECORD<br />

The following information provides an awareness of problems that might be avoided in the future. The information<br />

is based on final reports by official investigative authorities on aircraft accidents and incidents.<br />

JETS<br />

Late Go-Around Cited<br />

Airbus A320, Bombardier Learjet 60. No damage. No injuries.<br />

The absence of air traffic control (ATC)<br />

procedures ensuring separation between<br />

aircraft going around from one runway<br />

and entering the flight path of aircraft departing<br />

from a different runway contributed to an<br />

incident that placed the A320 and the Learjet in<br />

“hazardous proximity” at Las Vegas McCarran<br />

International Airport in Nevada, said the U.S.<br />

National Transportation <strong>Safety</strong> Board (NTSB).<br />

“The closest proximity of the two aircraft<br />

was approximately 0.3 nm [0.6 km] laterally and<br />

100 ft [30 m] vertically,” said the NTSB’s final<br />

report on the near midair collision, which occurred<br />

at 1225 local time on April 26, 2012.<br />

The A320 was inbound to Las Vegas on a<br />

scheduled passenger flight from Boston, Massachusetts,<br />

and the Learjet, of Mexican registration,<br />

was departing from McCarran. The report did<br />

not specify the Learjet’s destination or how many<br />

people were aboard either of the two aircraft.<br />

Day visual meteorological conditions (VMC)<br />

prevailed, with winds from the south at 19 kt,<br />

gusting to 26 kt. McCarran has two sets of parallel<br />

runways. Aircraft operations on Runways 25L<br />

and 25R, located on the south side of the airport,<br />

were being coordinated by a controller at the “local<br />

control 1” (LC1) position; operations on Runways<br />

19L and 19R, on the west side of the field,<br />

were being coordinated by a different controller<br />

at the “local control 2” (LC2) position.<br />

The A320 crew was conducting a visual<br />

approach to Runway 25L and had been cleared<br />

to land by the LC1 controller. Shortly thereafter,<br />

the Learjet crew was cleared for takeoff from<br />

Runway 19L by the LC2 controller.<br />

The departure thresholds of the runways are<br />

about 1,600 ft (488 m) apart. “The two runways<br />

do not physically intersect,” the report said.<br />

“However, the flight paths of the runways intersect<br />

approximately 0.32 nautical miles [0.59 km]<br />

past the departure end of Runway 19L.” Runway<br />

25L is 10,526 ft (3,208 m) long, and Runway 19L<br />

is 9,775 ft (2,979 m) long.<br />

The A320 was about one-third of the way<br />

down Runway 25L when the crew reported that<br />

they were going around. The LC1 controller<br />

acknowledged, saying in part: “Roger, on the<br />

go, and traffic will be at your two o’clock and<br />

one mile, a Learjet.” The controller also shouted<br />

“go around,” a normal practice to alert the other<br />

controllers on duty in the tower cab that a goaround<br />

was in progress.<br />

| 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!