MQFD: A Model for Synergizing TPM and QFD - Cochin University of ...

Table 11.21. Respondents' comments against Step 13 268
Table 11.22. Respondents' comments against Step 14 269
Table 11.23. Respondents' comments against Step 15 269
Table 11.24. Respondents' comments against Step 16 269
Table 11.25. Matrices used for quantitative assessment 270
Table 11.26. Strategic receptivity scorecard ofMQFD 271
Table 12.1. Multifarious applications ofAHP 274
Table 12.2. Saatys 1-9 scale for multy criteria decision making 278
Table 12.3. Weightage ofparameters in Saaty's scale. 279
Table 12.4. Pairwise degree comparison matrix of critical factors of 281
Critical factors ofthe component 'House ofQuality'
Table 12.5. Pairwise degree comparison matrix of critical factors of 282
Critical factors ofthe component 'Decision making'
Table 12.6. Pairwise degree comparison matrix of Critical factors of 282
the component 'TPM'
Table 12.7. Pairwise degree comparison matrix of Critical factors of 283
the component 'maintenance parameters'
Table 12.8. Pairwise degree comparison matrix of Critical factors of 283
the component 'quality parameters'
Table 12.9. Normalized values of critical factors of the component 284
'House ofQuality'
Table 12.10. Normalized values of critical factors of the component 284
'Decision making'
Table 12.11. Normalized values of critical factors of the component 284
'TPM Pillars'
Table 12.12. Normalized values of critical factors of the component 285
'maintenance parameters'
Table 12.13. Normalized values of critical factors of the component 285
'quality parameters'
Table 12.14. Pairwise degree comparison matrix of Sub-factors of the 288
critical factor 'customer'
Table 12.15. Pairwise degree comparison matrix of Sub-factors of the 288
critical factor 'technology'
Table 12.16. Pairwise degree comparison matrix of Sub-factors of the 289
critical factor 'competitors'
Table 12.17. Pairwise degree comparison matrix of Sub-factors of the 289
critical factor 'personnel'
Table 12.18. Pairwise degree comparison matrix of Sub-factors of the 290
critical factor 'autonomous maintenance'
Table 12.19. Pairwise degree comparison matrix of Sub-factors of the 290
critical factor 'individual improvement'
Table 12.20. Pairwise degree comparison matrix of Sub-factors of the 291
critical factor 'planned maintenance'.
Table 12.21. Pairwise degree comparison matrix of Sub-factors of the 291
critical factor 'quality maintenance'
XXlll