01.08.2013 Views

Development of a Liquid Scintillator and of Data ... - Borexino - Infn

Development of a Liquid Scintillator and of Data ... - Borexino - Infn

Development of a Liquid Scintillator and of Data ... - Borexino - Infn

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.3 The PXE Tests in the CTF<br />

measurements, as will be shown in chapter 7.<br />

Applying a radial cut on the Bi- Po event distribution, we could derive an upper limit<br />

for the intrinsic U contamination. For the analysis, I took two periods at the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

4 ton runs: run 773 - 780 (7.32 days, August 21 - 29), <strong>and</strong> run 783 - 789 (6.98 days, August 31<br />

- September 8).<br />

The following cuts were applied to select the Bi- Po events:<br />

- energy <strong>of</strong> the group 1 event: more than 100 pe (efficiency 95 %);<br />

- energy <strong>of</strong> the group 2 event: between 200 pe <strong>and</strong> 400 pe (efficiency 99 %);<br />

- coincidence time between 5 s <strong>and</strong> 800 s (efficiency 94%).<br />

Two further cuts served to reject events originating from cosmic ray muons:<br />

- the muon veto must not have triggered (no muonflag);<br />

- the meantime (i.e. the average time <strong>of</strong> all hit PMTs) must be below 25 ns.<br />

With these two cuts, muon events can be discriminated with a high efficiency while scintillation<br />

events are not affected.<br />

A varying radial cut around the z-axis was applied to reject the events inside the column. The<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> this cut together with the results obtained are listed in table 6.6. The best value<br />

obtained is<br />

<br />

Í ¦ ¡ <br />

for a cylindrical cut around the z-axis Ê Ñ.<br />

run773 - 780 run 783 - 789<br />

radius (m) mass (t) no. <strong>of</strong> U equiv. no. <strong>of</strong> U equiv.<br />

events ( g/g) events ( g/g)<br />

3.94 121 ¦ 101 ¦ <br />

3.64 79 ¦ 59 ¦ <br />

3.22 55 ¦ 41 ¦ <br />

2.72 42 ¦ 32 ¦ <br />

2.14 31 ¦ 24 ¦ <br />

1.53 26 ¦ 17 ¦ <br />

Table 6.6: Result <strong>of</strong> the U analysis after the application <strong>of</strong> different cylindrical cuts around<br />

the z-axis. The errors given are statistical errors only.<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!