09.11.2013 Views

Upsetting the Offset - Transnational Institute

Upsetting the Offset - Transnational Institute

Upsetting the Offset - Transnational Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Foreword<br />

The Business of Carbon is Different<br />

Sunita Narain<br />

Climate change is clearly <strong>the</strong> biggest challenge our world has ever faced. It is<br />

now clear that if <strong>the</strong> world does not find ways of reducing its emissions of<br />

greenhouse gases drastically, it is faced with deadly catastrophe. What is also<br />

clear is that this task is not easy, because <strong>the</strong> emissions are linked to growth. The<br />

challenge, <strong>the</strong>refore, is to reinvent economic growth so that it does not cost us<br />

<strong>the</strong> earth.<br />

This is why <strong>the</strong> world needs <strong>the</strong> business of carbon. It is a business, which<br />

works to reduce <strong>the</strong> carbon intensity of economies across <strong>the</strong> world. It is also a<br />

business, where it makes sense to ‘avoid’ pollution, not to first pollute and <strong>the</strong>n<br />

clean up. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> business is about investing in <strong>the</strong> opportunities,<br />

which re-engineer growth so that it is more efficient and less dependent on<br />

fossil fuels.<br />

But this business of carbon, we must remember, is not about business as<br />

usual. It is about ensuring that <strong>the</strong> world takes effective steps to reduce<br />

emissions. This will mean that <strong>the</strong> business must not fall into <strong>the</strong> trap of cheap<br />

or corrupt emissions reduction deals. It must not become (as is <strong>the</strong> current<br />

practice) a simple market mechanism – an agreement between private parties<br />

looking to make a fast buck. I believe that <strong>the</strong> design of <strong>the</strong> Clean Development<br />

Mechanism (CDM) is flawed because it promotes really creative carbon<br />

accounting projects. It is also designed to keep prices low and so it forces <strong>the</strong><br />

South to discount its advantage in reducing emissions. It is designed to invest in<br />

<strong>the</strong> small change and not in high end technological options which would<br />

drastically reduce pollution. In this way, it does little to seriously or effectively<br />

combat climate change. This is unacceptable.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> corporate world has to be part of <strong>the</strong> solution, as I believe it must,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n it must partner in <strong>the</strong> idea of <strong>the</strong> new tomorrow, which is both equitable<br />

and sustainable. Let us be clear, climate change teaches us that <strong>the</strong>re are limits to<br />

growth as we know it. It also teaches us that <strong>the</strong> world is one; if <strong>the</strong> rich world<br />

pumped excessive quantities of carbon dioxide into <strong>the</strong> atmosphere yesterday,<br />

<strong>the</strong> emerging rich world will do so today. It also tells that we must build<br />

technological and economic futures which will share <strong>the</strong> benefits of growth with<br />

all. Without fairness and equity, cooperation will not be possible. The bottom<br />

line is that if climate change is <strong>the</strong> market’s biggest failure, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> market (as it<br />

works today) cannot be <strong>the</strong> solution.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!