Over Two-Hundred Education & Science Blogs * † - Department of ...
Over Two-Hundred Education & Science Blogs * † - Department of ...
Over Two-Hundred Education & Science Blogs * † - Department of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Edge. 2008. Comments on “Is Google Making Us Stupid” [Carr (2008)] by W. Daniel Hillis,<br />
Kevin Kelly, Larry Sanger, George Dyson, Jaron Lanier, Douglas Rushk<strong>of</strong>f, W. Daniel Hillis, &<br />
David Brin; online at .<br />
<strong>Education</strong> Week <strong>Blogs</strong>. 2009. Online at <br />
(Primarily concerns K-12 education.) I thank Bob Schaeffer, <strong>Education</strong> Director <strong>of</strong> FairTest<br />
, for alerting me to this resource.<br />
Encyclopedia Britannica Blog. 2009. “Is Britannica Going Wiki?” online at<br />
.<br />
Etzioni, A. & O. Etzioni. 1997. "Communities: Virtual vs. Real,” editorial, <strong>Science</strong> 277: 29 and<br />
(as befits the theme) online at .<br />
Eubanks, D. 2009. “Higher <strong>Education</strong> News Online,” online at<br />
.<br />
RSS feed from nine sources (as <strong>of</strong> 09 Feb 2009): Campus Technology, Chronicle <strong>of</strong> Higher<br />
<strong>Education</strong> (tech), Chronicle <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Education</strong> (general), CollegeWebEditor, Educause,<br />
InsideHigherEd, New York Times, University Business, & Wired Magazine. See also Eubanks’ blog<br />
listed above.<br />
Fitzgerald, B. 2006. “Structuring Open Access to Knowledge” in Kapitzke & Bruce (2006).<br />
Gans, J.S. & G.B. Shepherd. 1994. “How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by<br />
Leading Economists,” The Journal <strong>of</strong> Economic Perspectives 8(1): 165-179; online as a 1.6 MB<br />
pdf at . The first paragraph reads:<br />
Do elite economists suffer publication setbacks? Are the economists who produce the important<br />
articles content with the refereeing process? We asked over 140 leading economists, including all<br />
living winners <strong>of</strong> the Nobel Prize and John Bates Clark Medal, to describe instances in which<br />
journals rejected their papers. We hit a nerve. More than 60 percent responded, many with several<br />
blistering pages. Paul Krugman expressed the tone <strong>of</strong> many letters: “Thanks for the opportunity to let<br />
<strong>of</strong>f a bit <strong>of</strong> steam.<br />
Gardner, S. & S. Birley. 2008. Blogging For Dummies, 2nd edition. For Dummies publishing.<br />
Amazon.com information at . Note the "Look Inside" feature.<br />
Giles, J. 2006. “Wikipedia rival calls in the experts: Encyclopaedia aims to recognize status <strong>of</strong><br />
academic editors,” Nature 443: 493 (4 October); online to subscribers at<br />
; at that site it is stated that:<br />
The current incarnation <strong>of</strong> Wikipedia is both phenomenally successful and, in the eyes <strong>of</strong> some<br />
critics, fundamentally flawed. The online encyclopaedia now includes more than a million entries in<br />
English alone.<br />
Glass, G.V. 1999. “Not For Sale: Scholarly Communications in Modern Society,” summary <strong>of</strong><br />
remarks at Session 6.31 “A Dialog About Electronic Forms <strong>of</strong> Scholarly Communication” <strong>of</strong> the<br />
American <strong>Education</strong>al Research Association Annual Meeting; 19 April; online at<br />
.<br />
48
Change language