10.08.2013 Views

Download the full report (116 p.) - KCE

Download the full report (116 p.) - KCE

Download the full report (116 p.) - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>KCE</strong> Reports 82 Multislice CT in Coronary Heart Disease 35<br />

in some studies to a similar diagnostic accuracy in patients with heart rates above and<br />

below 70/min. 33, 106 Consequently, it has been suggested to omit pre-medication for<br />

heart rate control with dual-source 64-SCT. As will be discussed later, higher heart<br />

rates may allow good quality images to be obtained by using dual-source CT, but this<br />

advantage disappears when radiation limiting protocols are implemented, for which<br />

lower heart rates still remain necessary.<br />

Table 9: Use of pre-test beta-blockers in recent 64-SCT trials in native<br />

coronary arteries.<br />

Study single/dual beta-blocker before CT<br />

Alkadhi dual none; 30,6% were on permanent beta blocker treatment<br />

Hausleiter single if heart rate > 60/min (in 68,7%)<br />

Herzog single if heart rate > 65/min<br />

Leber dual none; 23% were on permanent beta blocker treatment<br />

Ropers dual none; 34% were on permanent beta blocker treatment<br />

Meijboom (gender) single<br />

if heart rate >65/min; in 73% of women<br />

if heart rate >65/min; in 70% of men<br />

Shabestari single if heart rate > 70/min; in 89%<br />

Shapiro single if heart rate > 60/min<br />

Weustink dual none; 71% were on permanant beta-blocker treatment<br />

Single: standard 64-SCT; dual: dual-source 64-SCT. Cfr. Table 7 and text for references.<br />

High calcium load represents <strong>the</strong> main contributor to stenosis overestimation and falsepositive<br />

ratings with MSCT. In 64-SCT studies, a significant deterioration in specificity in<br />

patients with a high calcium score has been found, which clearly affects PPV. By<br />

including unevaluable segments, in one study PPV decreased from 96% to 60%. 78 In dualsource<br />

MSCT, a similar decrease in specificity on a per-patient analysis was<br />

documented. In patients with an Agatston score of ≤194, specificity was 77.8 while it<br />

was 92.7 in those with a score of ≤194. 33 In a dual-source study by Brodoefel, image<br />

quality was significantly degraded in <strong>the</strong> presence of Agatston scores >400: whereas test<br />

specificity was 99% in patients with a score ≤100, it was 84% in those with a score<br />

>400. 106 The presence of calcium in <strong>the</strong> coronary arteries may be a major limitation for<br />

extrapolating <strong>the</strong> diagnostic performance of MSCT in trials to real-world populations.<br />

The Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study is a population-based study in which all<br />

inhabitants of a suburb of Rotterdam, aged 55 years or over, were invited to take part.<br />

The median Agatston calcium score (and interquartile range) was 312 (62-970) in men<br />

and 55 (5-261) in women. 107 This finding suggests that in unselected and elderly<br />

populations, <strong>the</strong> number of non-evaluable patients may be higher than in published trials.<br />

This is illustrated by <strong>the</strong> high number of inconclusive MSCTs in <strong>the</strong> outcome trials<br />

discussed earlier, which may be explained by a less strict selection of patients. In one<br />

trial, 67 25% of patients required fur<strong>the</strong>r testing, owing to intermediate severity lesions<br />

or non-diagnostic MSCTs. In <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, 20 out of 103 patients had suboptimal scans. 80<br />

A deterioration of diagnostic accuracy, has been <strong>report</strong>ed in obese patients. 88 This<br />

restriction is confirmed in dual-source 64-SCT. A comparable decrease in specificity and<br />

positive predictive value was found in both <strong>the</strong> segment- and patient-based analysis with<br />

higher BMI. While specificity was 89.4% in a patient-based analysis in a subgroup of<br />

patients with a BMI ≤ 26 kg/m², it was 84.1% in those with a BMI >26.0 kg/m². 33 In<br />

addition, <strong>the</strong> rate of non-evaluable segments was higher in overweight and obese<br />

patients. This deterioration of diagnostic accuracy might be explained by scattering and<br />

absorption of radiation in obese patients resulting in poorer image quality due to an<br />

increase in image noise. 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!