14.08.2013 Views

Lattice 3256A-90LM PLD - Smithsonian - The Chip Collection

Lattice 3256A-90LM PLD - Smithsonian - The Chip Collection

Lattice 3256A-90LM PLD - Smithsonian - The Chip Collection

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Report Number: SCA 9705-538<br />

Construction Analysis<br />

<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

<strong>PLD</strong><br />

Serving the Global Semiconductor Industry Since 1964<br />

17350 N. Hartford Drive<br />

Scottsdale, AZ 85255<br />

Phone: 602-515-9780<br />

Fax: 602-515-9781<br />

e-mail: ice@ice-corp.com<br />

Internet: http://www.ice-corp.com<br />

®


TITLE<br />

INDEX TO TEXT<br />

- i -<br />

PAGE<br />

INTRODUCTION 1<br />

MAJOR FINDINGS 1<br />

TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION<br />

Die Process 2<br />

ANALYSIS RESULTS I<br />

Die Process and Design 3 - 5<br />

ANALYSIS PROCEDURE 6<br />

TABLES<br />

Overall Quality Evaluation 7<br />

Die Material Analysis (EDX) 8<br />

Horizontal Dimensions 9<br />

Vertical Dimensions 10


INTRODUCTION<br />

This report describes a construction analysis of the <strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong> Programmable<br />

Logic Device (<strong>PLD</strong>). One decapped device was received for the analysis. <strong>The</strong> device was<br />

date coded 9650.<br />

Questionable Items: 1<br />

MAJOR FINDINGS<br />

• Aluminum 1 thinning up to 100 percent 2 (Figure 15). Total metal 1 thinning was<br />

reduced to 90 percent with the addition of the cap and barrier.<br />

Special Features:<br />

• Sub-micron gate lengths (0.5 micron N-channel and 0.6 micron P-channel).<br />

Design Features:<br />

• Slotted and beveled metal 2 bus lines.<br />

1 <strong>The</strong>se items present possible quality or reliability concerns. <strong>The</strong>y should be discussed<br />

with the manufacturer to determine their possible impact on the intended application.<br />

2 Seriousness depends on design margins.<br />

- 1 -


Die Process and Design:<br />

TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION<br />

• <strong>The</strong> device was fabricated using a selective oxidation, twin-well CMOS process in a<br />

P-substrate. No epi was used.<br />

• Passivation consisted of a layer of nitride over a layer of silicon-dioxide.<br />

• Metallization employed two levels of metal. Both consisted of aluminum with a<br />

titanium-nitride (TiN) cap and barrier. A thin titanium (Ti) adhesion layer was used<br />

under metal 1. Standard vias and contacts were used (no plugs).<br />

• <strong>The</strong> interlevel dielectric consisted of two layers of glass with a spin-on-glass (SOG)<br />

between the two layers.<br />

• Pre-metal glass consisted of a layer of reflow glass over various densified oxides.<br />

Glass was reflowed prior to contact cuts only.<br />

• A single layer of polycide (tungsten silicide) was used to form one plate of the<br />

capacitors and all gates on the die. Direct poly-to-diffusion (buried) contacts were<br />

not used. Definition was by a dry etch of normal quality.<br />

• Standard implanted N+ and P+ diffusions formed the sources/drains of the CMOS<br />

transistors. An LDD process was used with oxide sidewall spacers left in place.<br />

• Local oxide (LOCOS) isolation. A step was present at the edge of the well which<br />

indicates a twin-well process was used. No problems were noted.<br />

• Two EEPROM cell arrays were used on the device. Both devices are<br />

programmed through an ultra thin (tunnel) oxide window. Metal 2 was used to<br />

form the bit lines and distribute ground on array B. Metal 1 was used for<br />

interconnect and to distribute ground on array A. Poly was used to form the gates<br />

and one plate of the capacitors and gates.<br />

- 2 -


Die Process :<br />

Questionable Items: 1<br />

ANALYSIS RESULTS I<br />

- 3 -<br />

Figures 1 - 36<br />

• Aluminum 1 thinning up to 100 percent 2 (Figure 15). Total metal 1 thinning was<br />

reduced to 90 percent with the addition of the cap and barrier.<br />

Special Features:<br />

• Sub-micron gate lengths (0.5 micron N-channel and 0.6 micron P-channel).<br />

Design features:<br />

• Slotted and beveled metal 2 bus lines.<br />

General items:<br />

• Fabrication process: Devices were fabricated using a selective oxidation, twin-well<br />

CMOS process in a P-substrate. No epi was used.<br />

• Process implementation: Die layout was clean and efficient. Alignment was good at<br />

all levels. No damage of contamination was found.<br />

• Die coat: No die coat was present.<br />

• Overlay passivation: A layer of nitride over a layer of silicon-dioxide. Overlay<br />

integrity test indicated defect-free passivation. Edge seal was good.<br />

1 <strong>The</strong>se items present possible quality or reliability concerns. <strong>The</strong>y should be discussed<br />

with the manufacturer to determine their possible impact on the intended application.<br />

2 Seriousness depends on design margins.


ANALYSIS RESULTS I (continued)<br />

• Metallization: Two levels of metal. Both consisted of aluminum with titanium-<br />

nitride (TiN) caps and barriers. A thin titanium (Ti) adhesion layer was present<br />

beneath metal 1. Standard vias and contacts were used (no plugs).<br />

• Metal patterning: Both metal levels were patterned by a dry etch of normal quality.<br />

• Metal defects: No voiding, notching, or neckdown was noted in the metal of either<br />

layer. Contacts and vias were completely surrounded by metal. No silicon nodules<br />

were noted following removal of either metal layer.<br />

• Metal step coverage: Metal 2 aluminum thinned up to 75 percent at vias. Total metal<br />

2 thinning was reduced to 65 percent with the addition of the cap and barrier. Metal 1<br />

aluminum thinned up to 100 percent at some contacts. Total metal 1 thinning was<br />

reduced to 90 percent with the addition of the cap and barrier.<br />

• Interlevel dielectric: Two layers of silicon-dioxide were present under metal 2<br />

(interlevel dielectric). <strong>The</strong> first layer had been subjected to an etchback process. A<br />

layer of spin-on-glass (SOG) was present between the layers for planarization<br />

purposes.<br />

• Pre-metal glass: A layer of reflow glass over various densified oxides was used<br />

under metal 1. Reflow was performed prior to contact cuts only. No problems were<br />

found.<br />

• Contact defects: Contact and via cuts were defined by a two-step process. No<br />

over-etching of the contacts or vias was noted.<br />

• A single layer of polycide (tungsten silicide) was used to form all gates on the die<br />

and one plate of the capacitors. Direct poly-to-diffusion (buried) contacts were not<br />

used. Definition was by a dry-etch of normal quality.<br />

- 4 -


ANALYSIS RESULTS I (continued)<br />

• Standard implanted N+ and P+ diffusions formed the sources/drains of the CMOS<br />

transistors. An LDD process was used with oxide sidewall spacers left in place. No<br />

problems were found.<br />

• Local oxide (LOCOS) isolation was used with a step present at the well boundary<br />

indicating that a twin-well process was employed.<br />

• Two EEPROM cell arrays were used on the device. Both use the same design (but<br />

different layout) and are programmed through an ultra thin (tunnel) oxide window.<br />

Metal 2 was used to form the bit lines and distribute ground on array B. Metal 1<br />

was used for interconnect and to distribute ground in array A. Poly was used to<br />

form the gates and one plate of the capacitors. Cell size (array A): 9.0 x 9.5<br />

microns. Cell size (array B): 13 x 36 microns<br />

• Redundancy fuses were not present on the die.<br />

- 5 -


PROCEDURE<br />

<strong>The</strong> devices were subjected to the following analysis procedures:<br />

Internal optical inspection<br />

SEM of passivation<br />

Passivation integrity test<br />

Passivation removal<br />

SEM inspection of metal 2<br />

Metal 2 removal and inspect barrier<br />

Delayer to metal 1 and inspect<br />

Metal 1 removal and inspect barrier<br />

Delayer to silicon and inspect poly/die surface<br />

Die sectioning (90° for SEM) *<br />

Die material analysis<br />

Measure horizontal dimensions<br />

Measure vertical dimensions<br />

* Delineation of cross-sections is by silicon etch unless otherwise indicated.<br />

- 6 -


OVERALL QUALITY EVALUATION : Overall Rating: Normal<br />

DETAIL OF EVALUATION<br />

Die surface integrity:<br />

Toolmarks (absence) G<br />

Particles (absence) G<br />

Contamination (absence) G<br />

Process defects G<br />

General workmanship N<br />

Passivation integrity G<br />

Metal definition N<br />

Metal integrity * N<br />

Metal registration N<br />

Contact coverage N<br />

Contact registration N<br />

* Even with the isolated spots where metal 1 thins 100 percent we judge adequate metal<br />

remains around the contact perimeter.<br />

G = Good, P = Poor, N = Normal, NP = Normal/Poor<br />

- 7 -


DIE MATERIAL ANALYSIS<br />

Final passivation: A layer of silicon-nitride over a layer of glass.<br />

Metallization 2: Aluminum (Al) with a titanium-nitride (TiN) cap<br />

and barrier.<br />

Metallization 1: Aluminum (Al) with a titanium-nitride (TiN) cap<br />

and barrier on a thin titanium (Ti) adhesion layer.<br />

Silicide (poly): Tungsten (W).<br />

- 8 -


HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS<br />

Die size: 7.4 x 9.2 mm (290 x 364 mils)<br />

Die area: 68 mm 2 (105,560 mils 2 )<br />

Min pad size: 0.1 x 0.1 mm (4.0 x 4.0 mils)<br />

Min pad window: 0.09 x 0.09 mm (3.8 x 3.8 mils)<br />

Min pad space: 28 microns<br />

Min metal 2 width: 1.1 micron<br />

Min metal 2 space: 1.1 micron<br />

Min metal 2 pitch: 2.2 microns<br />

Min metal 1 width: 0.8 micron<br />

Min metal 1 space: 0.8 micron<br />

Min metal 1 pitch: 1.6 micron<br />

Min via: 0.85 micron<br />

Min contact: 0.8 micron<br />

Min polycide width: 0.5 micron<br />

Min polycide space: 0.7 micron<br />

Min gate length * - (N-channel): 0.5 micron<br />

- (P-channel): 0.6 micron<br />

Cell pitch (array A): 9.0 x 9.5 microns<br />

Cell size (array A): 85.5 microns 2<br />

Cell pitch (array B): 13 x 35 microns<br />

Cell size (array B): 455 microns 2<br />

* Physical gate length<br />

- 9 -


VERTICAL DIMENSIONS<br />

Die thickness: 0.5 mm (20 mils)<br />

Layers:<br />

Passivation 2: 0.45 micron<br />

Passivation 1: 0.25 micron<br />

Metal 2 - cap: 0.05 micron (approximate)<br />

- aluminum: 0.8 micron<br />

- barrier: 0.12 micron<br />

Interlevel dielectric- glass 2: 0.4 micron<br />

- glass 1: 0.3 micron (average)<br />

Metal 1 - cap: 0.07 micron (approximate)<br />

- aluminum: 0.5 micron<br />

- barrier: 0.12 micron<br />

Pre-metal dielectric: 0.75 micron (average)<br />

Oxide on polycide: 0.15 micron<br />

Polycide - silicide: 0.1 micron<br />

- poly: 0.12 micron<br />

Local oxide: 0.45 micron<br />

N+ S/D: 0.13 micron<br />

P+ S/D: 0.2 micron<br />

N-well: 4.0 microns<br />

P-well: 4.0 microns<br />

- 10 -


INDEX TO FIGURES<br />

DIE LAYOUT AND IDENTIFICATION Figures 1 - 3<br />

PHYSICAL DIE STRUCTURES Figures 4 - 39<br />

COLOR DRAWING OF DIE STRUCTURE Figure 21<br />

EEPROM CELL (ARRAY A) Figures 22 - 28<br />

EEPROM CELL (ARRAY B) Figures 29 - 35<br />

INPUT PROTECTION CIRCUIT Figure 36<br />

GENERAL CIRCUIT LAYOUT Figure 36<br />

- ii -


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

Figure 1. Whole die photograph of the <strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong>. Mag. 25x.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

Figure 2. Markings from the die surface. Mag. 320x.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


Figure 3. Optical views of the die corners on the <strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong>. Mag. 160x.<br />

<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

Mag. 170x<br />

Mag. 600x<br />

Figure 4. Perspective SEM views of dicing and edge seal. 60°.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

DIE EDGE<br />

METAL 1<br />

METAL 2<br />

METAL 1<br />

METAL 2<br />

Figure 5. SEM section views of the edge seal.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Mag. 1400x<br />

Mag. 3200x<br />

Mag. 6500x


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

POLY<br />

METAL 2<br />

INTERLEVEL DIELECTRIC<br />

N+ S/D<br />

METAL 2<br />

N+ S/D<br />

METAL 1<br />

Figure 6. SEM section views of general device structure. Mag. 10,000x.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

METAL 1


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

Mag. 5200x<br />

Mag. 10,000x<br />

Figure 7. Perspective SEM views of overlay passivation coverage. 60°.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

Mag. 13,000x<br />

PASSIVATION 2<br />

PASSIVATION 1<br />

ALUMINUM 2<br />

PASSIVATION<br />

METAL 2<br />

METAL 1<br />

INTERLEVEL DIELECTRIC<br />

Mag. 26,000x<br />

INTERLEVEL DIELECTRIC<br />

TiN CAP<br />

TiN BARRIER<br />

Figure 8. SEM section views of metal 2 line profiles.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

VIA<br />

METAL 2<br />

Mag. 2000x<br />

METAL 2<br />

Mag. 4000x<br />

Figure 9. Topological SEM views of metal 2 patterning.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

PASSIVATION<br />

METAL 2<br />

METAL 1<br />

METAL 2<br />

METAL 2<br />

INTERLEVEL DIELECTRIC<br />

Figure 10. SEM views of metal 2 coverage and via.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Mag. 6500x<br />

Mag. 13,000x<br />

Mag. 26,000x


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

PRE-METAL DIELECTRIC<br />

Mag. 40,000x<br />

ALUMINUM 1<br />

Mag. 52,000x<br />

Figure 11. SEM section views of metal 1 line profiles.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

INTERLEVEL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

ALUMINUM 1<br />

TiN CAP<br />

SOG<br />

TiN BARRIER


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

Mag. 3200x<br />

METAL 1<br />

Mag. 6500x<br />

METAL 1<br />

CONTACT<br />

Figure 12. Topological SEM views of metal 1 patterning. 0°.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

METAL 1<br />

Mag. 6500x<br />

CONTACT<br />

Mag. 20,000x<br />

METAL 1<br />

Figure 13. Perspective SEM views of metal 1 coverage. 60°.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

SOG<br />

60°<br />

METAL 1<br />

glass etch<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

TiN<br />

BARRIER<br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

POLY<br />

Figure 14. SEM views of barrier coverage and a metal contact. Mag. 26,000x.


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

SOG<br />

100%<br />

THINNING<br />

METAL 1<br />

P+ S/D<br />

METAL 1<br />

N+ S/D<br />

POLY<br />

INTERLEVEL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

POLY<br />

POLY<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

metal 1-to-P+<br />

metal 1-to-N+<br />

Figure 15. SEM section views of typical metal 1 contacts. Mag. 26,000x.<br />

SOG<br />

P+ S/D<br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

N+ S/D<br />

METAL 1<br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

metal 1-to-poly


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

POLY<br />

Mag. 3200x<br />

POLY<br />

Mag. 6500x<br />

Figure 16. Topological SEM views of poly patterning. 0°.<br />

N+<br />

P+<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

POLY<br />

DIFFUSION<br />

POLY<br />

DIFFUSION<br />

LOCAL<br />

OXIDE<br />

LOCAL<br />

OXIDE<br />

POLY<br />

Figure 17. Perspective SEM views of poly coverage. 60°.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Mag. 6500x<br />

Mag. 40,000x<br />

Mag. 40,000x


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

P+ S/D<br />

N+ S/D<br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

GATE<br />

OXIDE<br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

POLY<br />

POLY<br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

GATE<br />

OXIDE<br />

P+ S/D<br />

SIDEWALL<br />

SPACER<br />

N+ S/D<br />

Figure 18. SEM section views of typical transistors. Mag. 52,000x.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

METAL 1<br />

glass etch<br />

P-channel<br />

N-channel


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

LOCAL<br />

OXIDE<br />

Figure 19. SEM section view of a local oxide birdsbeak. Mag. 52,000x.<br />

LOCAL<br />

OXIDE<br />

STEP<br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

P-WELL<br />

P-SUBSTRATE<br />

BIRDSBEAK<br />

POLY<br />

N-WELL<br />

Figure 20. Section views of the well structure.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Mag. 26,000x<br />

Mag. 800x


,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,<br />

INTERLEVEL ,,,,,,,<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,<br />

,,,,,,,<br />

SOG<br />

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,<br />

,,,,,,,<br />

N+ S/D<br />

,,,,,,,,,,<br />

,,,,,,,,,,<br />

P-WELL<br />

POLY<br />

LOCAL<br />

OXIDE<br />

METAL 1<br />

METAL 2<br />

PRE-METAL DIELECTRIC<br />

P+ S/D<br />

Orange = Nitride, Blue = Metal, Yellow = Oxide, Green = Poly,<br />

Red = Diffusion, and Gray = Substrate<br />

Figure 21. Color cross section drawing illustrating device structure.<br />

PASSIVATION 2<br />

PASSIVATION 1<br />

,,,,,,,,,,,,,<br />

,,,,,,,,,,,,,<br />

,,,,,,,,,,,,,<br />

,,,,,,,,,,,,,<br />

N-WELL<br />

<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

metal 2<br />

metal 1<br />

poly<br />

Figure 22. Perspective SEM views of the EEPROM cell array. Array A, Mag. 3200x,<br />

60°.


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

Mag. 6500x<br />

Mag. 26,000x<br />

TUNNEL OXIDE<br />

DEVICE<br />

Figure 23. Detailed SEM views of the EEPROM cell array. Array A, 60°.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

metal 2<br />

metal 1<br />

poly<br />

Figure 24. SEM views of the EEPROM cell array. Array A, Mag. 1600x, 0°.


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

BIT<br />

BIT<br />

B<br />

metal 2<br />

metal 1<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Figure 25. Additional SEM views of the EEPROM cell array. Array A, Mag. 3200x,<br />

A<br />

GND


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

C<br />

BIT<br />

C<br />

2<br />

1<br />

poly<br />

WORD<br />

2<br />

1<br />

B<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Figure 26. SEM view and schematic of the EEPROM cell. Array A, Mag. 3200x, 0°.


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

TUNNEL<br />

OXIDE<br />

WINDOW<br />

Figure 27. Topological SEM view of the tunnel oxide window. Array A,<br />

Mag. 13,000x, 0°.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

N+ S/D<br />

SELECT<br />

GATE<br />

N+ S/D<br />

GATE<br />

OXIDE<br />

TUNNEL<br />

OXIDE<br />

DEVICE<br />

POLY SELECT GATE<br />

POLY<br />

TUNNEL<br />

OXIDE<br />

METAL 1<br />

POLY<br />

GATE<br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

N+ S/D<br />

Figure 28. SEM section views of an EEPROM cell. Array A.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

N+ S/D<br />

Mag. 13,000x<br />

Mag. 40,000x<br />

Mag. 52,000x


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

metal 2<br />

metal 1<br />

poly<br />

Figure 29. Perspective SEM views of the additional EEPROM cell array. Array B,<br />

Mag. 1600x, 60°.


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

metal 2<br />

metal 1<br />

poly<br />

Figure 30. SEM views of additional EEPROM cells. Array B, Mag. 1600x.


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

BIT 0<br />

GND<br />

metal 2<br />

metal 1<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Figure 31. Detailed SEM views of additional EEPROM cell. Array B, Mag. 3200x. 0°.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

BIT 1


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

BIT 0<br />

WORD<br />

BIT 1<br />

1<br />

C1<br />

C1<br />

WORD<br />

2<br />

poly<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Figure 32. Detailed SEM view and schematic of additional EEPROM cell. Array B,<br />

Mag. 3200x, 0°.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

A<br />

3<br />

B<br />

3


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

N+ S/D<br />

SELECT<br />

GATE<br />

METAL 1<br />

TUNNEL<br />

OXIDE<br />

DEVICE<br />

Mag. 10,000x<br />

POLY<br />

METAL 2<br />

TUNNEL<br />

OXIDE<br />

Mag. 40,000x<br />

POLY<br />

GATE<br />

Figure 33. SEM section views of additional EEPROM cell. Array B.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

N+ S/D


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

N+<br />

N+<br />

TUNNEL<br />

OXIDE<br />

POLY<br />

TUNNEL<br />

OXIDE<br />

METAL 1<br />

TUNNEL<br />

OXIDE<br />

DEVICE<br />

PRE-METAL<br />

DIELECTRIC<br />

POLY<br />

CAPACITOR<br />

Figure 34. SEM section views of additional EEPROM cell. Array B.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Mag. 5000x<br />

Mag. 37,000x<br />

Mag. 52,000x


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

POLY<br />

CAPACITOR<br />

CAPACITORS<br />

Mag. 8000x<br />

Mag. 20,000x<br />

METAL 1<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation<br />

Figure 35. SEM section views of additional EEPROM cell through the capacitor region.<br />

Array B.


<strong>Lattice</strong> <strong>3256A</strong>-<strong>90LM</strong><br />

Mag. 320x<br />

Mag. 800x<br />

Figure 36. Optical views of an I/O structure and general circuitry.<br />

Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!