12.09.2013 Views

BIOPIRACY Imitations Not Innovations - Biopirateria

BIOPIRACY Imitations Not Innovations - Biopirateria

BIOPIRACY Imitations Not Innovations - Biopirateria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20 Biopiracy: <strong>Imitations</strong> <strong>Not</strong> <strong>Innovations</strong><br />

undertaken in a few states.<br />

Gene Campaign has undertaken documentation of IK of biodiversity in<br />

various parts of the country in order to establish prior art to challenge biopiracy<br />

and to secure the rights of local communities to a share in the benefits derived<br />

from the commercial use of biological resources using IK. The documentation<br />

aims at establishing and placing on record the body of knowledge that exists in<br />

the public domain. Also, this is done to ensure that this knowledge and the<br />

biological resources are the property of the indigenous people. Placing and<br />

establishing the source of this knowledge as that belonging to the indigenous<br />

communities will be the strongest evidence against the patent claims made by<br />

the corporate sector and also prevent private companies from exploiting the<br />

knowledge of the indigenous communities without paying them anything in<br />

return. It is important to establish their claim to a share in the profits made<br />

from different products like herbal drugs, cosmetics etc. which use indigenous<br />

knowledge. Gene Campaign has documented biodiversity and IK in Jharkhand,<br />

Madhya Pradesh and Uttaranchal. The work was focussed on three tribal<br />

populations: the Mundas in Jharkhand; the Bhils of Madhya Pradesh; and the<br />

Tharus of the Terai region of Uttaranchal. The Department of Science and<br />

Technology of the Indian Government supported the documentation. A large<br />

number of villages were covered in the documentation exercise. For example, 50<br />

villages of the Tharu community of Uttaranchal were included. The fieldwork<br />

was carried out by trained members of the community. In addition to a<br />

standardized, structured questionnaire, techniques such as semi-structured<br />

questionnaires, informal interviews and group discussions were used for the<br />

collection of data. Group discussions exclusively for women were also conducted.<br />

In some villages it was found that the women were more curious and enthusiastic<br />

about the documentation work than their male counterparts.<br />

Each community has been assured that the data would remain their property<br />

and its misuse would not be permitted. Only the community itself would have<br />

the power to grant permission for commercial use of the IK contained in the<br />

documents. The data is presently being kept in the safe custody of the<br />

Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, but this does not<br />

confer ownership on the Department or the Government. This has been done<br />

to ensure that this documentation does not end up facilitating biopiracy in the<br />

absence of legal protection to such data under the national legislation of India<br />

with the Biological Diversity Act being also inadequate in this respect.<br />

Gene Campaign has also conducted a survey in selected locations in Assam<br />

with the purpose of documenting bioresources and indigenous knowledge to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!