01.08.2013 Views

Development of a Liquid Scintillator and of Data ... - Borexino - Infn

Development of a Liquid Scintillator and of Data ... - Borexino - Infn

Development of a Liquid Scintillator and of Data ... - Borexino - Infn

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Summary <strong>and</strong> Outlook<br />

possible to distinguish clearly between the different currently allowed oscillation scenarios.<br />

The LENS experiment aims at a real-time charged current detection <strong>of</strong> the Be <strong>and</strong>, eventually<br />

the pp neutrinos. By measuring the CC <strong>and</strong> the neutrino-electron scattering (CC + NC)<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> the Be neutrinos, their total flux can be determined <strong>and</strong> compared with solar model<br />

predictions. The comparison <strong>of</strong> the results from BOREXINO <strong>and</strong> LENS can then give an unambiguous<br />

pro<strong>of</strong> for oscillations <strong>of</strong> the Be neutrinos.<br />

The identification <strong>of</strong> the neutrino signal in BOREXINO relies on the distinction <strong>of</strong> a Comptonlike<br />

edge in the electron energy spectrum, due to the monoenergetic (862 keV) Be neutrinos<br />

scattered <strong>of</strong>f electrons. Since the neutrino signal does not have any event-by-event signature,<br />

reduction <strong>and</strong> rejection <strong>of</strong> the background signals from radioactive decays are essential. As<br />

the expected signal rate in BOREXINO is less than ÓÙÒØ× ØÓÒ ¡ Ý in the energy range<br />

from 0.25 - 0.8 MeV, the requirements on the radiopurity <strong>of</strong> the detector components are extremely<br />

challenging: for the liquid scintillator, a maximum concentration <strong>of</strong> U <strong>and</strong> Th<br />

<strong>of</strong> g/g <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> K<strong>of</strong> g/g is allowed in order to achieve a signal/background ratio<br />

even in the case <strong>of</strong> total conversion <strong>of</strong> into . The necessary background suppression<br />

can be achieved only if a large fraction <strong>of</strong> the background events can be rejected by their pulse<br />

shape characteristics (alpha decays) <strong>and</strong> by spatial cuts (discrimination <strong>of</strong> external background<br />

by fiducial volume cut). It is therefore crucial to provide several independent analysis methods<br />

which can be used for cross checks <strong>of</strong> the efficiency <strong>and</strong> systematic uncertainty <strong>of</strong> the applied<br />

cuts.<br />

In this work, a new method for the spatial reconstruction <strong>of</strong> scintillation events for BOREXINO<br />

<strong>and</strong> the CTF was developed <strong>and</strong> successfully tested with Monte Carlo simulations <strong>and</strong> CTF2<br />

data. From laboratory measurements <strong>and</strong> source tests in the CTF1, the parameters for an optical<br />

model <strong>of</strong> the light propagation in the liquid scintillator have been evaluated <strong>and</strong> applied in<br />

a tracking program developed for BOREXINO <strong>and</strong> the CTF. The reconstruction compares the<br />

ADC <strong>and</strong> TDC data from a real event with values from simulations on a spatial grid. The resolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> this reconstruction method therefore depends strongly on the underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

light propagation mechanisms. Calibration measurements with localized sources in the CTF2<br />

were performed in order to study the systematic behaviour <strong>of</strong> the reconstruction code.<br />

A new liquid scintillator based on phenyl-o-xylylethane (PXE) was tested as an alternative<br />

choice for BOREXINO. Its physical <strong>and</strong> chemical properties make it superior to pseudocumene<br />

(PC) in some respects, e.g. the higher density (target mass) <strong>and</strong> the higher flash point (safety),<br />

but there are also some limitations which need further investigation. In particular, the C<br />

concentration was about 6 times higher than in the PC measured in the CTF1 ( C/ C <br />

¡ ). The C level may vary, though, depending on the petroleum source, <strong>and</strong> also for<br />

the PC a new batch <strong>of</strong> scintillator from another source could have a higher C/ C ratio.<br />

The very low U concentration that was measured in PXE by NAA ( ¡ g/g) could<br />

not be confirmed by CTF measurements, as in the CTF1 the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the detector was<br />

substantially reduced due to the failure <strong>of</strong> a large fraction <strong>of</strong> the PMTs, <strong>and</strong> in the CTF2 a<br />

Rn background <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> several g/g from an unidentified source was present.<br />

The Th concentration measured in the CTF2 ( ¦ ¡ g/g) is compatible with the<br />

limit <strong>of</strong> ¡ g/g that was measured with NAA, confirming the high intrinsic radiopurity<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!