10.08.2013 Views

Download the full report (112 p.) - KCE

Download the full report (112 p.) - KCE

Download the full report (112 p.) - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

46 Interventions in Alzheimer’s Disease <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 111<br />

EMBASE January 2004 – September 2008 52<br />

OVID ECONLIT January 2004 – September 2008 2<br />

Total 131<br />

Total Research questions 1 and 2 750<br />

Duplicates within Research question 1 152<br />

Duplicates within Research question 2 22<br />

Duplicates between Research questions 1 and 2 22<br />

Unique citations for Research questions 1 and 2 554<br />

5.1.2 Selection criteria<br />

5.1.2.1 HTA <strong>report</strong>s<br />

Only <strong>the</strong> most recent HTAs including a qualitative systematic review of <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

literature related to <strong>the</strong> above questions of interest were retained.<br />

5.1.2.2 Economic evaluations and reviews of economic evaluations<br />

All retrieved references were assessed against pre-defined selection criteria, in terms of<br />

population, intervention, and design (Table 8) in a two-step procedure: initial<br />

assessment of <strong>the</strong> title, abstract, and keywords, followed by a <strong>full</strong>-text assessment of <strong>the</strong><br />

selected references. When no abstract was available and <strong>the</strong> citation was unclear or<br />

ambiguous, consideration of <strong>the</strong> citation was directly made on <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>full</strong>-text<br />

assessment. Reference lists of <strong>the</strong> selected studies were checked for additional relevant<br />

citations. The selected <strong>full</strong> economic evaluations, i.e. <strong>the</strong> studies comparing at least two<br />

alternative treatments in terms of costs and outcomes (see classification in appendix),<br />

were <strong>the</strong>n summarised in in-house data extraction forms.<br />

Table 8: Economic evaluations selection criteria<br />

Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria<br />

Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment in AD patients<br />

Population Patients suffering from AD O<strong>the</strong>r patient groups<br />

Intervention Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic O<strong>the</strong>r interventions, diagnostic<br />

treatment<br />

tools<br />

Design Full economic evaluations (primary or<br />

secondary studies)<br />

Partial economic evaluations, etc<br />

Non-pharmacologic treatment in dementia patients<br />

Population Patients suffering from dementia O<strong>the</strong>r patient groups<br />

Intervention Non-pharmacologic treatment O<strong>the</strong>r interventions, diagnostic<br />

tools<br />

Design Full economic evaluations (primary or<br />

secondary studies)<br />

5.1.3 Selection process<br />

5.1.3.1 HTA <strong>report</strong>s<br />

Partial economic evaluations, etc<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> 80 HTA citations identified, 5 HTA <strong>report</strong>s including a systematic review of <strong>the</strong><br />

economic literature on Alzheimer disease or dementia treatments fulfilled <strong>the</strong> selection<br />

criteria. 1, 21, 72, 88, 89 Of those, <strong>the</strong> two eldest HTA <strong>report</strong>s 88, 89 were discarded since both<br />

21, 72<br />

<strong>report</strong>s were updated and included in most recent HTAs’ reviews.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!