10.08.2013 Views

Download the full report (116 p.) - KCE

Download the full report (116 p.) - KCE

Download the full report (116 p.) - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54 Multislice CT in Coronary Heart Disease <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 82<br />

6.3.2 Canada<br />

6.3.3 Australia<br />

a particular research setting with prospective data collection and analysis plan. In this<br />

case, a clinical study would be required following specified conditions. MSCT<br />

angiography would have to be performed with 32- or more slices CT machines. Finally,<br />

<strong>the</strong> coronary disease screening as well as o<strong>the</strong>r uses of cardiac MSCT would stay<br />

explicitly outside Medicare scope.<br />

After <strong>the</strong> 30-day public comment period, Medicare did not introduce this proposed<br />

coverage determination deciding that “no national coverage determination on <strong>the</strong> use of<br />

cardiac computed tomography angiography for coronary artery disease is appropriate at this<br />

time and that coverage should be determined by local contractors through <strong>the</strong> local coverage<br />

determination process or case-by-case adjudication”. 144 If <strong>the</strong> proposed Memo had become<br />

definitive, this would have replaced <strong>the</strong> current local policies by a much more restrictive<br />

national one. The requirements in terms of evidence development, <strong>the</strong> list of indications<br />

excluded from <strong>the</strong> proposed coverage and <strong>the</strong> definition of population eligible for<br />

coverage would have limited <strong>the</strong> access to MSCT coronary angiography and meant an<br />

end of <strong>the</strong> coverage for a majority of Medicare Beneficiaries.<br />

Canada has a national health program composed of 13 interlocking provincial and<br />

territorial health insurance plans, all of which share certain common features and basic<br />

standards of coverage.<br />

In Ontario for example, CT for coronary vessels scanning is not covered by <strong>the</strong> Ontario<br />

Health Insurance Program unlike (multi-slice) CT for thorax and for o<strong>the</strong>r anatomic<br />

sites. 41<br />

In Québec private hospitals, <strong>the</strong> patient is charged <strong>the</strong> MSCT coronary angiography<br />

while in public hospitals, <strong>the</strong> examination is covered under <strong>the</strong> thorax CT fee-forservice<br />

with no extra out-of-pocket payment. The thorax CT medical fee-for-service,<br />

independently from <strong>the</strong> technology involved, amounts to CAD 55.10 (€34) without<br />

contrast product injection or CAD 63.60 (€40) with contrast product injection (tariffs<br />

at March 1, 2008) . 145<br />

A specific code for cardiac CT is currently under examination (personal communication<br />

from Dr. Noël Bernard, Hôpital Laval, Institut de cardiologie de Québec).<br />

Until now (May 2008), non-coronary CT angiography was covered by <strong>the</strong> Australian<br />

national Medicare Benefit Schedule but coronary angiography was not covered. The<br />

computed tomography coronary angiography not yet being assessed by <strong>the</strong> Medical<br />

Services Advisory Committee, nor <strong>the</strong> CT angiography items nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> chest CT<br />

items could be used for a MSCT coronary angiography. Details on non-coronary CT<br />

angiography items are presented in appendix (Table 27).<br />

In 2006, MSCT coronary angiography was submitted to be assessed by <strong>the</strong> Medical<br />

Services Advisory Committee (MSAC) of Australia. The <strong>report</strong> has just been finalized by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Adelaide Health Technology Assessment Agency (AHTA) and should be published<br />

on <strong>the</strong> MSAC website around June, 2008. 146<br />

Based on this <strong>report</strong>, <strong>the</strong> MSAC considered MSCT coronary angiography safer than<br />

CCA and as effective as CCA in ruling out significant CAD in patients with symptoms<br />

consistent with coronary ischemia, with a high negative predictive value allowing CCA<br />

to be avoided if MSCT reveals no significant disease. The AHTA <strong>report</strong> included a<br />

decision analytic model in order to determinate <strong>the</strong> post-test probability of CAD based<br />

on <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong>ir own meta-analysis on <strong>the</strong> diagnostic accuracy of 64-SCT<br />

coronary angiography on a per-patient basis. (Personal communication from Tracy<br />

Merlin, Manager AHTA, University of Adelaide, May 2008) MSCT coronary angiography<br />

was considered to be cost-effective only in patients presenting a low to intermediate<br />

pre-test likelihood of CAD.<br />

Therefore, MSAC recommended a public funding for MSCT coronary angiography on<br />

specialist referral of patients with stable symptoms consistent with coronary ischaemia,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!