09.11.2013 Views

Upsetting the Offset - Transnational Institute

Upsetting the Offset - Transnational Institute

Upsetting the Offset - Transnational Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Upsetting</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Offset</strong><br />

that baseline and not punishing those that do not. At <strong>the</strong> moment we have<br />

concocted a ‘carbon poverty trap’ whereby a country limits its availability for<br />

getting CDM projects if it improves its emissions reduction policies. A policy<br />

giving credits to countries that improve <strong>the</strong>ir policies and enforce <strong>the</strong>m – such<br />

as by streng<strong>the</strong>ning <strong>the</strong> national building codes – could change that.<br />

Finally, an exciting new instrument is now on <strong>the</strong> table. Its aim is not to help<br />

rich countries to avoid making sufficient reductions at home but to help finance<br />

voluntary reduction actions in developing countries. The NAMA’s (National<br />

Appropriate Mitigation Action) was introduced by South Korea a couple of<br />

years ago. It is a voluntary system where developing countries can report to a<br />

register which projects <strong>the</strong>y are going to carry out. These NAMA are eligible for<br />

up front support from credit-short rich countries which in turn are able to<br />

purchase credits achieved by documented resulting reductions.<br />

Let this book bring home to <strong>the</strong> world <strong>the</strong> huge problems created by <strong>the</strong><br />

CDM and spur <strong>the</strong> effort to reform it. We must get away from business as usual<br />

in <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> CDM works. Just as importantly, let it be remembered that CDM<br />

can only be one aspect of <strong>the</strong> architecture of managing climate change. We must<br />

also continue to work on real sustainable development involving changes in<br />

lifestyle, production forms, housing, transportation, forestry and agriculture.<br />

Instead of offsetting its responsibilities, <strong>the</strong> richer countries need to take a lead<br />

in bringing about real changes at home. This is <strong>the</strong>ir historical duty, given that<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are mostly responsible for creating <strong>the</strong> problem of climate change in <strong>the</strong><br />

first place. But of course <strong>the</strong>re is no point for <strong>the</strong> rich world to clean up its act,<br />

if <strong>the</strong> developing world just reproduces a development model that literally will<br />

‘cost <strong>the</strong> earth’.<br />

My hope is that <strong>the</strong> Copenhagen conference will bring <strong>the</strong> world closer<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r and back on a track that leads us not to chaos, but to a brighter, more<br />

equitable and sustainable future.<br />

359

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!