23.10.2013 Views

Beginning the Dialogue - Report on SGR - Federal Transit ...

Beginning the Dialogue - Report on SGR - Federal Transit ...

Beginning the Dialogue - Report on SGR - Federal Transit ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Approaches to Financing<br />

C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> (state of good repair)<br />

n Infracos must maintain, renew and manage <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

assets so as to ensure reas<strong>on</strong>able life<br />

expectancy (defined as assets in c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> A-C)<br />

no later than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> third review period;<br />

n Infracos must also achieve specified c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> or<br />

residual life benchmarks by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> end of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

c<strong>on</strong>tract; and<br />

n During <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first review period (7.5 years), all grey<br />

assets (c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> unknown) must be assessed.<br />

Fault <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g>ing (repairs)<br />

n Infraco must rectify all asset related faults<br />

reported by LU staff.<br />

n Service points are allocated to certain failures if<br />

Infracos do not meet c<strong>on</strong>tractual obligati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Major Projects (line upgrades)<br />

n Major projects involving replacement of trains<br />

and signals which increase <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> capability to<br />

deliver improvements in trip times.<br />

Stati<strong>on</strong> Refurbishment and Modernizati<strong>on</strong><br />

n Infracos must implement a program of stati<strong>on</strong><br />

modernizati<strong>on</strong> and refurbishment as specified in<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tract.<br />

n Any project not delivered by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> latest completi<strong>on</strong><br />

date will incur abatements. Abatement is levied<br />

until <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> project is completed and varies<br />

according to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> scale of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> project.<br />

After five years of operating with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> PPP, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong> Transport Assembly, in its January 2007<br />

Review, stated: “There have been some very<br />

worthwhile gains from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> PPP. When we have seen<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> private sector at its best, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> results have been<br />

impressive. They have had much better relati<strong>on</strong>ships<br />

with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir workforce, and have been inventive and<br />

resourceful in using innovative engineering soluti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

to overcome challenges <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Tube network that<br />

should have been tackled decades ago.”<br />

44<br />

However, <strong>on</strong> July 18, 2007, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Metr<strong>on</strong>et Infracos<br />

collapsed after a $4-billi<strong>on</strong> cost overrun <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir PPP<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tracts. The Transport Committee's report <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

failure laid much of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> blame for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> problems<br />

surrounding <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sortium of private sector<br />

companies with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> UK Department for Transport,<br />

which it said should have been seen that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

proposed management structure of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tracts<br />

would be incapable of efficient delivery. Thus, this<br />

PPP cannot be c<strong>on</strong>sidered an unmitigated success.<br />

If we are willing to learn from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir successes and<br />

mistakes <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is much positive knowledge we<br />

can take from this example.<br />

The L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong> Underground experience is intriguing in<br />

that it provides experience <strong>on</strong> how private sector<br />

investors can, or cannot, make a profit operating a<br />

public enterprise while protecting <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> public interest.<br />

It shows how a guaranteed public funding stream can<br />

be leveraged to provide very substantial up-fr<strong>on</strong>t<br />

investment in infrastructure renewal and also realize<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> benefits of private sector management. This can<br />

be d<strong>on</strong>e at a cost comparable to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cost of issuing<br />

public b<strong>on</strong>ds. Private sector management has <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

advantage of not being tied to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> annual budgeting<br />

c<strong>on</strong>straints that make strategic asset management<br />

difficult for public agencies.<br />

r CAPITAL LEASING<br />

Capital leasing is a routine way of financing capital<br />

equipment in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> U.S. In 1987 <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Surface<br />

Transportati<strong>on</strong> and Uniform Relocati<strong>on</strong> Assistance<br />

Act (STURAA) started <strong>Federal</strong> support for capital<br />

leasing. This was codified into law by TEA-21 and<br />

remained unchanged in SAFETEA-LU.<br />

Grantees may use <strong>Federal</strong> funds for capital<br />

assistance for up to 80 percent of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cost of<br />

acquiring transit assets by lease. A capital lease can<br />

be used to purchase capital equipment such as<br />

vehicles, or it can be used to purchase a combinati<strong>on</strong><br />

of capital and maintenance services such as chassis<br />

rebuilding and engine/drive train replacement.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!