31.08.2013 Views

AIAS newsletter Autumn 2012 TW.indd

AIAS newsletter Autumn 2012 TW.indd

AIAS newsletter Autumn 2012 TW.indd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

30<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

Book review<br />

Employers’ organizations and the effects<br />

of ‘voluntary’ abstention from collectively<br />

negotiated agreements<br />

Review by Jan Cremers, published in Transfer 18(3), August <strong>2012</strong>, p. 364-365<br />

‘Why do workers leave unions?’ was the title of an article in Transfer 17(4) in 2011. In it, the authors explored the<br />

reasons for workers leaving trade unions or staying on as trade union members.<br />

In the book ‘The paradox of employers’<br />

federations’, Martin Behrens of the Hans<br />

Böckler Foundation discusses a similar case<br />

applying to employers. His in-depth analysis<br />

of German employer organizations reveals<br />

a range of reasons for employers belonging<br />

to such organizations, while at the same<br />

time exposing the myth that employers act<br />

in conformity. Employer organizations have<br />

always been seen as an important building<br />

block of the regulatory frame anchoring<br />

the ‘Rhineland model’. In the long term an<br />

increase in ‘opt-out clauses’ and in companies<br />

making use thereof will undermine the<br />

principal function of employer organizations.<br />

Though their role will not disappear,<br />

the conclusion after reading this book is<br />

that there is a qualitative change, with new<br />

ways of adding value needing to be developed<br />

to maintain attractiveness.<br />

Martin Behrens. Das Paradox der Arbeitgeberverbände<br />

– Von der Schwierigkeit, durchsetzungsstarke<br />

Unternehmensinteressen kollektiv<br />

zu vertreten [The paradox of employers’<br />

Article<br />

Men care revisited<br />

By Marianne Grunell, published in Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, no 15, <strong>2012</strong>, p<br />

51-56<br />

I discuss the thesis of my Phd on<br />

men’s changing contribution to<br />

everyday care and the new social<br />

appeal made to them (2002).<br />

A decade later my conclusions<br />

on a major historical<br />

change are sceptical.<br />

The urgency of<br />

the matter has diminished<br />

at the authorities<br />

and in social organisations.<br />

Men themselves<br />

– in particular the focusgroup of fathers<br />

of young children – remain ambivalent.<br />

Although they say that they want to work<br />

less to care more, only a few work part-time.<br />

This small group of highly educated men,<br />

working in the social sector or at the authorities<br />

remains a priviledged group, with paid<br />

care arrangements and a pro-care culture.<br />

Much more widespread are full-time working<br />

fathers, who changed their careing attituede<br />

in their free time. Their choice fi ts well<br />

in the Dutch one-and-a-half-earning model,<br />

in which mothers work part-time and men<br />

full-time. The interests of both are served<br />

well in this model that will also dominate<br />

the coming years.<br />

federations – the diffi culty of collectively<br />

representing assertive company interests],<br />

Research series of the German Hans-Böckler-Foundation,<br />

Bd. 130, Edition Sigma:<br />

Berlin, 2011; 238 pp.<br />

In: Transfer 18(3), August <strong>2012</strong>, p. 364-365,<br />

http://trs.sagepub.com/content/current

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!