30.07.2013 Views

final .cdr

final .cdr

final .cdr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mahendra Kumar BJ et al Assessment and evaluation of drug information services provided by the Clinical Pharmcists in a rural tertiary care<br />

Teaching Hospital of South India<br />

Table 2: Frequency of resources used for provision of queries<br />

Sl. No References Frequency of<br />

Usage<br />

1. Micromedex Health Care Series.(Database) 38<br />

th<br />

2. Pharmacotherapy hand book. J.T. Dipiro. 6 Edition. 01<br />

3. AHFS Drug Information 2001. 08<br />

4. a. IDR, b. ADR and c. CIMS 02<br />

nd<br />

5. Martindale The Complete Drug reference. 32 edition. 13<br />

6. Text book of toxicology. VV Pillay 01<br />

nd<br />

7. WHO Guidelines for treatment of Malaria. 2 ed 01<br />

8. Text book of Pharmacology. KD Tripathi 01<br />

9. Elements of Pharmacology .TP Gandhi 01<br />

10. Applied Therapeutics, the clinical use of drugs. Koda – Kimble 01<br />

th<br />

11. Antibiotics and chemotherapy 8 ed. Roger Daniel 01<br />

12. Drug information hand book 04<br />

13. Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics. Roger walker 03<br />

14. Indian pediatrics. Vol. 45 01<br />

15. Pharmaceutical Press journal 01<br />

16. Poison Index ( Manipal ) 06<br />

th<br />

17. Text book of Therapeutics, drug and disease management, 7 ed. Herfindal 01<br />

18. Mosby ’ s Medical Drug Reference. 1999 - 2000 01<br />

19. Internet 18<br />

20. Others 04<br />

established in the hospital and 42 (46.6%) of them knew<br />

about the services provided by the Clinical Pharmacy<br />

department, only 26 (28.8%) of the respondents utilized the<br />

DIC, and 22 (24.4%) were aware of the online DIC existing<br />

in the hospital.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Among the 81 queries received during the study period, a<br />

great number were from general medicine department. The<br />

reason may be that the faculty and the students from Clinical<br />

Pharmacy department were attending the ward rounds for<br />

longer durations and also the usage of great number of<br />

drugs in general medicine department that becomes<br />

necessary for the need of unbiased drug information.<br />

Medical post graduate students had more queries than the<br />

clinicians, interns and pharmacists which show that they are<br />

more oriented towards updating of their knowledge<br />

regarding the drugs. More number of queries were received<br />

by direct access and ward rounds which shows that the DIC<br />

is closely associated with all the health care professionals and<br />

DIC is easily feasible from all the wards in the hospital and<br />

clinicians are accepting the services provided by the DIC<br />

and also this may be because of availability of clinical<br />

pharmacist at the time of prescribing or personal contacts.<br />

29<br />

Table 3: Feedback details on drug information services<br />

from doctors. (n=90)<br />

Obstetrics and<br />

Gynecology 22<br />

Medicine 18<br />

Departments<br />

Pediatrics<br />

Dermatology<br />

07<br />

04<br />

Orthopedics 11<br />

Surgery 17<br />

Anesthesia 11<br />

Professors 05<br />

Associate professors 04<br />

Assistant professors 17<br />

Lecturers 01<br />

Post graduates 10<br />

Interns 22<br />

Position<br />

Physician<br />

Majority of the queries were related to dosage and<br />

administration of drugs and contraindications. This may be<br />

because of updating the drug monographs, non availability<br />

of information, not studied in their curriculum, advanced<br />

change of the drug response, new informations added to the<br />

drug monographs as and when it is required.<br />

RJPS, Apr-Jun, 2011/ Vol 1/ Issue 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!