16.08.2013 Views

The computation of turbulent natural convection flows - Turbulence ...

The computation of turbulent natural convection flows - Turbulence ...

The computation of turbulent natural convection flows - Turbulence ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Literature Review 66<br />

walls. For the Reynolds shear stress, there was improvement in the square<br />

cavity case but there was no improvement for the tall cavity case.<br />

Hanjalić[31] numerically studied one-point closure models for buoyancy-<br />

driven <strong>turbulent</strong> <strong>flows</strong>. <strong>The</strong> thermal buoyancy-driven <strong>flows</strong> are considered<br />

as a challenge for one-point-closure models. <strong>The</strong> buoyancy-driven <strong>flows</strong> are<br />

difficult to model because <strong>of</strong> inherent unsteadiness, energy non-equilibrium,<br />

counter gradient diffusion and high pressure fluctuations. He investigated<br />

some specific turbulence modelling issues regarding buoyant <strong>flows</strong> within<br />

the realm <strong>of</strong> one-point closures. Firstly, the disadvantages <strong>of</strong> isotropic eddy-<br />

diffusivity models were discussed in the work. A major disadvantage is that<br />

they are not capable <strong>of</strong> capturing interactions <strong>of</strong> <strong>turbulent</strong> heat flux and the ef-<br />

fects <strong>of</strong> buoyancy. Another disadvantage is that the alignment <strong>of</strong> the <strong>turbulent</strong><br />

heat flux with the mean temperature-gradient vector leads to model failure<br />

in many cases such as Rayleigh-Bénard <strong>convection</strong>. However, 3D and time-<br />

dependent simulation using EVM is able to avoid this drawback. <strong>The</strong>n it was<br />

shown that Algebraic models based on a rational truncation <strong>of</strong> the differential<br />

second-moment closure is the minimum closure level for complex <strong>flows</strong>. <strong>The</strong><br />

algebraic second moment closure was found not to be adequate to capture the<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> buoyancy driven <strong>flows</strong> but it was capable <strong>of</strong> predicting more phe-<br />

nomena than the eddy-diffusivity models. He presented results regarding two<br />

generic <strong>flows</strong> <strong>of</strong> the side heated vertical channel and Rayleigh-Bénard convec-<br />

tion. It was concluded that in these cases the isotropic eddy-diffusivity model<br />

leads to wrong results. <strong>The</strong> algebraic second-moment closure was found to<br />

improve the results to some extent but still there was huge discrepancy with<br />

DNS data. It was possible to modify the algebraic second-moment closure<br />

term by term to re-produce the DNS data but, because <strong>of</strong> inherent nonlinearity,<br />

the generalization to complex <strong>flows</strong> would be doubtful. Finally he proposed<br />

using algebraic truncation <strong>of</strong> the second moment closure to determine an alge-<br />

braic equation for the <strong>turbulent</strong> heat fluxes. It was shown that this will capture<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> internal buoyancy-driven <strong>flows</strong>.<br />

Hsieh and Lien[32] investigated the numerical modelling <strong>of</strong> buoyancy-driven<br />

<strong>turbulent</strong> <strong>flows</strong> in enclosures. <strong>The</strong>y carried out <strong>computation</strong>s for enclosures

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!