Desktop Environmental, Hydrological and Geotechnical Study

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 15 Qualitative risk assessment, PSP Area 25 Source Activity Contaminant Critical Receptor Pathway Structures (with possible asbestos, lead based paint and septic tanks) Structures (with possible asbestos, lead based paint and septic tanks) Structures (with possible asbestos, lead based paint and septic tanks) Structures (with possible asbestos, lead based paint and septic tanks) Abandoned vehicles, equipment and debris Lead, asbestos, hazardous materials, pesticides, herbicides, faecal coliforms Lead, asbestos, hazardous materials, pesticides, herbicides, faecal coliforms Lead, asbestos, hazardous materials, pesticides, herbicides, faecal coliforms Lead, asbestos, hazardous materials, pesticides, herbicides, faecal coliforms Heavy metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, solvents, asbestos Groundwater Surface water Flora and Fauna Services/ Infrastructure Human (Current Site Users) Permeation through Soil Profile Perched Groundwater Flow, Surface run-off Leaching and uptake Permeation through Soil Profile Dermal Contact, Ingestion, Inhalation Potential Effects Groundwater Contamination Surface Water Contamination Toxic, phytotoxic Physical and chemical damage to structures Toxic, Carcinogenic, Hazardous to Human Health Potential Consequence of Contaminant- Receptor Linkage Project 230243-001-01 | File 20120912 PSP25 Desktop 230243.docx | 13 September 2012 | Revision 2 p 30 Likelihood of Source- Receptor Linkage Risk Classification Severe Possible Moderate Severe Unlikely Low Moderate Unlikely Low Mild Very Unlikely Negligible Severe Possible Moderate Comments
Table 15 Qualitative risk assessment, PSP Area 25 Source Activity Contaminant Critical Receptor Pathway Abandoned vehicles, equipment and debris Abandoned vehicles, equipment and debris Abandoned vehicles, equipment and debris Abandoned vehicles, equipment and debris Abandoned vehicles, equipment and debris Heavy metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, VOCs, asbestos Heavy metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, VOCs, asbestos Heavy metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, VOCs, asbestos Heavy metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, VOCs, asbestos Heavy metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, VOCs, asbestos Human (Future Site Users including construction workers) Human (Adjacent Site Users) Groundwater Surface Water Flora and Fauna Dermal Contact, Ingestion, Inhalation Dermal Contact, Ingestion, Inhalation Permeation through Soil Profile Perched Groundwater Flow, Surface run-off Leaching and uptake Potential Effects Toxic, Carcinogenic, Hazardous to Human Health Toxic, Carcinogenic, Hazardous to Human Health Groundwater Contamination Surface Water Contamination Toxic, phytotoxic Potential Consequence of Contaminant- Receptor Linkage Project 230243-001-01 | File 20120912 PSP25 Desktop 230243.docx | 13 September 2012 | Revision 2 p 31 Likelihood of Source- Receptor Linkage Risk Classification Severe Likely High Severe Unlikely Low Severe Possible Moderate Severe Possible Moderate Moderate Possible Moderate Comments Risk of exposure to construction workers
Page 1: Precinct Structure Plan Area 25 Gro
Page 4 and 5: 3.1.1 Certificates of title 14 3.1.
Page 6 and 7: Glossary of terms AEC Area of Envir
Page 8 and 9: Recommendations for assessment of i
Page 10 and 11: There is an Urban Floodway Zone (UF
Page 12 and 13: • Compilation of known groundwate
Page 14 and 15: 2. Site identification 2.1 Location
Page 16 and 17: Table 1 Site property details No. A
Page 18 and 19: Sodosols are a soil order of the Au
Page 20 and 21: Table 2 Summary of key geotechnical
Page 22 and 23: 2.13.4 Groundwater resources and us
Page 24 and 25: 3. Records review 3.1 Search of pub
Page 26 and 27: Table 7 Aerial photograph review su
Page 28 and 29: Table 7 Aerial photograph review su
Page 30 and 31: The potential for off-site sources
Page 32 and 33: Table 9 Summary of site AECs Areas
Page 34 and 35: • Organochlorine and organophosph
Page 36 and 37: Table 12 Derivation of risk classes
Page 38 and 39: Table 15 Qualitative risk assessmen
Page 48 and 49: 6. Summary 6.1 Site contamination R
Page 50 and 51: Categories and 1994 Wetland Categor
Page 52 and 53: 7.2 Geotechnical It is recommended
Page 54 and 55: Table 16 Assessment recommendations
Page 56 and 57: Table 16 Assessment recommendations
Page 58 and 59: 8. References Australian and New Ze

Desktop Environmental, Hydrological and Geotechnical Study

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?