Download the full report (116 p.) - KCE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

94 Multislice CT in Coronary Heart Disease KCE Reports 82 37. Kalra MK, Brady TJ. Current status and future directions in technical developments of cardiac computed tomography. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2008;1(2):71–80. 38. Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, Thomson LEJ, et al. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: Noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(7):1107-18. 39. Hamon M, Morello R, Riddell JW, Hamon M. Coronary arteries: diagnostic performance of 16- versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography--meta-analysis. Radiology. 2007;245(3):720-31. 40. Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR, Nielsen CD, Nguyen SA, Savino G, et al. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology. 2007;244(1):112-20. 41. OHTAC. Multidetector Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Disease Screening in Asymptomatic populations. 2007. 42. Waugh N, Black C, Walker S, McIntyre L, Cummins E, Hillis G. The effectiveness and costeffectiveness of computed tomography screening for coronary artery disease: systematic review. Systematic review. The National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment (NCCHTA); 2006. Available from: http://www.hta.ac.uk/execsumm/summ1039.htm 43. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, Carr JJ, Goldin JG, Greenland P, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2006;114(16):1761-91. 44. Alkadhi H. The revival of step-and-shoot computed tomography coronary angiography: benefits and open questions. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2008(2):91- 2. 45. De Feyter PJ, Meijboom WB, Weustink A, Van Mieghem C, Mollet NRA, Vourvouri E, et al. Spiral multislice computed tomography coronary angiography: a current status report. Clin Cardiol. 2007;30(9):437-42. 46. Timmis AD, Feder G, Hemingway H. Prognosis of stable angina pectoris: why we need larger population studies with higher endpoint resolution. Heart. 2007;93(7):786-91. 47. SIGN. Management of stable angina. SIGN; 2007 February 2007. Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign96.pdf 48. Hueb W, Lopes NH, Gersh BJ, Soares P, Machado LAC, Jatene FB, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II): a randomized controlled clinical trial of 3 therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2007;115(9):1082-9. 49. Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JPA. PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(4):414- 5; author reply 7-8. 50. Neyt M, Van Brabandt H, Devriese S, Mahieu J, De Ridder A, De Graeve D. Drug Eluting Stents in Belgium:a Health Technology Assessment. Brussel: Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg (KCE); 2007. KCE reports 66A (D/2007/10.273/47) Available from: http://www.kce.fgov.be/index_nl.aspx?ID=0&SGREF=5260&CREF=10069 51. Van Brabandt H, Camberlin C, Vrijens F, Parmentier Y, Ramaekers D, Bonneux L. Variaties in de ziekenhuispraktijk bij acuut myocardinfarct in België. KCE; 2005. ( reports 14A) Available from: http://kce.fgov.be/index_nl.aspx?ID=0&SGREF=5270&CREF=5355 52. Hochman JS, Lamas GA, Buller CE, Dzavik V, Reynolds HR, Abramsky SJ, et al. Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(23):2395-407. 53. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, Califf RM, Cheitlin MD, Hochman JS, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-STsegment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(7):1366-74. 54. Poole-Wilson PA, Voko Z, Kirwan B-A, de Brouwer S, Dunselman PHJM, Lubsen J, et al. Clinical course of isolated stable angina due to coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(16):1928-35.
KCE Reports 82 Multislice CT in Coronary Heart Disease 95 55. Clayton TC, Lubsen J, Pocock SJ, Voko Z, Kirwan B-A, Fox KAA, et al. Risk score for predicting death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with stable angina, based on a large randomised trial cohort of patients. BMJ. 2005;331(7521):869. 56. Daly CA, De Stavola B, Sendon JLL, Tavazzi L, Boersma E, Clemens F, et al. Predicting prognosis in stable angina--results from the Euro heart survey of stable angina: prospective observational study. BMJ. 2006;332(7536):262-7. 57. Cheitlin MD. Evaluation of the low-risk patient with chest pain: is there incremental value over the clinical assessment of the patient with chest pain to doing a stress test in the emergency department? Cardiol Rev. 1999;7(1):27-8. 58. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Electron-beam and helical computed tomography for coronary artery disease. Review. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); 2004. Technology Assessment Report Available from: http://www.icsi.org/knowledge/detail.asp?catID=107&itemID=280 59. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Multi-detector computed tomography angiography for coronary artery disease. Systematic review. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MAS); 2005. Available from: http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/mas/tech/techlist_mn.html 60. Blue Cross Blue Shield A. Contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomographic angiography for coronary artery evaluation. Chicago IL: Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (BCBS). 2005:45. 61. Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment. Multi-slice computerised tomography coronary angiography. Report. Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AETSA); 2006. Available from: http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/salud/aetsa 62. Australia and New Zealand Horizon Scanning Network. Computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. Report. Adelaide: Australia and New Zealand Horizon Scanning Network (ANZHSN); 2006 March, 2006. Horizon scanning prioritising summary 000184 (Volume 12, Number 4) Available from: http://www.horizonscanning.gov.au/internet/horizon/publishing.nsf/Content/8F86C8B4D8513 895CA25715C0005D972/$File/Computed%20tomography%20coronary%20angiography%20f or%20the%20detection%20of%20coronary%20artery%20disease%20March2006.pdf 63. Blue Cross Blue Shield A. Contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomographic angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis or for evaluation of acute chest pain. Chicago IL: Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (BCBS). 2006;TEC Assessment 21(5):18. 64. AHRQ. Noninvasive Imaging for Coronary Artery Disease. Rockville, MD: 2006 October 3, 2006. 65. HarvardPilgrimHealthCare. Computed Tomography Angiography for Coronary Artery Disease. 2006 Ocotber 2006. Technology Assessment Policy 66. Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O, Christensen E, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C. 64multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(24):3042-50. 67. Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Ross MA, O'Neil BJ, Raff GL. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(8):863-71. 68. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, von Ziegler F, Tittus J, Nikolaou K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(19):2354-60. 69. Meijboom WB, Weustink AC, Pugliese F, van Mieghem CAG, Mollet NR, van Pelt N, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in women versus men with angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100(10):1532-7. 70. Shabestari AA, Abdi S, Akhlaghpoor S, Azadi M, Baharjoo H, Pajouh MD, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-channel multislice computed tomography in assessment of significant coronary artery disease in symptomatic subjects. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(12):1656-61. 71. Weustink AC, Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Otsuka M, Pugliese F, van Mieghem C, et al. Reliable high-speed coronary computed tomography in symptomatic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(8):786-94. 72. Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T, Jaffe R, Goldstein J, Karkabi B, et al. Impact of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography on clinical decision-making in emergency department patients with chest pain of possible myocardial ischemic origin. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100(10):1522-6.
Page 1 and 2:
64-Slice computed tomography imagin
Page 3:
64-Slice computed tomography imagin
Page 6 and 7:
KCE reports 82 C Multislice CT in C
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 13 and 14:
KCE Reports 82 Multislice CT in Cor
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56: KCE Reports 82 Multislice CT in Cor
Page 105: KCE Reports 82 Multislice CT in Cor
Page 113 and 114: This page is left intentionally bla
Page 115: KCE reports 33 Effects and costs of
show all

Download the full report (116 p.) - KCE

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?