10.08.2013 Views

Download the full report (112 p.) - KCE

Download the full report (112 p.) - KCE

Download the full report (112 p.) - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

68 Interventions in Alzheimer’s Disease <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 111<br />

One should note that among <strong>the</strong> 168 patients who started ChEIs within 6 months after<br />

institutionalization 101 patients (60%) received <strong>the</strong>ir first prescription in a hospital<br />

setting. The distribution of <strong>the</strong> ROB/RVT-MR/MRS types used for <strong>the</strong> first charge is<br />

given below.<br />

Figure 3: ChEI use by ROB/RVT-MR/MRS type<br />

TYPE Discont'd Continued Started<br />

ROB A N 1 31 33<br />

ROB B N 4 72 52<br />

ROB C N 0 5 6<br />

ROB Cd N 4 32 15<br />

ROB O N 0 19 29<br />

RVT B N 4 37 17<br />

RVT C N 0 2 4<br />

RVT Cd N 4 30 12<br />

Total N 17 228 168<br />

These results illustrate ChEIs are prescribed mainly in patients who are not in <strong>the</strong><br />

highest classes (C) of dependency based on <strong>the</strong> Katz ADL scale. It should also be noted<br />

that <strong>the</strong> net change in ChEI use associated with institutionalization is thus an increase in<br />

<strong>the</strong> number of patients on ChEIs. The appropriateness of starting ChEIs after<br />

institutionalization was questioned by some of <strong>the</strong> external experts of this project.<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> patients with ChEI prescriptions in 2006, 466 patients (31%) resided in<br />

ROB/RVT-MR/MRS. If we assume that among <strong>the</strong> 40000 patients on ChEIs in 2008 31%<br />

or 12400 patients reside in a ROB/RVT-MR/MRS, <strong>the</strong> following can be derived. This<br />

would mean that 12400 (or 36%) of <strong>the</strong> estimated 34000 AD patients in ROB/RVT-<br />

MR/MRS receive a ChEI. This also means that about 27600 (69%) of <strong>the</strong> estimated<br />

41000 AD patients residing at home receive a ChEI.<br />

6.3.3 Routine use of new diagnostic markers<br />

The table below shows <strong>the</strong> patients who are tested, and also shows <strong>the</strong> number of tests<br />

over <strong>the</strong> period 2002-2006 for <strong>the</strong> 2502 patients in our study database. We do not<br />

know <strong>the</strong> reason for doing <strong>the</strong> test nor what analyses were exactly performed.<br />

Table 18: Number of tests and patients tested in 2002-2006 period among<br />

<strong>the</strong> 2502 patients who started ChEI <strong>the</strong>rapy.<br />

Test N tests N patients (% of 2502 patients)<br />

MRI 605 472 (18.9%)<br />

CSF 83 65 (2.6%)<br />

PET 78 72 (2.9%)<br />

DNA 42 33 (1.3%)<br />

MRI = MRI of head; CSF = lumbar puncture; PET = PET scan or functional scintigraphic test code<br />

used in case centre not registered for PET; DNA = genetic test based on DNA hybridization<br />

Test volumes for Belgium in this patient group can be estimated by multiplying <strong>the</strong>se<br />

numbers with a factor of 20. We could not study <strong>the</strong> reason why <strong>the</strong> test or procedure<br />

was performed, but as <strong>the</strong> timing of <strong>the</strong> test/procedure was often close to <strong>the</strong> start of<br />

ChEI <strong>the</strong>rapy in <strong>the</strong> majority of cases, we can assume that most tests/procedures were<br />

performed in <strong>the</strong> context of dementia diagnostic work-up.<br />

We conclude that <strong>the</strong> new proposed markers are not routinely used during <strong>the</strong> study<br />

period. According to <strong>the</strong> external experts consulted for this project <strong>the</strong>se markers, eg<br />

CSF markers, are used in selected patients and mainly in university centres. 130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!