10.08.2013 Views

Download the full report (112 p.) - KCE

Download the full report (112 p.) - KCE

Download the full report (112 p.) - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>KCE</strong> Reports 111 Interventions in Alzheimer’s Disease 29<br />

Selwood et al. grouped educational programmes into training programmes based on<br />

stress and coping <strong>the</strong>ory versus training in behavioral management techniques. For each<br />

programme category thus defined, an individual or a group educational approach was<br />

studied, with a varying number of sessions (under 6 or minimum 6 sessions).<br />

Group training programmes (six or more sessions) for caregivers based on stress and<br />

coping <strong>the</strong>ory were studied in five RCTs (one of high quality). There is moderate level<br />

of evidence that <strong>the</strong>se programmes result in less depression for <strong>the</strong> caregivers lasting up<br />

to 3 months after <strong>the</strong> intervention. The effect on caregiver burden was less consistent. 57<br />

Individual coping strategies lasting at least 6 sessions were studied in four RCTs (one of<br />

high quality). There is moderate level of evidence that such interventions lead to less<br />

depression in caregivers, and lasting up to 3 months after <strong>the</strong> intervention. 57<br />

Group behavioral management techniques (behavioral management <strong>the</strong>ory and how to<br />

manage problem behavior) have been studied in RCTs, often combined with caregiver<br />

coping strategies. There is moderate level of evidence that group behavioral<br />

management is not an effective intervention, ei<strong>the</strong>r immediately or for up to 8 months.<br />

Similarly, <strong>the</strong>re is moderate level of evidence that less than 6 sessions of individual<br />

behavioral management is not an effective intervention, ei<strong>the</strong>r immediately or for up to<br />

6 months. However, when 6 or more individual sessions are given <strong>the</strong>re is high level<br />

evidence from RCTs for a benefit on depression in caregivers (but no effect on<br />

caregiver burden) immediately and up to 32 months.<br />

Finally, for support programs (mainly by telephone, self-help group, or nurses) <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

moderate level of evidence of no effect on CG depression, anxiety, or burden.<br />

Selwood et al. concludes <strong>the</strong>re is evidence that <strong>the</strong> psychosocial health of <strong>the</strong> caregiver<br />

can be improved after 6 or more individual behavioral management training sessions<br />

focusing on <strong>the</strong> patient’s behavior, or by teaching coping strategies for caregivers, taught<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r individually or in a group. It should be noted that Selwood did not mention which<br />

databases were searched; studies were included until July 2003.<br />

In <strong>the</strong>ir systematic review (RCTs only) of information and support interventions for<br />

caregivers of people with dementia, Thompson et al. 58 used yet ano<strong>the</strong>r way of<br />

classification. Interventions were grouped into technology-based (3 RCTs), group-based<br />

(13 RCTs) and individual-based (27 RCTs). Only 4 of <strong>the</strong>se studies were also discussed<br />

in Selwood et al. Two of <strong>the</strong> 3 high quality papers included in <strong>the</strong> SBU study are<br />

included by Thompson, as well as 13 o<strong>the</strong>r SBU papers. A statistically significant positive<br />

impact of group-based supportive interventions was found, but not for technologybased<br />

interventions or individual-based interventions for caregivers. A statistically<br />

significant effect of group psycho-educational approaches on depression in caregivers<br />

was seen but <strong>the</strong> evidence was very limited and <strong>the</strong> clinical significance of <strong>the</strong>se benefits<br />

remained unclear. The authors also <strong>report</strong>ed difficulties pooling <strong>the</strong> <strong>report</strong>ed outcomes<br />

of mostly poor quality studies. Thompson et al. based <strong>the</strong>ir search on <strong>the</strong> Cochrane<br />

Register for Dementia and included studies until October 2005.<br />

Logsdon et al. 48 reviewed 14 studies, of which 6 studies demonstrated a trend but no<br />

statistical significance. They found some evidence (1 RCT, also accepted by SBU) that a<br />

standard protocol based on PLST (Progressively lowered stress threshold) significantly<br />

lowers caregiver distress over behavior problems. They also mentioned 1 RCT of<br />

behavioral <strong>the</strong>rapy (also included by <strong>the</strong> SBU review, Livingston et al., and Ayalon et al.)<br />

describing a positive effect on depression in caregivers. Mainly individuals with<br />

depressive or anxious behaviors seemed to benefit.<br />

Their conclusions for care recipients concerning PLST or behavioral/ social learning<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory have been mentioned before (see paragraph 4.2.2.2).<br />

Gallagher-Thompson et al. 59 categorized studies into psychoeducational-skill<br />

building programs, psycho<strong>the</strong>rapy-counselling studies and multicomponent<br />

interventions. However, <strong>the</strong> focus was on caregivers of older adults, not necessarily<br />

persons with dementia, which strongly limits <strong>the</strong> conclusions of this review.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!