23.12.2013 Views

View/Open - Aaltodoc

View/Open - Aaltodoc

View/Open - Aaltodoc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.3 Gentrification vs.<br />

Vacancy<br />

Opposed to the oversupply of certain<br />

types of spaces, a scarcity is created<br />

with ease. Through means of creating<br />

a demand, attention is drawn to a<br />

previously uninteresting area, which has<br />

severe implications on the habitants.<br />

In places which have gone through a<br />

transformation in terms of usage and users,<br />

gentrification can occur. This happens when<br />

the former users are forced to leave, due<br />

to increased costs and changes to local<br />

services. Brand (1995) handles this topic in<br />

his book and TV-series in the chapter “The<br />

Low Road”. He explains the situation as one<br />

in which worthless spaces are occupied by<br />

people, often with creative activities going<br />

on, who are in time forced to leave due to<br />

interest of property developers. Because<br />

of the roughness and unimportance of the<br />

space, there is much freedom in what to<br />

do there. He describes attics, basements,<br />

sheds and garages, cottages, and old<br />

industrial or warehouse buildings as being<br />

such “Low Road” spaces. The space can<br />

be used and adjusted as one pleases.<br />

“When artists move in to an industrial<br />

neighborhood like this, a predictable<br />

sequence occurs. They make the place<br />

exciting and spruce it up. Pretty soon,<br />

there are trendy nightclubs, restaurants<br />

and shops. That makes it a fashionable<br />

place to live. Developers move in, and<br />

convert the live-work studios to upscale<br />

apartments. Goodbye artists. [...]<br />

Economic activity follows Low Road<br />

activity.” (Brand 1997)<br />

elsewhere. Brand continues to say that this<br />

is an endless cycle, as the banished will<br />

occupy another place in a similar situation.<br />

1.3.1 Obsolete<br />

buildings<br />

When a building has been vacated, and<br />

no new user can be found, the building can<br />

be considered obsolete: it no longer serves<br />

a purpose and is outdated. In such cases<br />

it is likely that the building remains empty,<br />

and thus it should be considered whether it<br />

is worth to keep the building or if it should<br />

be demolished. In either case the CO2<br />

emissions should be taken into account.<br />

Studies have shown that it is more energy<br />

efficient to renovate, than it is to completely<br />

demolish a building and construct a new<br />

one (Alter 2013, Empty Homes 2008,<br />

Biggelaar 2012, interview August 13th).<br />

This includes both construction impact and<br />

operation emissions. When maintaining the<br />

building, a suitable new function ought to be<br />

found. Taking a quick look into what types<br />

of buildings fall into this category, we find<br />

mostly old industrial sites. Referred to often<br />

as ‘brownfields’, they have gone through<br />

a long period of intensive use, possibly<br />

involving a certain degree of pollution. In<br />

the cases where the pollution has caused<br />

the soil or groundwater to be contaminated,<br />

remediation is necessary before the area<br />

can be taken back into use. This leads<br />

to costly and lengthy procedures, which<br />

influences the willingness of developers<br />

to take on such a redevelopment project.<br />

It is not impossible however, and many<br />

redeveloped brownfields have become<br />

an asset to their surroundings, taking<br />

an example from the renowned Tate<br />

Gallery in London, in the former Bankside<br />

Power Station (Forton, Kelly et al. 2011).<br />

When the decision is made to demolish<br />

a building, the opportunity arises to build<br />

an entirely new building, which can<br />

comply with the current energy efficiency<br />

regulations. The design can be made with<br />

the latest materials, and also refurbished<br />

materials from a demolished building can<br />

be used. However, demolition would mean<br />

destroying a piece of history. Emotional<br />

attachment and memories are often left out<br />

of such decisions. Demolition furthermore<br />

creates a peak in the carbon emissions<br />

(Empty Homes 2008), on top of those<br />

emitted during the building phase and<br />

use phase. Upon building a new structure<br />

where the old one once stood, these<br />

emissions can be added up to those of the<br />

previous building. According to the 2008<br />

study (Empty Homes) the lower embedded<br />

energy and emissions of the new building<br />

alone do not outweigh the emissions of<br />

making and consequently keeping the<br />

previously obsolete building operational.<br />

Because of these creatives’ approachability,<br />

and ability to draw others to the area, the<br />

location becomes interesting to developers<br />

and eventually to higher income classes.<br />

Consequently the area becomes too<br />

expensive for those who functioned as the<br />

activators, who will then have to move<br />

18 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!