Download the full report (116 p.) - KCE
Download the full report (116 p.) - KCE
Download the full report (116 p.) - KCE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>KCE</strong> Reports 82 Multislice CT in Coronary Heart Disease 35<br />
in some studies to a similar diagnostic accuracy in patients with heart rates above and<br />
below 70/min. 33, 106 Consequently, it has been suggested to omit pre-medication for<br />
heart rate control with dual-source 64-SCT. As will be discussed later, higher heart<br />
rates may allow good quality images to be obtained by using dual-source CT, but this<br />
advantage disappears when radiation limiting protocols are implemented, for which<br />
lower heart rates still remain necessary.<br />
Table 9: Use of pre-test beta-blockers in recent 64-SCT trials in native<br />
coronary arteries.<br />
Study single/dual beta-blocker before CT<br />
Alkadhi dual none; 30,6% were on permanent beta blocker treatment<br />
Hausleiter single if heart rate > 60/min (in 68,7%)<br />
Herzog single if heart rate > 65/min<br />
Leber dual none; 23% were on permanent beta blocker treatment<br />
Ropers dual none; 34% were on permanent beta blocker treatment<br />
Meijboom (gender) single<br />
if heart rate >65/min; in 73% of women<br />
if heart rate >65/min; in 70% of men<br />
Shabestari single if heart rate > 70/min; in 89%<br />
Shapiro single if heart rate > 60/min<br />
Weustink dual none; 71% were on permanant beta-blocker treatment<br />
Single: standard 64-SCT; dual: dual-source 64-SCT. Cfr. Table 7 and text for references.<br />
High calcium load represents <strong>the</strong> main contributor to stenosis overestimation and falsepositive<br />
ratings with MSCT. In 64-SCT studies, a significant deterioration in specificity in<br />
patients with a high calcium score has been found, which clearly affects PPV. By<br />
including unevaluable segments, in one study PPV decreased from 96% to 60%. 78 In dualsource<br />
MSCT, a similar decrease in specificity on a per-patient analysis was<br />
documented. In patients with an Agatston score of ≤194, specificity was 77.8 while it<br />
was 92.7 in those with a score of ≤194. 33 In a dual-source study by Brodoefel, image<br />
quality was significantly degraded in <strong>the</strong> presence of Agatston scores >400: whereas test<br />
specificity was 99% in patients with a score ≤100, it was 84% in those with a score<br />
>400. 106 The presence of calcium in <strong>the</strong> coronary arteries may be a major limitation for<br />
extrapolating <strong>the</strong> diagnostic performance of MSCT in trials to real-world populations.<br />
The Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study is a population-based study in which all<br />
inhabitants of a suburb of Rotterdam, aged 55 years or over, were invited to take part.<br />
The median Agatston calcium score (and interquartile range) was 312 (62-970) in men<br />
and 55 (5-261) in women. 107 This finding suggests that in unselected and elderly<br />
populations, <strong>the</strong> number of non-evaluable patients may be higher than in published trials.<br />
This is illustrated by <strong>the</strong> high number of inconclusive MSCTs in <strong>the</strong> outcome trials<br />
discussed earlier, which may be explained by a less strict selection of patients. In one<br />
trial, 67 25% of patients required fur<strong>the</strong>r testing, owing to intermediate severity lesions<br />
or non-diagnostic MSCTs. In <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, 20 out of 103 patients had suboptimal scans. 80<br />
A deterioration of diagnostic accuracy, has been <strong>report</strong>ed in obese patients. 88 This<br />
restriction is confirmed in dual-source 64-SCT. A comparable decrease in specificity and<br />
positive predictive value was found in both <strong>the</strong> segment- and patient-based analysis with<br />
higher BMI. While specificity was 89.4% in a patient-based analysis in a subgroup of<br />
patients with a BMI ≤ 26 kg/m², it was 84.1% in those with a BMI >26.0 kg/m². 33 In<br />
addition, <strong>the</strong> rate of non-evaluable segments was higher in overweight and obese<br />
patients. This deterioration of diagnostic accuracy might be explained by scattering and<br />
absorption of radiation in obese patients resulting in poorer image quality due to an<br />
increase in image noise. 33