You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
35 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued)<br />
(b) Non-recurring transactions<br />
<strong>2009</strong> 2008<br />
RMB’000 RMB’000<br />
(Restated)<br />
Purchase of other technology and related services from<br />
a fellow subsidiary (Note viii) (2,550) (3,509)<br />
Purchase of property and equipment from fellow subsidiaries (Note ix) (2,579) (820)<br />
Sale of property and equipment to fellow subsidiaries (Note x) 2,862 4,504<br />
Reimbursement from an associated company for costs<br />
incurred in relation to the Japan website (Note xi) – 15,200<br />
(i) These represented expenses paid or payable by the Group for the use of certain technology, intellectual property and related<br />
know-how provided by the ultimate holding company. The expenses were calculated based on a mutually agreed basis.<br />
(ii) This represented license fee paid or payable by the Group to the ultimate holding company at a fixed fee of RMB2 million per<br />
annum.<br />
(iii) These represented charges paid or payable by the Group to various fellow subsidiaries and related companies in relation to the<br />
purchase of keywords and display advertisement on websites operated by various fellow subsidiaries and related companies as<br />
well as certain technology and related services from a fellow subsidiary. These charges were calculated based on market rates of<br />
the related services.<br />
(iv) This represented charges received or receivable by the Group from fellow subsidiaries for the cross-selling of the Group’s website<br />
inventory. The charge was calculated based on a pre-determined percentage of the underlying transaction amount.<br />
(v) This represented charges received or receivable by the Group from an associated company for the cross-selling of the associate’s<br />
products. The charge was calculated based on a pre-determined percentage of the underlying transaction amount.<br />
(vi) This represented charge received or receivable by the Group for the provision of administrative services to fellow subsidiaries. The<br />
charge was determined on a cost basis.<br />
(vii) This represented charge received or receivable by the Group for the provision of technology services to fellow subsidiaries. The<br />
charge was calculated based on actual cost incurred in providing such services plus a margin of 15%.<br />
(viii) These represented amounts paid or payable by the Group for the purchase of other technology and related services from a fellow<br />
subsidiary. These charges were determined on a cost basis.<br />
(ix) These represented amounts paid or payable by the Group for purchase of certain property and equipment from fellow subsidiaries.<br />
These charges were based on the net book value of the property and equipment transferred.<br />
(x) These represented amounts received or receivable by the Group for sale of certain property and equipment to fellow subsidiaries.<br />
These charges were based on the net book value of the property and equipment transferred.<br />
(xi) In 2008, <strong>Alibaba</strong> Japan paid US$2.2 million to the Group mainly for reimbursing the costs incurred by the Group in upgrading<br />
the Japan website as well as certain property and equipment and customer information of the Japan website before the deemed<br />
disposal of <strong>Alibaba</strong> Japan by the Group. The charge was determined on a cost basis or based on the net book value of the<br />
property and equipment transferred.<br />
The Group also exchanged certain advertising, promotion and related services, such as hyperlinks on respective<br />
websites, with fellow subsidiaries. As such reciprocal services provided by the Group and such fellow subsidiaries to<br />
each other are considered to be of a similar nature and have a similar value, such transactions are not regarded as<br />
revenue-generating transactions and thus no revenue or expense were recognized.<br />
The directors are of the opinion that the above transactions were conducted in the ordinary course of business of the<br />
Group.<br />
145