Press Freedom and Globalisation - International Press Institute
Press Freedom and Globalisation - International Press Institute
Press Freedom and Globalisation - International Press Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Press</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Globalisation</strong><br />
rural people benefit less from this plurality. 158 That is also the case in Ug<strong>and</strong>a where<br />
community <strong>and</strong> non-commercial radios were most vulnerable to the boradcasting fees. 159<br />
Limitations on publishing due to national interests are common worldwide. The<br />
East African level is considered to be more restricted than in Western countries, but not<br />
very different from other poor countries. 160 Collective interests are typically formulated as<br />
public peace, hate speech as well as protecting morality <strong>and</strong> religion. 161 For instance,<br />
Kenya is more conservative than Ug<strong>and</strong>a in exposing body <strong>and</strong> sex, which makes a<br />
distinction in practice of publishing in the two countries. 162 Another collective value is<br />
democracy in itself. That is the reason for media to allow all parts to contribute in the<br />
public debate. The practice of this principle can be discussed. However, Kenyan media<br />
emphasise such an ideal in the very beginning of the Kenyan Code of Conduct of<br />
Journalism. 163<br />
Private interests may include both private institutions <strong>and</strong> individuals. There is<br />
danger of mixing private <strong>and</strong> national interests when the elite of political leaders <strong>and</strong><br />
business peoples are the same ones. 164 In East Africa, liberalisation of broadcasting has<br />
increased number of licenses. Yet, these radio <strong>and</strong> TV channels are concentrated in a few<br />
political h<strong>and</strong>s. 165 Another example is when the radio station Kiss FM in programs in April<br />
2004 used rough words about some Kenyan ministers as individuals. The ministers wanted<br />
to use government instruments as withdrawing of the licence to stop the radio station. 166<br />
158<br />
Carver, Coliver, Lauriciano, Lush <strong>and</strong> Maja-Pearce, Who Rules the Airwaves, p. 6.<br />
159<br />
Nakkazi, “Ug<strong>and</strong>a Cracks Down on Radio, TV Stations”<br />
160<br />
Walden, Ruth, “Insult Laws” in World Bank, The Right To Tell : The Role of Mass Media in Economic<br />
Development (Washington: The World Bank/WBI Development Studies, 2002), pp. 212 <strong>and</strong> 220-222.<br />
161<br />
Krug <strong>and</strong> Price, “The Legal Environment for News Media”, pp. 200-201.<br />
162<br />
Onyango-Obbo, Charles, “Ug<strong>and</strong>ans like dirty pictures, so why faint at the V-word?” in The East African<br />
(Nairobi: Nation Media Group), commentary, 28th February, 2005.<br />
163<br />
The Media Council of Kenya, Code of Conduct <strong>and</strong> Practice of Journalism in Kenya, p. 2.<br />
164<br />
An-na’im, “The <strong>Freedom</strong> of Expression as a Universal Human Right”, pp. 22-24.<br />
165<br />
Kadhi, “Anglophone Africa: Puppets of the proprietors?”, pp. 120-122.<br />
166<br />
Daily Nation, “They want to kill Kiss FM, says Kalonzo” in Daily Nation (Nairobi: Nation Media Group),<br />
news article, 20 th April, 2004; <strong>and</strong> Shikwati, James, “It’s a potential threat to <strong>Press</strong> freedom” in Daily Nation<br />
(Nairobi: Nation Media Group), commentary, 22 nd April, 2004.<br />
104