Press Freedom and Globalisation - International Press Institute
Press Freedom and Globalisation - International Press Institute
Press Freedom and Globalisation - International Press Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Press</strong> <strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Globalisation</strong><br />
images, <strong>and</strong> information are dispersed across the United States <strong>and</strong><br />
throughout the world.” 134<br />
This policy serves both political <strong>and</strong> economic ends in the United States. Due to American<br />
media’s influence on the whole world, all business elites with shared interests benefit from<br />
this policy.<br />
To legitimise <strong>and</strong> stabilise existing political order can be another purpose of press<br />
freedom. A problem that arises is whether these media are true in their criticism or if the<br />
criticism is modest not to jeopardise an existing order that media benefit from. 135 When an<br />
issue is covered <strong>and</strong> opponents <strong>and</strong> experts on all sides are interviewed, the given image is<br />
a critical coverage. In reality, however, arguments which do not fit into the case, or<br />
opponents who are critical are left out of the debate. In that way, the press cultivate debates<br />
within a mainstream framework. Such debates sound critical <strong>and</strong> legitimate decision<br />
processes. In this way an effect of “critical journalism” can be to hide important views.<br />
Hence, the press contributes to support an existing system. Globally, international news<br />
media create similar legitimising conditions for the current world order. 136<br />
When the purpose for press freedom is to maintain the existing system, press<br />
freedom can be subordinated to other considerations. An example of this logic is how press<br />
freedom has been subordinated to regulations to support war on terrorism. It has been<br />
justified by the purpose which is to protect democracy. In that way press freedom has been<br />
subordinated to protection of democracy as a superior purpose. 137<br />
The NWICO debates in the 1970s <strong>and</strong> 80s, illustrate an early resistance to how<br />
global media support rich countries. 138 Among poor countries a sense of being excluded<br />
134<br />
United States’ Department of Commerce, Globalization of the Mass Media, p. 1.<br />
135<br />
Patterson, “The United States: News in a Free-Market Society”, p. 252.<br />
136<br />
Shiller, Robert J., “Irrational Exuberance in the Media” in World Bank, The Right To Tell : The Role of<br />
Mass Media in Economic Development (Washington: The World Bank/WBI Development Studies,<br />
2002), pp. 83-86.<br />
137<br />
Elliott, Deni, “Terrorism, Global Journalism <strong>and</strong> the Myth of the Nation State” in Journal of Mass Media<br />
Ethics (New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004), volume 19, number 1, pp. 42-43.<br />
138<br />
Abubakar, “The Mass Media <strong>and</strong> Ideological Apparatuses in Post-Colonial Africa”, p. 56.<br />
49