16.08.2013 Views

The computation of turbulent natural convection flows - Turbulence ...

The computation of turbulent natural convection flows - Turbulence ...

The computation of turbulent natural convection flows - Turbulence ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

381<br />

reduces towards the sides and also with distance from the exit <strong>of</strong> the penetra-<br />

tion. Comparison with the corresponding contour plots at the lower Rayleigh<br />

number <strong>of</strong> Figure 8.11, shows that the main difference is that in the higher<br />

Ra case, the downward motion diminishes more rapidly with distance from<br />

the penetration exit. Contour comparisons for the normalised spanwise ve-<br />

locity component, U, Figures 8.37 and 8.11, show that the change in Rayleigh<br />

number has little effect on the weak spanwise velocity field outside the pene-<br />

tration. <strong>The</strong> most detectable difference being the higher levels near the pene-<br />

tration exit, at the higher Ra case. A similar conclusion can be reached about<br />

the Rayleigh number effects on the axial velocity outside the penetration, from<br />

Figures 8.38 and 8.12. One difference is that the axial velocity near the open<br />

end <strong>of</strong> the penetration increases more substantially with Rayleigh number. As<br />

already seen at the lower Ra case, conditions outside the penetration are prac-<br />

tically isothermal, Figure 8.39, which is why there is very little deviation from<br />

the hydrostatic conditions, Figure 8.38. <strong>The</strong> corresponding plots <strong>of</strong>k contours,<br />

Figure 8.39 , show that in common with the lower Ra case, Figure 8.7, the gen-<br />

eration <strong>of</strong> turbulence occurs mainly within the boundary layer that develops<br />

along the vertical wall, but in contrast to the lower Ra case, it is confined to a<br />

narrow central region below the penetration exit.<br />

Figure 8.40 shows the contour plots <strong>of</strong> V, T and P ” within <strong>of</strong>f-centre longi-<br />

tudinal planes, y-z, at locations X <strong>of</strong> 0.25 and 0.5. Comparison with the cor-<br />

responding plots <strong>of</strong> Figure 8.14, for the lower Ra case, show that the thermal<br />

and pressure fields remain isothermal and hydrostatic respectively, but while<br />

at the lower Rayleigh number the vertical velocity is higher near the symmetry<br />

plane and drops along the vertical wall, at the higher Ra the vertical velocity<br />

is uniform within both longitudinal planes. At both Ra values the downward<br />

flow becomes weaker with distance from the centre.<br />

<strong>The</strong> plots <strong>of</strong> Figure 8.41, <strong>of</strong> the vertical velocity andk contours within hori-<br />

zontal planes outside the penetration and comparisons with the corresponding<br />

low Ra plots <strong>of</strong> Figure 8.16, confirm the earlier observations on the downward<br />

motion, while for the <strong>turbulent</strong> kinetic energy, they indicate that this is mainly<br />

generated at the wall region below the open end <strong>of</strong> the penetration.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!