27.10.2013 Views

FINAL REPORT - FSD Kenya

FINAL REPORT - FSD Kenya

FINAL REPORT - FSD Kenya

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

There have been a number of initiatives recently to develop and strengthen social protection through<br />

cash transfers to the poorest and most vulnerable households in <strong>Kenya</strong>. A small pilot project has<br />

already started to make small cash transfers to households with orphans and vulnerable children<br />

(OVC). This pilot will be significantly extending over the course of 2007. If successful, the aim is to<br />

scale this up to reach national coverage by 2010. A second pilot project is planned to develop a cash<br />

based hunger safety net (HSN) system focused on vulnerable households in the arid and semi-arid<br />

lands (ASAL) which are subject to regular drought. DFID is simultaneously supporting the<br />

development of an integrated national social protection framework, which seeks to provide a more<br />

comprehensive programme of appropriate and cost-effective social transfers aimed at reducing extreme<br />

poverty, increasing the poorest’s access to basic services, reducing risk and generating growth.<br />

The main objective of the market research was to create a profile of the needs for, usage of and<br />

attitudes towards financial services, especially payment services, among current and potential recipients<br />

of OVC and HSN schemes. This report covers the results of a market research exercise carried out in<br />

Kwale, Garissa, Nairobi and Suba in November and December 2006.<br />

The research team used focus groups discussions (FGDs) and the following participatory rapid<br />

appraisal (PRA) tools and to collect data 1 . They also reviewed secondary information and statistical<br />

reports on the five districts that formed part of the background information for each district report.<br />

KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

FINDINGS FROM GARISSA<br />

1. Difficulties in Garissa and among respondents<br />

ii. Garissa is prone to drought and floods and temperatures are very high ranging from 20 o C to<br />

38 o C. Apart from the areas along the Tana, the rest of Garissa is generally arid with poorly<br />

drained soils and low levels of rainfalls that cannot support farming. The main source of<br />

livelihood in Garissa district is nomadic pastoralism, but when there is drought or floods,<br />

animals die, leaving people with no source of livelihoods. When calamities occur, such as loss<br />

of cattle through drought or floods, Garissa town becomes the catchment area for such people<br />

who need employment or relief support.<br />

iii. Poor infrastructure (roads, hospitals, schools and telephone connectivity) in remote parts of<br />

Garissa causes difficulties in terms of cost of transportation and communication. Furthermore,<br />

the absence of infrastructural facilities like electricity hinders development of programmes in<br />

these remote areas. For example, mobile telephone connectivity ends 10kms away from Garissa<br />

town; road connections with towns such as Balambala and Dertu are some times non-existent<br />

and formal financial institutions including KPOSB are only found in Garissa town. This has<br />

pushed people to concentrate areas surrounding water points, market centres or areas with<br />

basic services like hospitals and schools.<br />

1 See Annex 2.6.3 on tools used<br />

iv

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!