Gender Equality National Report Hungary - European-microfinance ...
Gender Equality National Report Hungary - European-microfinance ...
Gender Equality National Report Hungary - European-microfinance ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Hungary</strong>’s membership in the EU (and even the period prior to the accession) means<br />
a positive control in this respect, as the professional principles of the EU give a strong<br />
orientation to the Hungarian professional apparatus. For instance, when the EU Commission<br />
issued the JEREMIE program (with micro-credit specified), the micro-credit program, which<br />
had been present for a long time, was given great value, which resulted in the allocation of<br />
new funds for micro-finance purposes in 2007 (for the first time since 2000!), which exceeded<br />
the previous resources manyfold in amount.<br />
c.) All types of institutes aiming to assist enterprises have already been established in<br />
<strong>Hungary</strong>; these are briefly introduced below starting with state actors and then continuing<br />
with market actors:<br />
• Organizations of the state administration, authorities, institutes (universities,<br />
research institutes etc.) financed of course by the state budget<br />
• State-owned organizations aiming to develop SMEs (e.g. the Hungarian Development<br />
Bank, Creditguarantee, Regional development Holding etc., EXIMbank Corvinus),<br />
and support brokerage organizations (MAG Close Corp. etc.), which are<br />
established and continuously financed by the state.<br />
• Non-profit development agencies (NGOs), which are not founded directly by the<br />
state, but partly execute state functions as well. They can carry out these state<br />
functions only with support (regional and enterprise development agencies). The<br />
primary mission of these organizations is delivering enterprise development functions<br />
and services that cannot be directly taken care of by state actors nor market actors.<br />
They operate successfully in all aspects because they work neither as an<br />
“authority” nor as "market sharks”, and they are under performance pressure<br />
(for they receive resources only if they function well). The majority of these<br />
organizations are established locally or regionally under local control but they<br />
also carry out government functions on the order of and with the support of the<br />
government.<br />
• Chambers (of commerce and industry, agriculture and special fields etc.) They<br />
operate as local governments following special rules, but they also carry out<br />
important functions of economic development that the state may transfer to them and<br />
finance.<br />
• Entrepreneurial business federations, trade associations: (VOSZ, GYOSZ,<br />
IPOSZ, KISOSZ, Innovation Association, Association of Business Incubators etc.)<br />
They co-operate in this field for the protection of entrepreneurial interests and so that<br />
they can provide services to their members.<br />
• Enterprises providing business-type services (financial institutes, enterprises<br />
of property development, consultancy and training etc.)<br />
Although the institution of enterprise development has been long established, it<br />
does not seem to operate efficiently. The operation of individual organizations is not<br />
efficient enough; it has not helped sufficiently to strengthen the Hungarian SME sector, to<br />
make it more competitive. The target is to correct previous mistakes and improve the<br />
efficiency of the existing institutions, which will enhance the specialization and<br />
professionalism of the organizations and most of all promote the approximation of<br />
the enterprises and the supporting institution.<br />
The main reason for the problem is the parallel finance and competition of<br />
enterprise promotion programs and institutes in the past decade. This led to the failure<br />
of the evolution of a co-operating institution. With a little exaggeration: every actor wanted to<br />
do everything, thus no one could do any function properly. The individual organizations were<br />
unable to specialize sufficiently or become professional service providers. Their operations<br />
were significantly limited by the flaws in the professional preparation and the finance of their<br />
18