02.08.2013 Views

Over Two-Hundred Education & Science Blogs * † - Department of ...

Over Two-Hundred Education & Science Blogs * † - Department of ...

Over Two-Hundred Education & Science Blogs * † - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix A. <strong>Two</strong> Social Networking Spheres<br />

1. Academic Discussion List* Sphere [ADLsphere - pronounced “addle-sphere”<br />

(no pun intended ;-)]<br />

a. Some Strengths <strong>of</strong> the ADLsphere<br />

(1) Dan MacIsaac (2000) [this APA style formatting means that the full reference can<br />

be found in the REFERENCES list below] in “Communities <strong>of</strong> on-line physics<br />

educators,” discusses the nature <strong>of</strong> academic discussion lists in physics (similar<br />

comments apply to similar lists for other disciplines):<br />

“It’s a physics educator’s dream—a readily available group <strong>of</strong> like-minded people with a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> backgrounds and expertise who want to discuss physics and physics pedagogy<br />

with their peers. For the teacher who is feeling overscheduled, isolated, or lonely this<br />

‘c<strong>of</strong>fee klatch’ opportunity is a boost that lasts all day and on into the night. We’re talking<br />

about the virtual world <strong>of</strong> electronic mailing lists that are dedicated to the teaching and<br />

learning <strong>of</strong> physics. This electronic community is bound together through shared<br />

information and experience, an on-line culture that comprises high-school, college, and<br />

university instructors, researchers, hobbyists, students, retired teachers, and amateurs.”<br />

(2) Amitai and Oren Etzioni (1997) in “Communities: Virtual vs. Real” wrote<br />

(paraphrasing):<br />

“Virtual on-line communities complement and reinforce ‘real’ <strong>of</strong>f-line communities and<br />

have several advantages over the latter, e.g.:<br />

(a) easy communication over national borders and time zones;<br />

(b) inclusion <strong>of</strong> homebound (aged, ill, or handicapped) people;<br />

(c) accommodation <strong>of</strong> more individuals than <strong>of</strong>f-line meeting rooms;<br />

(d) strong memories;<br />

(e) high safety;<br />

(f) allowance for exploration <strong>of</strong> new relationships and identities – as documented by<br />

MIT's Sherry Turkle (1997), and<br />

(g) indifference to physical appearance and <strong>of</strong>f-line identity.”<br />

(3) Discussion lists running on the popular LISTSERV <br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware feature excellent archives and powerful search engines that allow searches by<br />

keywords, author, subject title, date, or any combination <strong>of</strong> those. I know <strong>of</strong> no such<br />

search engines in the Blogosphere.<br />

(4) In “<strong>Over</strong> Sixty Academic Discussion Lists. . .” [Hake (2007)], I wrote:<br />

“. . . . . Academic Discussion Lists provide an effective but seldom used mechanism for<br />

tunneling through interdisciplinary barriers, caused in part by the traditional departmental<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> universities. This underutilized potential for education research and<br />

development is represented schematically . . . .[on the next page]. . . ”<br />

Similar figures would apply to other types <strong>of</strong> R & D. The partially open window between<br />

Astronomy- and Physics-education research and development in the top figure appears to<br />

be a fortunate carryover from the traditional close links between those two disciplines in<br />

non-educational basic research.<br />

___________________________________________________<br />

* A subset <strong>of</strong> what Wikipedia calls “Electronic Mailing<br />

Lists.”<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!