Download the full report (112 p.) - KCE
Download the full report (112 p.) - KCE
Download the full report (112 p.) - KCE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
46 Interventions in Alzheimer’s Disease <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 111<br />
EMBASE January 2004 – September 2008 52<br />
OVID ECONLIT January 2004 – September 2008 2<br />
Total 131<br />
Total Research questions 1 and 2 750<br />
Duplicates within Research question 1 152<br />
Duplicates within Research question 2 22<br />
Duplicates between Research questions 1 and 2 22<br />
Unique citations for Research questions 1 and 2 554<br />
5.1.2 Selection criteria<br />
5.1.2.1 HTA <strong>report</strong>s<br />
Only <strong>the</strong> most recent HTAs including a qualitative systematic review of <strong>the</strong> economic<br />
literature related to <strong>the</strong> above questions of interest were retained.<br />
5.1.2.2 Economic evaluations and reviews of economic evaluations<br />
All retrieved references were assessed against pre-defined selection criteria, in terms of<br />
population, intervention, and design (Table 8) in a two-step procedure: initial<br />
assessment of <strong>the</strong> title, abstract, and keywords, followed by a <strong>full</strong>-text assessment of <strong>the</strong><br />
selected references. When no abstract was available and <strong>the</strong> citation was unclear or<br />
ambiguous, consideration of <strong>the</strong> citation was directly made on <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>full</strong>-text<br />
assessment. Reference lists of <strong>the</strong> selected studies were checked for additional relevant<br />
citations. The selected <strong>full</strong> economic evaluations, i.e. <strong>the</strong> studies comparing at least two<br />
alternative treatments in terms of costs and outcomes (see classification in appendix),<br />
were <strong>the</strong>n summarised in in-house data extraction forms.<br />
Table 8: Economic evaluations selection criteria<br />
Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria<br />
Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment in AD patients<br />
Population Patients suffering from AD O<strong>the</strong>r patient groups<br />
Intervention Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic O<strong>the</strong>r interventions, diagnostic<br />
treatment<br />
tools<br />
Design Full economic evaluations (primary or<br />
secondary studies)<br />
Partial economic evaluations, etc<br />
Non-pharmacologic treatment in dementia patients<br />
Population Patients suffering from dementia O<strong>the</strong>r patient groups<br />
Intervention Non-pharmacologic treatment O<strong>the</strong>r interventions, diagnostic<br />
tools<br />
Design Full economic evaluations (primary or<br />
secondary studies)<br />
5.1.3 Selection process<br />
5.1.3.1 HTA <strong>report</strong>s<br />
Partial economic evaluations, etc<br />
Of <strong>the</strong> 80 HTA citations identified, 5 HTA <strong>report</strong>s including a systematic review of <strong>the</strong><br />
economic literature on Alzheimer disease or dementia treatments fulfilled <strong>the</strong> selection<br />
criteria. 1, 21, 72, 88, 89 Of those, <strong>the</strong> two eldest HTA <strong>report</strong>s 88, 89 were discarded since both<br />
21, 72<br />
<strong>report</strong>s were updated and included in most recent HTAs’ reviews.