26.10.2013 Views

History in the new South Africa: an introduction - Det danske ...

History in the new South Africa: an introduction - Det danske ...

History in the new South Africa: an introduction - Det danske ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

15 The l<strong>an</strong>guage question. The struggle between English<br />

<strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r official <strong>an</strong>d unofficial l<strong>an</strong>guages<br />

By Kwesi Kwaa Prah<br />

Introduction<br />

It is often forgotten that historically <strong>the</strong> tensions between l<strong>an</strong>guage groups <strong>in</strong> <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong><br />

have prom<strong>in</strong>ently featured <strong>the</strong> struggles between Afrika<strong>an</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d English. This was culturally a<br />

signific<strong>an</strong>t str<strong>an</strong>d <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> conflict, which led to <strong>the</strong> war between Boer <strong>an</strong>d Brit, <strong>the</strong> Anglo-Boer<br />

War (1899-1902). Indeed, this is what <strong>the</strong> white Afrik<strong>an</strong>ers have called <strong>the</strong> taal-stryd. The<br />

struggle to assert <strong>the</strong> usage of Afrika<strong>an</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> face of English hegemony cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

years follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Anglo-Boer War. In 1906, <strong>the</strong> English Cape Town <strong>new</strong>spaper The Cape<br />

Times could condescend<strong>in</strong>gly write that; “Afrika<strong>an</strong>s is <strong>the</strong> confused utter<strong>an</strong>ce of halfarticulated<br />

patois.” Afrika<strong>an</strong>s was often denigrat<strong>in</strong>gly described as a kombuis taal (a kitchen<br />

l<strong>an</strong>guage), referr<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> fact that it was a l<strong>an</strong>guage used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> kitchen by serv<strong>an</strong>ts <strong>an</strong>d<br />

slaves. Sensitivities aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> social power of English was strik<strong>in</strong>gly registered <strong>in</strong> 1913<br />

when <strong>the</strong> Boer leader Steyn cabled <strong>the</strong> Kaapsch Taalfeest <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g words; “… <strong>the</strong><br />

l<strong>an</strong>guage of <strong>the</strong> conqueror <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mouth of <strong>the</strong> conquered is <strong>the</strong> l<strong>an</strong>guage of <strong>the</strong> slaves.”<br />

Afrika<strong>an</strong>s was accepted as a school subject <strong>in</strong> 1914, recognized by <strong>the</strong> church <strong>in</strong> 1916-19, at<br />

university level <strong>in</strong> 1918, <strong>an</strong>d completely by both chambers of parliament at a jo<strong>in</strong>t sitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

1925. Possibly, no s<strong>in</strong>gle personality <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 20 th century served <strong>the</strong> object of elevat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Afrika<strong>an</strong>s to equality with English as C.J. L<strong>an</strong>genhoven.<br />

Thus when <strong>the</strong> Afrik<strong>an</strong>er elite came <strong>in</strong>to power <strong>in</strong> 1948, <strong>the</strong>y brought with <strong>the</strong>m a historical<br />

baggage <strong>an</strong>d a collective memory of cultural rivalry aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> English. They proceeded<br />

rapidly <strong>in</strong> all areas of social life to catch up with <strong>the</strong> social, economic <strong>an</strong>d cultural gap<br />

between English-speak<strong>in</strong>g white <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> <strong>an</strong>d Afrika<strong>an</strong>s-speak<strong>in</strong>g white <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>.<br />

This process was carried out on <strong>the</strong> backs of <strong>the</strong> non-white population. The process of<br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g cultural <strong>an</strong>d l<strong>in</strong>guistic supremacy, more or less, cont<strong>in</strong>ued un<strong>in</strong>terruptedly until<br />

1976, when <strong>Africa</strong>n school children <strong>in</strong> Soweto decisively rejected <strong>an</strong>d revolted aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> use<br />

of Afrika<strong>an</strong>s as a medium of <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>in</strong> schools. This protest aga<strong>in</strong>st Afrika<strong>an</strong>s as<br />

L<strong>an</strong>guage of Instruction (LOI) under Apar<strong>the</strong>id marked a watershed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> history of<br />

Apar<strong>the</strong>id fascism <strong>in</strong> <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>. It <strong>an</strong>nounced to <strong>the</strong> world <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />

Apar<strong>the</strong>id.<br />

Forced removals <strong>an</strong>d “gr<strong>an</strong>d apar<strong>the</strong>id” from <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> 1960s made <strong>the</strong> non-white<br />

population to various degrees “<strong>in</strong>visible”. They were geographically <strong>an</strong>d physically kept away<br />

from specified areas dur<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> hours of <strong>the</strong> day. However, this policy of enforced<br />

physical <strong>in</strong>visibility was matched by <strong>an</strong> equally pernicious policy of selective cultural<br />

<strong>in</strong>visibility. Cultural visibility was only tolerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> B<strong>an</strong>tust<strong>an</strong>s/Homel<strong>an</strong>ds. It was on <strong>the</strong><br />

basis of <strong>the</strong>se Homel<strong>an</strong>ds, as territorial units <strong>in</strong> which specific <strong>Africa</strong>n l<strong>an</strong>guages were spoken<br />

that <strong>the</strong> concept of quasi-<strong>in</strong>dependence was developed. By <strong>the</strong> late 1970s <strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

<strong>the</strong> 1980s <strong>the</strong> Homel<strong>an</strong>ds <strong>an</strong>d <strong>the</strong> picture of <strong>the</strong> l<strong>an</strong>guages spoken <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>m was as follows:<br />

• Tr<strong>an</strong>skei (Xhosa) – declared <strong>in</strong>dependent on 26 October 1976<br />

• Ciskei (also Xhosa) – declared <strong>in</strong>dependent on 4 December 1981<br />

• Bophuthatsw<strong>an</strong>a (Tsw<strong>an</strong>a) – declared <strong>in</strong>dependent on 6 December 1977<br />

• Venda (Venda) – declared <strong>in</strong>dependent 13 September 1979<br />

• KwaZulu (Zulu)<br />

• KwaNdebele (Ndebele)<br />

165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!