Toxicity measurements in concentrated water samples - Rivm

More documents

Recommendations

Info

RIVM Report 607013010/2009 Centre for Water Management Report 2009.003 Toxicity measurements in concentrated water samples Evaluation and validation A.M. Durand S. Rotteveel, Centre for Water Management, Lelystad M.T. Collombon, (present address: Bureau Waardenburg) E. van der Grinten J.L. Maas, Centre for Water Management, Lelystad W. Verweij Contact: Anke Durand Laboratory for Ecological Risk Assessment anke.durand@rivm.nl This investigation has been performed by order and for the account of Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, within the framework of project M/607013 ‘Bioassays’ and of the Directorate-General for Public Works and Water Management, within the framework of project C243.0003 ‘Bioanalyse’. RIVM, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands Tel +31 30 274 91 11 www.rivm.nl
© RIVM 2009 Parts of this publication may be reproduced, provided acknowledgement is given to the 'National Institute for Public Health and the Environment', along with the title and year of publication. 2 RIVM Report 607013010
Page 1: Report 607013010/2009 A.M. Durand e
Page 5 and 6: 4 RIVM Report 607013010
Page 9 and 10: 4 Toxicity testing 51 4.1 Choice of
Page 15 and 16: • endpoints mortality, growth inh
Page 17 and 18: De biologische methoden zijn gesele
Page 19 and 20: environmental samples respond to th
Page 21 and 22: For less than 4 test species, the s
Page 25 and 26: is sufficient. The system used shou
Page 29 and 30: water sample with the XAD (Figure 3
Page 31 and 32: 3.3.1 Extraction from the water sam
Page 33 and 34: - the affinity of the hydrophilic p
Page 35 and 36: 3.3.2 Elution from XAD Solvent sele
Page 37 and 38: Water concentrates need to be analy
Page 39 and 40: factor. Substances with a vapour pr
Page 41 and 42: a % of nominal initial concentratio
Page 43 and 44: % of nominal initial concentration
Page 45 and 46: After KD-distillation the recovery
Page 47 and 48: Too much water in an acetone eluate
Page 49 and 50: The experiments with other chemical
Page 51 and 52: 3.6 Conclusions The method seems su
Page 53 and 54:
Table 4-1 gives an overview of the
Page 55 and 56:
Figure 4-2. Pseudokirchneriella sub
Page 57 and 58:
Figure 4-3. Daphnia magna, adult 2
Page 59 and 60:
Figure 4-7. Chydorus sphaericus, ad
Page 61 and 62:
tests in the range of 25-50 %. In c
Page 63 and 64:
In the chemical risk assessment an
Page 65 and 66:
this purpose, a concentration accor
Page 67 and 68:
The calculated pT value is very use
Page 69 and 70:
effects on these important groups a
Page 71 and 72:
setting Environmental Risk Limits),
Page 73 and 74:
72 RIVM Report 607013010
Page 75 and 76:
possible. In case an analytical met
Page 77 and 78:
Table6-4. Repeatability of the tota
Page 79 and 80:
during the extraction procedure, in
Page 81 and 82:
0 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 standar
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Lobith and Eijsden, where these riv
Page 87 and 88:
20 16-20 11-15 6-10 2-5 Nieuwe Wate
Page 89 and 90:
In a second sampling campaign the i
Page 91 and 92:
Figure 7-6. Maximum effect values s
Page 93 and 94:
Preliminary experiments suggest tha
Page 95 and 96:
In planning monitoring activities u
Page 97 and 98:
their natural environment. However,
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Dekker T, Greve GD, Ter Laak TL, Bo
Page 105 and 106:
Peeters ETHM (2001) Benthic macroin
Page 107 and 108:
Willemsen A, Vaal MA, De Zwart D (1
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Substance type Substance CAS nr mol
Page 113 and 114:
approach is that it ignores the pre
Page 115:
RIVM National Institute for Public
show all

Toxicity measurements in concentrated water samples - Rivm

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?