Download PDF [10.9 MB] - Flight Safety Foundation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ICAO Regional Runway Safety Seminar - Antigua http://www.icao.int/Meetings/AntiguaRRSS/Pages/default.aspx The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), in partnership with the Eastern Caribbean Civil Aviation Authority (ECCAA), the Organization of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS), Flight Safety Foundation (FSF) and the International Federation of Air Line Pilots Association (IFALPA), invites its Member States, participants, sponsors and exhibitors to the North American, Central American and Caribbean Regional Runway Safety Seminar – St John’s, Antigua and Barbuda. ICAO and its Runway Safety Partners are committed to presenting Regional Runway Safety Seminars (RRSSs) (RR across the globe over the next two years to promote the establishment of Runway Safety Teams (RSTs) as a means of addressing runway safety issues. Be part of an important regional event that will bring together experts from diverse professional domains to promote a multidisciplinary approach to improving runway safety outcomes in North America, Central America and the Caribbean. Learn About • the benefits of establishing Runway Safety Teams (RSTs) and how they work • identification of runway safety hazards • different mitigation strategies available • regionally relevant issues and how they have been or could be addressed • regional support for RSTs Who Should Attend • Regulators • Aircraft operators and pilots • Air navigation service providers and ATCs • Aerodrome operators • Aircraft manufacturers • Other aviation professionals interested in improving runway safety Hosted in Collaboration With: 27-29 MAY 2013 SCAN ME FOR MORE INFO For more information about this event contact Elizabeth Gnehm at EGnehm@icao.int.
Challenging encounters with strong gusty crosswinds during the approach and landing phase in commercial air transport — never routine for flight crews and sometimes underestimated by air traffic control (ATC) — involve some risk because of systemic gaps, mismatches and misconceptions, says Gerard van Es, senior consultant for flight operations and flight safety, National Aerospace Laboratory Netherlands (NLR). He explained the impetus for further study of the factors involved and a few of NLR’s recently developed recommendations during Flight Safety FLIGHTSAFETY.ORG | AEROSAFETYWORLD | MAY 2013 Foundation’s International Air Safety Seminar in Santiago, Chile, in October 2012. In April, van Es updated Aero- Safety World about industry responses to the complete report that he and a colleague, Emmanuel Isambert, prepared as advisers to the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). 1 Difficult surface wind conditions 2 have confronted pilots since the flights of Wilbur and Orville Wright, and one of the many recent examples was a serious incident in Germany in 2008 (see “Serious Incident in 2008 Prompted German and EASA Analyses,” p. 41) that motivated German accident THREATANALYSIS investigators, and subsequently EASA, to dig deeper into the causal factors and to update mitigations. A German recommendation — calling for assessment of all measuring systems that detect the presence of near-surface gusts and how pilots integrate various wind data into landing/go-around decisions — led to the NLR study for EASA, van Es said. Crosswind-related regulations originated in a period from a few years after World War II to 1978, when demonstrated crosswind in airworthinesscertification regulations became fixed for industry use, van Es said. 3 Strong BY WAYNE ROSENKRANS Gusty Crosswinds Two focused studies challenge today’s variations in airline practices and flight crew decision making. © Daan Krans/AirTeamImages | 39
Page 1 and 2: AeroSafety WORLD BRAKING ACTION ON
Page 3 and 4: SETBACK IN Nigeria By now you may h
Page 5 and 6: 45 Data Link | Canadian Runway Incu
Page 7 and 8: Next month, I am scheduled to give
Page 9 and 10: Wayne Rosenkrans A few months ago I
Page 11 and 12: INBRIEF ‘Monitoring Matters’ Th
Page 13 and 14: A Lion Air Boeing 737-800 sits in s
Page 15 and 16: was based on using the aircraft its
Page 17 and 18: Satellite photo of Guatemala Airpor
Page 19 and 20: It may take hours for your aircraft
Page 21 and 22: measured and estimated runway frict
Page 23 and 24: snow and rain accumulating frozen m
Page 25 and 26: © Draganfly Innovations Civil avia
Page 27 and 28: © Scheibel another of the states s
Page 29 and 30: I work hard to convince our busines
Page 31 and 32: development of interventions suitab
Page 33 and 34: The rapid changes in the body’s s
Page 35 and 36: In summary, if a critical situation
Page 37 and 38: U.K. Air Accidents Investigation Br
Page 39: says. “As with the aeroplane wing
Page 43 and 44: German Federal Bureau of Aircraft A
Page 45 and 46: values] went all over the place unt
Page 47 and 48: BY RICK DARBY Canadian Sum Set Cana
Page 49 and 50: from 10 to 6, and “undetermined
Page 51 and 52: Therefore, it requires us to stay a
Page 53 and 54: The rule illustrates the negative s
Page 55 and 56: ‘Hazardous Proximity’ An airlin
Page 57 and 58: land at the airport the afternoon o
Page 59 and 60: mechanical resistance. The first of
Page 61 and 62: FLIGHTSAFETY.ORG | AEROSAFETYWORLD
Page 63: MULTIPLE AVIATION INDUSTRY SEGMENTS

Download PDF [10.9 MB] - Flight Safety Foundation

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?