06.09.2013 Views

Untitled - Quarter Century Wireless Association

Untitled - Quarter Century Wireless Association

Untitled - Quarter Century Wireless Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Robert H. McNamara, Chief of FCC Special Services<br />

Division, advised Vaughan that "...when normal<br />

communications systems are overloaded, damaged or disrupted<br />

because a disaster has occurred, or is likely to occur...an<br />

amateur station may make transmissions necessary to meet<br />

essential communications needs and facilitate relief actions. The<br />

rules also state that when a disaster disrupts normal<br />

communication qystems in a particular area, the FCC Engineerin-Charge<br />

in the area concerned may declare a temporary state<br />

of communication emergency and set forth any special<br />

conditions and special rules to be observed by stations during<br />

the communication emergency." (See Sec. 97.401-407.)<br />

Further, amateur stations are authorized to exchange<br />

emergency messages: (1) with a station in other FCC regulated<br />

Services (Sec. 97.lll(aX2); (2) U.S. Government stations<br />

necessary to providing communications in RACES, the Radio<br />

Amateur Civil Emergenry Service (Sec. 97.111(aX3); and (3) a<br />

station in a service not regulated by the FCC but approved by<br />

the FCC to communicate with amateur stations (Sec.<br />

e7.1 I l(a)(4).<br />

McNamara said the issue of re-transmission of<br />

government broadcasts was also considered in 1989, when the<br />

FCC declined to authorize such re-transmissions because these<br />

transmissions (presumably the emergency or warning<br />

transmissions originated by government or broadcast service<br />

stations) can be widely received using very affordable receivers.<br />

This is still true today, and therefore, the FCC can see no reason<br />

to allow the use ofamateur service frequencies for additional retransmissions.<br />

Rules Amended Concerning 222-225 and 1240-1300 MHz<br />

Bands: On November 30, 1992, the FCC adopted a Notice of<br />

Proposed Rule Making proposing (1) to create a subband in the<br />

222-225 MHz band where repeaters would be prohibited; (2) to<br />

authorize frequency privileges for Novice Class operators in the<br />

entire 222-225 lvfrlz band, and (3) to allow Novice Class<br />

operators to be licensecs and control operators of repeaters in<br />

the 222-225 MHz band as well as in the 12'.10-1295 wlz<br />

segment of the 1240-1300 MHz band. On November 19, 1993,<br />

the Commission adopted the proposed rules on establishment of<br />

a subband and authorization of privileges for Novices in the<br />

entire 222-225 MHz band, but declined to adopt the proposal<br />

relating to Novices as control operators and licensees of<br />

repeaters in either band.<br />

The Commission considered carefully the comments<br />

for and against establishing a protected subband. They agreed<br />

with the ARRL that it is desirable that there be a uniform,<br />

nationwide subband where experimental operations can take<br />

place unaffected by repeater use. The concluded that the public<br />

interest would be served by establishing a protected subband at<br />

222.000-222.150 MHz.<br />

The proposal to expand the privileges of Novice Class<br />

operators by authorizing them the entire 222'225 MHz band<br />

met with a very favorable response from the commentors.<br />

There was general agreement that authorizing Novice<br />

Class operators additional frequenry privileges would provide<br />

an opportunity for them to become proficient in a wider variety<br />

of amateur service operations. In addition, Novice Class<br />

operators will have more flexibility in selecting the mode of<br />

transmission that they want to use.<br />

There was significant opposition to the Commission's<br />

proposal to permit Novice Class operators to serve as licensees<br />

and control operators of repeaters in the 222-225 and 1240-<br />

1300 MHz bands. In view of the lack of substantial suppo( by<br />

the amateur community for granting Norice Class operators<br />

these additional privileges, the Commission deided not to<br />

amend the Rules in this respect. It was note4 in this<br />

connection, that the distinction betrren the Novice and<br />

Technician Classes would be diminished by granting Novices<br />

the proposed repeater privileges.<br />

Vanity Call Sign System Proposed by the FCC: On December<br />

29, 1993, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rule Making<br />

(NPRM: PR Docket 93-305) on amendment of the amateur<br />

service Rules to implement a vanity call sign system. This<br />

NPRM marks the beginning of action on the long-awaited<br />

general solution to the matter of requests for "special" call<br />

signs.<br />

The Notice says in part: "Information age technologr is<br />

providing the capability to administer a vanity call sign system<br />

and provide better and more friendly service to our customers.<br />

The Private Radio Bureau's Licensing Division will smn be<br />

installing a new automated licensing process that will provide<br />

greater flexibility in licensing. With the added capability, we<br />

can now propose to amend the rules to implement a system<br />

whereby amateur station licensees could select call signs of their<br />

choice, provided they are not already assigned. This vanity call<br />

sign system would be in addition to the current sequential call<br />

sign system that we would continue to use for those applicants<br />

who do not want a vanity call sign."<br />

Applicants for a vanity call sign would list a maximum<br />

often call signs in order ofpreference. The automated process<br />

would compare the applicant's list with the assigned call signs<br />

in the groups designated in the sequential call sign system /or<br />

the applicant's class o/ operator license. @mphasis ours.) The<br />

first available call sign from the applicant's list would then be<br />

assigned. If none of the call signs listed are available, the<br />

automated process would reassign the call sign that the<br />

applicant had vacated. The vanity call sign(s) listed by the<br />

applicant must be within the /ramework of the sequential call<br />

sign assignment system, wherein certain groups of call signs<br />

are designated for each class of operator license. Applicants,<br />

therefore, could choose call signs from the groups<br />

conesponding to their license classes or lower license classes.<br />

@mphasis ours.)<br />

The Appendix to the NPRM includes proposed new<br />

text for Section 97.L9, to be titled "Application for a vanity call<br />

sign." @xisting Sections 97.L9 et seq would be renumbered.)<br />

The deadline for comments was March 7, 1994, and<br />

for reply comments is April7,1994.<br />

The proposed action overtakes and supersedes an<br />

earlier Order (May 11, 1993) amending the amateur service<br />

rules to establish call sign administrators for club and military<br />

recreation stations. Consequently, the earlier Order was<br />

rescinded by Memorandum Opinion and Order also dated<br />

December 29,1993.<br />

13 Spring 199a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!