07.08.2013 Views

Results from a reconnaissance scale heavy mineral ... - arkisto.gsf.fi

Results from a reconnaissance scale heavy mineral ... - arkisto.gsf.fi

Results from a reconnaissance scale heavy mineral ... - arkisto.gsf.fi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lehtonen et al.<br />

<strong>Results</strong> <strong>from</strong> a <strong>reconnaissance</strong> <strong>scale</strong> <strong>heavy</strong> <strong>mineral</strong> survey of kimberlitic indicator <strong>mineral</strong>s…<br />

A common diamond exploration method in recently glaciated terrains, and one employed heavily<br />

in the Fennoscandian Shield, is to track kimberlitic indicator <strong>mineral</strong> grains (KIM) dispersed in<br />

Quaternary till and stream sediments. This prospecting method has been applied worldwide especially<br />

during <strong>reconnaissance</strong> and regional stages of exploration programs. The classic KIM<br />

suite used in diamond exploration includes Cr-pyrope, Ti-pyrope and eclogitic garnet, Crdiopside,<br />

Mg-ilmenite, and chromite. Exploration based on KIM's requires understanding of the<br />

glacial history in the region as well as sensitive processing methods, as the indicator contents in<br />

glacial sediments can, for various reasons, be extremely low even relatively close to the kimberlite.<br />

Major portions of the diamond prospective area in Finland (Fig. 1) has been subjected to <strong>reconnaissance</strong><br />

<strong>scale</strong> KIM surveys, initially by Malmikaivos-Ashton during the mid 80's to mid 90's<br />

(Tyni, 1997) followed by several junior companies after 1994 when Finland became <strong>fi</strong>rst a member<br />

of the EEA and then the EU. The earlier survey work resulted in the discovery of approximately<br />

25 kimberlitic bodies in eastern Finland, mostly in the Kaavi-Kuopio area. The more recent<br />

discoveries of kimberlites, in Kuhmo-Lentiira and Kuusamo have also been dependent upon<br />

or facilitated by Quaternary till sampling programs.<br />

GTK’s role in diamond exploration is to provide services mainly to junior companies in terms of<br />

sampling, laboratory work, geophysical surveys and expert consultancy. GTK has, for instance,<br />

developed a KIM processing system by modifying and augmenting 3" and 4.5" Knelson Concentrators<br />

that accomplishes a nearly complete recovery of moderately <strong>heavy</strong> <strong>mineral</strong>s (>0.25 mm)<br />

<strong>from</strong> till (Chernet et al., 1999). GTK does not explore for diamonds, but to raise interest in new<br />

prospective areas, it has carried out limited <strong>reconnaissance</strong> <strong>scale</strong> <strong>heavy</strong> <strong>mineral</strong> surveys in areas<br />

where companies have not been recently active. Initially, a case study was carried out in eastern<br />

Finland to test the methodology for KIM work (Lehtonen & Marmo, 2002), and two eastern<br />

Finland kimberlites have been selected as targets of detailed KIM surveys (Lehtonen et al.,<br />

2005). These case studies provide key information for diamond explorers in Fennoscandia.<br />

In 2001- 2005 GTK conducted a <strong>reconnaissance</strong> <strong>scale</strong> <strong>heavy</strong> <strong>mineral</strong> survey in till in a diamond<br />

prospective area in eastern Finland. To improve the quality of the GTK survey the sampling was<br />

carried out using excavators in contrast to earlier sampling programs that were restricted to hand<br />

shoveling.<br />

<strong>Results</strong> <strong>from</strong> this survey are presented in Appendices I-V, separately for each of the <strong>fi</strong>ve sample<br />

series. The results include maps over the sampling areas, coordinates and KIM contents of the<br />

sampling sites, and, electron microprobe analyses of KIM's presented in compositional classi<strong>fi</strong>cation<br />

diagrams. The original microanalytical data is given in Appendix VI. KIM's were recovered<br />

throughout the survey area; however, the number of positive samples was distinctly higher<br />

in the southern area. The number of KIM's per sampling site is generally low, <strong>from</strong> 0 to 6 grains,<br />

which, based on long term experience, is a typical result in <strong>reconnaissance</strong> <strong>scale</strong> sampling in<br />

Finland.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!