01.08.2013 Views

Development of a Liquid Scintillator and of Data ... - Borexino - Infn

Development of a Liquid Scintillator and of Data ... - Borexino - Infn

Development of a Liquid Scintillator and of Data ... - Borexino - Infn

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.2 Laboratory Measurements with PXE<br />

U <strong>and</strong> K negligible. Table 6.1 shows the results <strong>of</strong> the simulation. Even without any radial<br />

cuts, the background is a factor <strong>of</strong> 3 - 4 lower for PXE/water than for PC/PC. Increasing the<br />

radius <strong>of</strong> the fiducial volume from 300 to 320 cm, which would give for PXE/water about the<br />

same background contribution than for PC/PC, would yield a 20 % higher target volume, or a<br />

35 % higher target mass, which means that the Be neutrino signal rate would increase from<br />

55 events per day to about 75 events per day.<br />

250 - 800 keV 800 - 1400 keV<br />

Radius PC/PC PXE/Water PC/PC PXE/Water<br />

(cm) counts/day counts/day counts/day counts/day<br />

300 0.22 0.05 1.1 0.13<br />

325 1.15 0.30 4.9 0.71<br />

350 8.5 1.8 23 4.8<br />

375 66 14 103 25<br />

400 434 109 386 105<br />

425 1248 345 844 243<br />

all 1921 455 1023 298<br />

Table 6.1: Contribution <strong>of</strong> the PMTs <strong>and</strong> concentrators to the background in BOREXINO, placing<br />

the fiducial volume cut at different radii. From a Monte Carlo simulation for the two different<br />

scenarios: PC scintillator/ PC buffer, <strong>and</strong> PXE scintillator/ water buffer [Gri01].<br />

6.2 Laboratory Measurements with PXE<br />

6.2.1 Basic properties <strong>of</strong> PXE<br />

For the use in a large scale low background experiment not only the optical properties <strong>and</strong> the<br />

radiopurity (which will be discussed in more detail later), but also other physical properties<br />

have an impact on the choice <strong>of</strong> the material. These are e.g. density (target mass, background<br />

shielding), flammability (safety) <strong>and</strong> viscosity (liquid h<strong>and</strong>ling). Also the cost, availability <strong>and</strong><br />

legal classification <strong>of</strong> the material play an important role.<br />

PXE <strong>and</strong> PC are both aromatic hydrocarbons, made up <strong>of</strong> similar molecular structures <strong>and</strong><br />

with generally similar chemical properties. The molecular structure <strong>of</strong> the solvent <strong>and</strong> the fluor<br />

molecules <strong>of</strong> the scintillator mixtures under discussion are shown in fig. 6.1. The basic physical<br />

properties <strong>of</strong> PC <strong>and</strong> PXE are compared in table 6.2. PXE has a 10 % higher density than PC,<br />

whose advantages were already explained. PC is legally a hazardous material because <strong>of</strong> its<br />

flammability code (flammability class III). The transportation requirements are those <strong>of</strong> UN<br />

code 1993. PXE is not hazardous, <strong>and</strong> has no special UN hazard code or related transportation<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!