23.12.2013 Views

View/Open - Aaltodoc

View/Open - Aaltodoc

View/Open - Aaltodoc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.3 Gentrification vs.<br />

Vacancy<br />

Opposed to the oversupply of certain<br />

types of spaces, a scarcity is created<br />

with ease. Through means of creating<br />

a demand, attention is drawn to a<br />

previously uninteresting area, which has<br />

severe implications on the habitants.<br />

In places which have gone through a<br />

transformation in terms of usage and users,<br />

gentrification can occur. This happens when<br />

the former users are forced to leave, due<br />

to increased costs and changes to local<br />

services. Brand (1995) handles this topic in<br />

his book and TV-series in the chapter “The<br />

Low Road”. He explains the situation as one<br />

in which worthless spaces are occupied by<br />

people, often with creative activities going<br />

on, who are in time forced to leave due to<br />

interest of property developers. Because<br />

of the roughness and unimportance of the<br />

space, there is much freedom in what to<br />

do there. He describes attics, basements,<br />

sheds and garages, cottages, and old<br />

industrial or warehouse buildings as being<br />

such “Low Road” spaces. The space can<br />

be used and adjusted as one pleases.<br />

“When artists move in to an industrial<br />

neighborhood like this, a predictable<br />

sequence occurs. They make the place<br />

exciting and spruce it up. Pretty soon,<br />

there are trendy nightclubs, restaurants<br />

and shops. That makes it a fashionable<br />

place to live. Developers move in, and<br />

convert the live-work studios to upscale<br />

apartments. Goodbye artists. [...]<br />

Economic activity follows Low Road<br />

activity.” (Brand 1997)<br />

elsewhere. Brand continues to say that this<br />

is an endless cycle, as the banished will<br />

occupy another place in a similar situation.<br />

1.3.1 Obsolete<br />

buildings<br />

When a building has been vacated, and<br />

no new user can be found, the building can<br />

be considered obsolete: it no longer serves<br />

a purpose and is outdated. In such cases<br />

it is likely that the building remains empty,<br />

and thus it should be considered whether it<br />

is worth to keep the building or if it should<br />

be demolished. In either case the CO2<br />

emissions should be taken into account.<br />

Studies have shown that it is more energy<br />

efficient to renovate, than it is to completely<br />

demolish a building and construct a new<br />

one (Alter 2013, Empty Homes 2008,<br />

Biggelaar 2012, interview August 13th).<br />

This includes both construction impact and<br />

operation emissions. When maintaining the<br />

building, a suitable new function ought to be<br />

found. Taking a quick look into what types<br />

of buildings fall into this category, we find<br />

mostly old industrial sites. Referred to often<br />

as ‘brownfields’, they have gone through<br />

a long period of intensive use, possibly<br />

involving a certain degree of pollution. In<br />

the cases where the pollution has caused<br />

the soil or groundwater to be contaminated,<br />

remediation is necessary before the area<br />

can be taken back into use. This leads<br />

to costly and lengthy procedures, which<br />

influences the willingness of developers<br />

to take on such a redevelopment project.<br />

It is not impossible however, and many<br />

redeveloped brownfields have become<br />

an asset to their surroundings, taking<br />

an example from the renowned Tate<br />

Gallery in London, in the former Bankside<br />

Power Station (Forton, Kelly et al. 2011).<br />

When the decision is made to demolish<br />

a building, the opportunity arises to build<br />

an entirely new building, which can<br />

comply with the current energy efficiency<br />

regulations. The design can be made with<br />

the latest materials, and also refurbished<br />

materials from a demolished building can<br />

be used. However, demolition would mean<br />

destroying a piece of history. Emotional<br />

attachment and memories are often left out<br />

of such decisions. Demolition furthermore<br />

creates a peak in the carbon emissions<br />

(Empty Homes 2008), on top of those<br />

emitted during the building phase and<br />

use phase. Upon building a new structure<br />

where the old one once stood, these<br />

emissions can be added up to those of the<br />

previous building. According to the 2008<br />

study (Empty Homes) the lower embedded<br />

energy and emissions of the new building<br />

alone do not outweigh the emissions of<br />

making and consequently keeping the<br />

previously obsolete building operational.<br />

Because of these creatives’ approachability,<br />

and ability to draw others to the area, the<br />

location becomes interesting to developers<br />

and eventually to higher income classes.<br />

Consequently the area becomes too<br />

expensive for those who functioned as the<br />

activators, who will then have to move<br />

18 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!