25.12.2013 Views

Designing Brand Personality Using the Power of Archetypes ...

Designing Brand Personality Using the Power of Archetypes ...

Designing Brand Personality Using the Power of Archetypes ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Designing</strong> <strong>Brand</strong> <strong>Personality</strong> <strong>Using</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Power</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archetypes</strong><br />

Bachelor Paper I/II<br />

Submitted by:<br />

Registration no: 0810278850<br />

at<br />

Bachelor‘s v Programme<br />

‚Business Consultancy International‘<br />

Marketing and Sales<br />

Supervisor:<br />

Wiener Neustadt, 20.10.2010


Declaration <strong>of</strong> Integrity<br />

I hereby confirm,<br />

1. that I have written <strong>the</strong> essay at hand independently, that I have not<br />

used any sources or materials o<strong>the</strong>r than those stated, nor availed<br />

myself <strong>of</strong> any unauthorized resources, and<br />

2. that I have not submitted this essay in any form as an examination<br />

paper before, nei<strong>the</strong>r in this country, nor abroad.<br />

3. that <strong>the</strong> electronic copy <strong>of</strong> this essay and <strong>the</strong> printed version are<br />

identical.<br />

Wiener Neustadt,<br />

December 21, 2010<br />

Date<br />

Signature<br />

- I -


Abstract in English:<br />

Opposed to <strong>the</strong> functional advantages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> product, <strong>the</strong> brand has to distinguish<br />

itself from o<strong>the</strong>rs to be successful. In order to connect to <strong>the</strong> consumer, vie with <strong>the</strong><br />

competition and to achieve <strong>the</strong> strategic goals, <strong>the</strong> company has to develop an<br />

independent identity. This brand identity is almost impossible to copy. The key facet <strong>of</strong><br />

brand identity is <strong>the</strong> brand personality (Jansen 2006), a set <strong>of</strong> human characteristics<br />

associated with <strong>the</strong> brand(Aaker 1997).<br />

There is a number <strong>of</strong> approaches that analyzed <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> creating <strong>the</strong> brand<br />

personality. However, <strong>the</strong> increasing disappointment with traditional customer<br />

research is causing greater tolerance <strong>of</strong> non-traditional ideas. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, reaching<br />

into <strong>the</strong> past, is <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> archetypes.<br />

In this paper I focused on strategies how to design a brand personality for a company.<br />

It is concerned with <strong>the</strong> topic on both <strong>the</strong>oretical and empirical level. In <strong>the</strong><br />

introductory part it defines <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> brand personality as a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> brand<br />

identity, researches and compares different <strong>the</strong>ories in brand creation. The main body<br />

<strong>of</strong> this paper analyzes <strong>the</strong> steps <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> setting <strong>the</strong> relevant archetype and<br />

demonstrates <strong>the</strong> strategy <strong>of</strong> creating brand personality by means <strong>of</strong> archetypes.<br />

Finally <strong>the</strong>re is a case study as an application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paper.<br />

The overall goal <strong>of</strong> my work is to interpret a complex view on <strong>the</strong> given topic, richly<br />

illustrated by examples and applications.<br />

Keywords (at least 3, max. 6):<br />

<strong>Brand</strong> personality, archetypes, big five dimensions, Gameboard, Jung, Aaker<br />

Abstract in German:<br />

Im Gegensatz zu den funktionalen Vorteilen eines Produktes muss sich die<br />

Marke von anderen Marken unterscheiden, um erfolgreich zu sein. Um mit dem<br />

Verbraucher in Verbindung zu treten, mit der Konkurrenz zu wetteifern und<br />

die strategischen Ziele zu erreichen, muss das Unternehmen eine<br />

eigenständige Identität entwickeln. Der Schlüsselaspekt der Markenidentität ist<br />

die sogenannte Markenpersönlichkeit (Jansen 2006), eine Gruppe menschlicher<br />

Eigenschaften, die mit der Marke verbunden sind (Aaker 1997).<br />

Der zunehmende Verdruss über die Ergebnisse der traditionellen Kundenforschung<br />

führt jedoch zu einer größeren Toleranz unkonventioneller Ideen. Eine davon ist die<br />

ursprüngliche Theorie über die Archetypen.<br />

In meiner Bachelorarbeit werde ich mich auf die Strategien konzentrieren,<br />

die sich mit der Bildung einer Markenpersönlichkeit für ein Unternehmen<br />

befassen. In der Einleitung wird die Rolle der Markenpersönlichkeit als ein Teil der<br />

Markenidentität definiert, weiter werden verschiedene Theorien der Markenbildung<br />

untersucht und verglichen. Im Hauptteil analysiere ich die Schritte bei der Festlegung<br />

des entsprechenden Archetyps und stelle die Strategie der Bildung von<br />

Markenpersönlichkeit mittels Archetypen dar. Jeder Schritt in diesem Teil wird anhand<br />

eines praktischen Beispiels illustriert. Das Hauptziel meiner Arbeit ist, das<br />

vorgegebene Thema in seiner Komplexität darzustellen und mit Beispielen und<br />

Anwendungsmöglichkeiten zu belegen.<br />

Keywords (at least 3, max. 6):<br />

<strong>Brand</strong> personality, Archetypen, fünf Dimensionen, Gameboard, Jung, Aaker<br />

- II -


Table <strong>of</strong> Contents<br />

INTRODUCTION 1<br />

1. THE IMPORTANCE OF CREATING BRAND IDENTITY 2<br />

1.1 BRANDS WITH IDENTITY 2<br />

1.2 BRAND IDENTITY VS. BRAND PERSONALITY 3<br />

2. RESEARCH OF THE BRAND PERSONALITY 4<br />

2.1 ASSESSING AND MEASURING BRAND PERSONALITY 4<br />

2.1.1 Traditional Processes 4<br />

2.1.2 Non-traditional Processes 5<br />

2.2 EXISTING THEORIES FOR CREATING BRAND PERSONALITY 6<br />

2.2.1 The Former Scientific Methodologies and Scepticism 6<br />

2.2.2 Aaker‟s dimensions 6<br />

2.2.3 Jung‟s Behavioural Science 7<br />

3. USE OF ARCHETYPES IN THE BRAND CREATION 8<br />

3.1 DEFINING ARCHETYPES 8<br />

3.1.1 The Definition <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archetypes</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Past 8<br />

3.1.2 The Definition and Use <strong>of</strong> Jungian psychology today 9<br />

3.2 CATEGORIZATION OF ARCHETYPES 9<br />

3.2.1 Categorization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archetypes</strong> according to <strong>the</strong> company’s<br />

motivations: 12<br />

- III -


3.2.2 Categorization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archetypes</strong> within Specific Industry Sectors<br />

12<br />

3.2.3 Categorization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archetypes</strong> in different cultures 12<br />

4. STEPS IN CREATING BRAND PERSONALITY 13<br />

4.1 DEFINING THE COMPANY‟S VALUES 13<br />

4.2 SETTING THE BRAND POSITIONING 14<br />

4.3 MATCHING THE VALUES AND POSITIONING WITH ARCHETYPES 15<br />

4.4 ADVERTISING AND EVALUATION ACCORDING TO THE CHOSEN ARCHETYPE 16<br />

5. THE CASE STUDY – PANTENE PRO V 17<br />

6. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 19<br />

LIST OF FIGURES 21<br />

LIST OF TABLES 22<br />

BIBLIOGRAPHY 23<br />

APPENDIX 25<br />

- IV -


Introduction<br />

Opposed to <strong>the</strong> functional advantages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> product, <strong>the</strong> brand has to distinguish<br />

itself from o<strong>the</strong>rs to be successful. In order to connect to <strong>the</strong> consumer, vie with <strong>the</strong><br />

competition and to achieve <strong>the</strong> strategic goals, <strong>the</strong> company has to develop an<br />

independent identity. This brand identity is almost impossible to copy. The key facet <strong>of</strong><br />

brand identity is <strong>the</strong> brand personality (Jansen 2006), a set <strong>of</strong> human characteristics<br />

associated with <strong>the</strong> brand(Aaker 1997).<br />

There is a number <strong>of</strong> approaches that analyzed <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> creating <strong>the</strong> brand<br />

personality. However, <strong>the</strong> increasing disappointment with traditional customer<br />

research is causing greater tolerance <strong>of</strong> non-traditional ideas. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, reaching<br />

into <strong>the</strong> past, is <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> archetypes.<br />

In this paper I am going to focus on strategies how to design a brand personality for a<br />

company. It is concerned with <strong>the</strong> topic on both <strong>the</strong>oretical and empirical level. In <strong>the</strong><br />

introductory part it defines <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> brand personality as a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> brand<br />

identity, researches and compares different <strong>the</strong>ories in brand creation. The main body<br />

<strong>of</strong> this paper analyzes <strong>the</strong> individual steps <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> setting <strong>the</strong> relevant archetype and<br />

demonstrates <strong>the</strong> strategy <strong>of</strong> creating brand personality by means <strong>of</strong> archetypes. Each<br />

step in this part is also applied to a practical example.<br />

The overall goal <strong>of</strong> my work is to interpret a complex view on <strong>the</strong> given topic, richly<br />

illustrated by examples and applications.<br />

1


1. The Importance <strong>of</strong> Creating <strong>Brand</strong> Identity<br />

1.1 <strong>Brand</strong>s with Identity<br />

(Batey 2008) defined brand as a guarantee <strong>of</strong> a quality and trustworthy promise <strong>of</strong><br />

performance, consumer‟s perception and interpretation <strong>of</strong> a cluster <strong>of</strong> associated<br />

attributes, benefits and values. <strong>Brand</strong> has developed into a very valuable marketing<br />

concept over a past few decades.<br />

In order to connect to <strong>the</strong> consumer, vie with <strong>the</strong> competition and to achieve strategic<br />

goals, <strong>the</strong> company has to develop an independent identity for its brand. The<br />

consumer wants to identify with <strong>the</strong> brand and feels connected with it. Paraphrasing<br />

Kapfrerer in(Jansen 2006), “Having an identity means being who you are, following<br />

your own, determined, but individual path”.<br />

The ability to distinguish itself will increasingly need to come from <strong>the</strong> brand itself,<br />

because as opposed to <strong>the</strong> functional advantages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> product, <strong>the</strong> brand identity is<br />

almost impossible to copy. The brand personality is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> key facets <strong>of</strong> brand<br />

identity. (Jansen 2006) Associating <strong>the</strong> brand with <strong>the</strong> person, it saves consumers <strong>the</strong><br />

effort <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> brand quality considerations, claims (Chernatony 2006) in her book. The<br />

value added means no longer what <strong>the</strong> brand provides, but what it stands for<br />

symbolically. (Riesenbeck and Perrey 2007)<br />

At <strong>the</strong> turn <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> century <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> „identity‟ was <strong>the</strong> centre <strong>of</strong> attention. The<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> identity connected <strong>the</strong> „inside-out‟ way <strong>of</strong> thinking <strong>of</strong> corporate<br />

communication to <strong>the</strong> „outside-in‟ <strong>of</strong> marketing for years <strong>the</strong> predominant principle in<br />

business. (Cretu and Brodie 2007)<br />

An observation done by (Blanchart 2010) where he states: “A brand is a coherent set<br />

<strong>of</strong> ideas in your consumer‟s mind. It is a personification <strong>of</strong> a product, service or even<br />

an entire company.” Now brands are becoming more like people. Like a person, it has<br />

its name, identity, personality and reputation. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, (Temporal 2010) found<br />

out that <strong>the</strong> brand strength is highly correlated with <strong>the</strong> perception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> brand<br />

personality.<br />

2


1.2 <strong>Brand</strong> Identity vs. <strong>Brand</strong> <strong>Personality</strong><br />

What is <strong>the</strong> difference between brand identity and brand personality? (Jansen 2006)<br />

defined identity as “be who you are” and <strong>the</strong> personality “become who you should be”.<br />

So, <strong>the</strong> brand identity represents <strong>the</strong> active substance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> brand along with its<br />

enduring qualities reflected in a forward looking brand associations. As an outward<br />

expression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> brand, including its name and visual appearance is a fundamental<br />

means <strong>of</strong> consumer recognition and symbolizes <strong>the</strong> brand's differentiation from<br />

competitors.<br />

As mentioned above, <strong>the</strong> brand personality is <strong>the</strong> attribution <strong>of</strong> human personality<br />

traits to a brand as a way to achieve differentiation. Usually done through long-term<br />

above-<strong>the</strong>-line planning and advertising, appropriate packaging and graphics.<br />

Although human and brand personality may share similar conceptualization, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

differ in <strong>the</strong>ir formation. The human personality traits are based on individual<br />

behaviour, physical characteristics, attitudes and believes and demography.<br />

The brand personality traits are a readiness to think or act in a similar fashion in<br />

response to a variety <strong>of</strong> different stimuli or situations. (Schoormans 2009) showed<br />

that consumers prefer products with a personality that fit <strong>the</strong>ir own personality:<br />

extrovert consumers prefer extrovert products. Research fur<strong>the</strong>rmore has shown that<br />

people can recognize personality traits in products and brands.<br />

A consumer is a seeker <strong>of</strong> purely utilitarian benefit or a gain. In psychological terms,<br />

(Batey 2008) determined three major elements <strong>of</strong> a personality.<br />

Elements Drivers In <strong>the</strong> brand terms<br />

Private personality<br />

Public personality<br />

thoughts, feelings,<br />

ambitions, talents<br />

how I want o<strong>the</strong>rs to see<br />

me<br />

Overlaps <strong>the</strong> brand identity<br />

The external aim<br />

Attributed personality how o<strong>the</strong>rs see me The nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Table 1: Elements <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Personality</strong>, (Batey, 2008)<br />

personality<br />

3


2. Research <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Brand</strong> <strong>Personality</strong><br />

2.1 Assessing and Measuring <strong>Brand</strong> <strong>Personality</strong><br />

2.1.1 Traditional Processes<br />

Marketing pr<strong>of</strong>essionals had become a bit too much mechanical, using already<br />

standardized accepted rules <strong>of</strong> brand building and marketing communication.<br />

Marketing itself became a mass produced product, a commodity lacking spirit and<br />

au<strong>the</strong>nticity. The market research on brand personality was limited due to <strong>the</strong> blur<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> this concept and consumer preference kept being elusive. (Aaker 1997)<br />

More and more brand experts lacked <strong>the</strong> some generalizable scale to measure it. From<br />

<strong>the</strong> traditional efforts to measure and evaluate prevailed by ethnography. This is a<br />

scientific research strategy that studies people, ethnic groups and <strong>the</strong>ir material and<br />

spiritual culture. (Aaker 1997) points out that etnography ga<strong>the</strong>rs empirical data<br />

through ad hoc techniques, such as checklists, photo-sorts or symbolic.<br />

The focus shifted away from <strong>the</strong> stereotype marketing mantra: doing and<br />

communicating whatever <strong>the</strong> consumer wants according to research. Business and<br />

marketing pr<strong>of</strong>essionals started to pay attention to <strong>the</strong>ir own, company‟s and brand‟s<br />

inner values. (Schoormans 2009)<br />

Over <strong>the</strong> past fifty years <strong>the</strong> mentality and approach <strong>of</strong> companies has progressively<br />

evolved in several stages.<br />

Identity<br />

based<br />

Figure 1: Stages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Base in <strong>Brand</strong> <strong>Personality</strong> Design (Schoormans, 2009)<br />

There were two kinds <strong>of</strong> scales for measuring <strong>the</strong> bran personality, both relied on <strong>the</strong><br />

relationship between human and brand personality. The first was a ad hoc scale and<br />

was <strong>of</strong> an non-<strong>the</strong>oretical nature. This means <strong>the</strong> traits was selected arbitrarily. They<br />

were used only for fur<strong>the</strong>r researches. The second type was <strong>of</strong> a more <strong>the</strong>oretical<br />

nature, based on human personality traits not yet validated for <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> brands.<br />

Therefore those have also a questionable validity. (Aaker and Biel 1993)<br />

4


2.1.2 Non-traditional Processes<br />

Increasing disappointment with traditional customer research is causing greater<br />

tolerance <strong>of</strong> non-traditional ideas and making it more acceptable to talk about<br />

archetypes in mainstream business. Growing interest in archetypes signals a<br />

major transformation in marketers‟ attitudes about <strong>the</strong> misty regions behind <strong>the</strong><br />

curtains <strong>of</strong> consciousness. Everyone is looking for new answers.<br />

With functionality, reliability, convenience, or price no longer sufficing for<br />

differentiation, brands must compete on meaning. The best way to create “emotional<br />

affinity” through meaning is to use archetypal images to fulfil basic human desires or<br />

motivations and evoke deep emotions. 1 The narratives and meanings behind<br />

archetypes let customers relate to brands by making brands seem alive.(Pearson and<br />

Mark 2001)<br />

Very common methods for assessing brand personality are currently analogies (by<br />

qualitative depth interviews), drawings or free association. 2 A visual tool based<br />

research is one <strong>of</strong> possible ways how to determine <strong>the</strong> right brand personality.<br />

(Schoormans 2009) suggests that by visualizing and image presentation <strong>of</strong> main<br />

personality traits we can avoid deviations in interpretations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> verbal concepts.<br />

Especially compared with verbal language, visual image represents <strong>the</strong> information<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> spatial, non-arbitrary and continuous characteristics.<br />

Gradually, a selected group <strong>of</strong> applicants chooses <strong>the</strong> most fitting images to <strong>the</strong><br />

associations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company. The aim is to develop not one, but more personalities for<br />

<strong>the</strong> brand: valid view on <strong>the</strong> brand personality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> own brand, on an ideal brand<br />

personality for <strong>the</strong> brand, on <strong>the</strong> brand personality <strong>of</strong> competitors and on <strong>the</strong> brand<br />

personality as seen by customers.<br />

Next, (Riesenbeck and Perrey 2007) used <strong>the</strong> Gameboard Model proposed by<br />

McKinsey. It is designed to map <strong>the</strong> celebrities and <strong>the</strong> brand portfolios in a certain<br />

category to highlight affinities. (see Figure 2 and fur<strong>the</strong>r description in <strong>the</strong> section 4)<br />

1 For <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> archetypes ,see <strong>the</strong> section 3.<br />

2 The methods are discussed in more detail in section 4.<br />

5


2.2 Existing Theories for Creating <strong>Brand</strong> <strong>Personality</strong><br />

2.2.1 The Former Scientific Methodologies and Scepticism<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most famous philosophers Rene Descartes claims in his books, that <strong>the</strong><br />

pure mind has no connection to <strong>the</strong> body. This implies that only when pure mind<br />

operates independently <strong>of</strong> emotions is <strong>the</strong> mental output credible. “I think <strong>the</strong>refore I<br />

am”. But growing stream <strong>of</strong> research undermines this paradigm. The neurologist<br />

(Damasio 1994) monitored his patients and concluded that brains cannot form models<br />

<strong>of</strong> self and relationship with self to <strong>the</strong> world beyond <strong>the</strong>ir bodies. He set <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> philosophy oppositely:”I am. Therefore I think.”<br />

Cognitive scientists have always argued that <strong>the</strong> consciousness is <strong>the</strong> sensation <strong>of</strong> self.<br />

The philosophy behind this claim is that <strong>the</strong> immaterial thought in our minds is linked<br />

to <strong>the</strong> material substance in our bodies – emotionally based consumer thinking.<br />

2.2.2 Aaker’s dimensions<br />

In her research (Aaker 1997) developed a <strong>the</strong>oretical framework <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> brand<br />

personality construct by determining <strong>the</strong> number and nature <strong>of</strong> five dimensions. Each<br />

<strong>Brand</strong><br />

<strong>Personality</strong><br />

Sincerity Excitement Competence Sophistication Ruggedness<br />

Down to Earth<br />

Daring<br />

Reliable<br />

Upper Class<br />

Outdoorsy<br />

Honest<br />

Spirited<br />

Intelligent<br />

Charming<br />

Though<br />

Wholesome<br />

Imaginative<br />

Successful<br />

Cheerful<br />

Up-to-Date<br />

Table 2: "Big Five" Dimensions and <strong>the</strong>ir Facets (Aaker, 1997)<br />

6


<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dimensions has its own facets drivers. The main objective was to identify brand<br />

personality dimensions as perceived in consumer minds ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> individual<br />

differences among responses <strong>of</strong> people to <strong>the</strong> brands. framework and <strong>the</strong> scale are<br />

generalizable across all product categories.<br />

The model was based on <strong>the</strong> “Big Five” human personality dimensions<br />

(Extraversion/introversion, Agreeableness, Consciousness, Emotional stability and<br />

Culture). Whereas agreeableness and sincerity both innate part <strong>of</strong> warmth and<br />

acceptance, extroversion and excitement capture <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> social ability, energy and<br />

activity and conscientiousness and competence both connote dependability,<br />

responsibility and security. According to (Aaker and Biel 1993), her sincerity,<br />

excitement and competence shape human personality, sophistication and ruggedness<br />

indicates to <strong>the</strong> dimension that individuals want but not necessarily have. This<br />

encapsulates a focus on <strong>the</strong> upper class, sexy and glamorous.<br />

The model was developed for <strong>the</strong> American market. However, brands carry cultural<br />

meaning - specific personality traits among cultures. To answer to <strong>the</strong> cross-cultural<br />

differences (Aaker 1997) redefined her model for Japan and Spain. Fur<strong>the</strong>r research<br />

was conducted by o<strong>the</strong>r researchers, who explored Germany, Italy, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands,<br />

and Korea. Although, <strong>the</strong> models all are culturally secific, <strong>the</strong>y all show resemblance to<br />

Aaker‟s five-factor model that is still <strong>the</strong> most widely used brand personality model on<br />

worldwide scale.<br />

2.2.3 Jung’s Behavioural Science<br />

Carl Jung, a Swiss psychiatrist studied dreams. He pioneered <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> archetypes<br />

in early 90s. Already at that time he found out that some <strong>the</strong>mes recurring in <strong>the</strong><br />

dreams <strong>of</strong> people everywhere – <strong>the</strong>y were universal <strong>the</strong>mes and characters that are<br />

found in myth and legend. His pr<strong>of</strong>ound observations showed that this inward<br />

experience was essentially <strong>the</strong> same in all human beings - sharing <strong>the</strong> same instincts,<br />

<strong>the</strong> same impulses, conflicts or fears. These <strong>the</strong>mes, in one word archetypes, are<br />

short-cuts to eternal truths. 3<br />

“<strong>Personality</strong> is <strong>the</strong> supreme realization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> innate idiosyncrasy <strong>of</strong> a living being. It is<br />

an act <strong>of</strong> courage flung in <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> life, <strong>the</strong> absolute affirmation <strong>of</strong> all that<br />

constitutes <strong>the</strong> individual, <strong>the</strong> most successful adaptation to <strong>the</strong> universal conditions <strong>of</strong><br />

existence, coupled with <strong>the</strong> greatest possible freedom <strong>of</strong> self-determination.”(Jung<br />

1963)<br />

3 For <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> archetypes, see <strong>the</strong> section 3.<br />

7


In comparison with Aaker, Jungarian <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> archetypes has different perspective on<br />

human behaviour. It based <strong>the</strong> drivers <strong>of</strong> customer consumption on universal<br />

predetermined human patterns latent in all human beings. (Heding, Knudtzen, and<br />

Bjerre 2008)<br />

Jung in his work <strong>of</strong> art (Jung 1963)divided our psyche into three levels:<br />

1. Ego – conscious mind<br />

2. Personal unconscious - subjects that can become conscious, like memories<br />

3. Collective unconscious - psychic inheritance, experiences as species, knowledge<br />

as we were born with<br />

“<strong>Archetypes</strong> are characteristic patterns that pre-exist in <strong>the</strong> collective psyche <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

human race that repeat <strong>the</strong>mselves eternally in <strong>the</strong> psyche <strong>of</strong> individual human beings<br />

and determine <strong>the</strong> basic ways that we perceive and function as psychological<br />

beings.”(Jung 1963)<br />

In our brains, <strong>the</strong>y work as dispositions in clusters <strong>of</strong> dispositional neurons. These<br />

neurons <strong>the</strong>n respond to <strong>the</strong> given stimuli by creating moods and relationships<br />

towards <strong>the</strong> stimuli. For example for caring for us (no matter if in real life or simulated<br />

in advertising), we develop <strong>the</strong> love chemical oxytocin, which uplifts our mood.<br />

Therefore a marketer should perceive <strong>the</strong> dispositional neurons as <strong>the</strong> trigger <strong>of</strong><br />

predisposed responses to <strong>the</strong> content <strong>of</strong> his message. (Wolfe 2003)<br />

On <strong>the</strong> Jung‟s foundation was based <strong>the</strong> widely used Meyer Briggs personality<br />

assessment. It uses DRM – Developmental Relationship Marketing, using archetypal<br />

structures that predispose attributes <strong>of</strong> behaviour. DRM is <strong>the</strong>n most effective when is<br />

based on consumers commonalities, ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong>ir differences. (Pearson and Mark<br />

2001)<br />

3. Use <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archetypes</strong> in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Brand</strong> Creation<br />

3.1 Defining <strong>Archetypes</strong><br />

3.1.1 The Definition <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archetypes</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Past<br />

An original model or type after which o<strong>the</strong>r similar things are patterned; a prototype:<br />

"'Frankenstein' , 'Dracula' , 'Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde' , <strong>the</strong> archetypes that have<br />

influenced all subsequent horror stories" (New York Times).<br />

8


The original pattern or model from which all things <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same kind are copied or on<br />

which <strong>the</strong>y are based; a model or first form; prototype.<br />

3.1.2 The Definition and Use <strong>of</strong> Jungian psychology today<br />

In Jungian psychology, an inherited pattern <strong>of</strong> thought or symbolic imagery derived<br />

from <strong>the</strong> past collective experience and present in <strong>the</strong> individual unconscious.<br />

“<strong>Archetypes</strong> are like riverbeds which dry up when <strong>the</strong> water deserts <strong>the</strong>m, but<br />

which can be found again at any time. Archetype is like an old watercourse<br />

along which <strong>the</strong> water <strong>of</strong> life has flowed in this channel, <strong>the</strong> more likely it is, <strong>the</strong><br />

sooner or later <strong>the</strong> water will return to its old bed.”(Jung 1963)<br />

<strong>Archetypes</strong> are forms or images <strong>of</strong> a collective nature worldwide as constituents <strong>of</strong><br />

myths and as individual products <strong>of</strong> unconscious. These are imprinted and hardwired<br />

into our psyches.<br />

A collectively inherited unconscious idea, pattern <strong>of</strong> thought or image, universally<br />

present in individual psyches. Jung divided our psyche into three levels:<br />

1. Ego – conscious mind<br />

2. Personal unconscious - subjects that can become conscious, like memories<br />

3. Collective unconscious - psychic inheritance, experiences as species, knowledge<br />

as we were born with<br />

3.2 Categorization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archetypes</strong><br />

A detailed <strong>the</strong>ory and definitions according to <strong>the</strong> Swiss psychologist Mr. Jung and<br />

mentioning <strong>the</strong> main traits <strong>of</strong> his 12 archetypes as an important stream in our pop<br />

culture. (Damasio 1994)<br />

The best way to create “emotional affinity” through meaning is to use archetypal<br />

images to fulfil “basic human desires and motivations and [evoke] deep emotions and<br />

yearnings”. (Pearson and Mark 2001) The narratives and meanings behind archetypes<br />

let customers relate to brands by making brands seem alive. The authors list 12<br />

archetypes arranged along 4 groups <strong>of</strong> motivations. Each archetype fulfils a deepseated<br />

need:<br />

Motivation <strong>Archetypes</strong> Drivers<br />

Stability and<br />

Control<br />

Creator Craft something new, non-conformist, selfexpression,<br />

endeavored to tap into <strong>the</strong> human<br />

imagination, led by vision, creating something<br />

9


tangible and endurable, give consumers choices,<br />

achieve immortality, innovative in artistic and design<br />

Belonging and<br />

Enjoyment<br />

Risk and<br />

Mastery<br />

Caregiver<br />

Ruler<br />

Jester<br />

Regular<br />

Person<br />

Lover<br />

Hero<br />

Outlaw<br />

One <strong>of</strong> most powerful archetypes, trusted, an icon <strong>of</strong><br />

home, security and continuity, pure natural and<br />

gentle, altruist, moved by compassion, generosity,<br />

and desire to help o<strong>the</strong>rs, feared <strong>of</strong> instability, hold<br />

promise <strong>of</strong> innocence, empathy, communication,<br />

consistency,<br />

Exerts control, leader, role model, administrator,<br />

knows what‟s good for people, avoids uncontrollable<br />

change, high-status products to enhance power, lays<br />

down <strong>the</strong> category law, standards, <strong>the</strong> ideal<br />

behaviour, security and stability in chaotic world<br />

Has fun, energy, irreverence, mischief, desire for<br />

change, interaction, great brand identification,<br />

impulsive, spontaneous, present, ridicule category<br />

conventions, dismiss <strong>of</strong> self-important and overconfident,<br />

established brands<br />

Be fine with self, down to earth, friendly and<br />

supportive brands, unselfish, helpful, gives people a<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> belonging, or being part <strong>of</strong> a group,<br />

environment where everyone knows your name<br />

Give/find love, romantic and glamorous, dreamlike,<br />

dashing, chivalrous, sensual, experiences joy, delight<br />

& ecstasy, sex and seduction, idealist, longing for a<br />

better world<br />

Act courageously, strong, inspirational, motivational<br />

and disciplined, shows what‟s possible if we believe,<br />

represents power, honour, success and victory ,<br />

create innovations that will have a major impact on<br />

<strong>the</strong> world and can solve a major social problem<br />

Breaks <strong>the</strong> rules, rebel, challenges <strong>the</strong> convection,<br />

release <strong>of</strong> pent-up passions, lets us out <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong><br />

stream, helps retain values, paves <strong>the</strong> ways for<br />

revolutionary new attitudes, excitement from being<br />

10


“bad”, admired, but powerful and feared.<br />

Independence<br />

and<br />

Fulfilment<br />

Magician<br />

Innocent<br />

Affects transformation <strong>of</strong> idea into material reality,<br />

evokes amazement through intuition, makes<br />

impossible happen, exotic or ancient origin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

product, dynamic change <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> category, highly<br />

innovative<br />

Retain/renew faith, feminine, seeking for <strong>the</strong> good in<br />

life, potential <strong>of</strong> beauty in all things, spontaneous,<br />

trusting dependent child, nostalgic, tapping into<br />

strongly into <strong>the</strong> emotions, purity, goodness,<br />

morality, simplicity, straightforward values, seen as<br />

truthful, honest and reliable<br />

Explorer Au<strong>the</strong>ntic, pioneer, individual, own values,<br />

challenges to try new, independent, self sufficient,<br />

adventurous, daring, represents self-discovery, lifealtering<br />

experiences, trial, promotes new products,<br />

something <strong>the</strong>y believe in<br />

Sage Understand <strong>the</strong> world, thoughtful, independent<br />

attitude, represents wisdom, asceticism, freedom and<br />

destiny, tells <strong>the</strong> truth, original, holds own opinion,<br />

need for autonomy, enlightens consumers, provide<br />

expertise or information, or encourage customers to<br />

think.<br />

Table 3:The Hero and <strong>the</strong> Outlaw, Building Extraordinary <strong>Brand</strong>s through <strong>the</strong> <strong>Power</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Archetypes</strong> from Centre for Archetypal Studies and Applications(Pearson and Mark 2001)<br />

11


3.2.1 Categorization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archetypes</strong> according to <strong>the</strong> company’s<br />

motivations:<br />

Company motivation/driver<br />

Change, Risk<br />

Belonging, Care<br />

Structure<br />

Discovery, Knowledge<br />

Archetype<br />

Outlaw, magician, jester<br />

Regular guy, caregiver, lover<br />

Ruler ,hero, creator<br />

Sage, Explorer, Innocent<br />

Table 4 Categorization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archetypes</strong> according to <strong>the</strong> Company's Motivation<br />

3.2.2 Categorization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archetypes</strong> within Specific Industry Sectors<br />

<strong>Archetypes</strong> can be used to understand <strong>the</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> category my brand<br />

operates in. Once a deep research done, <strong>the</strong> variables <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> industry sector and its<br />

product categories within become clear. We ei<strong>the</strong>r apply <strong>the</strong> archetypes which are<br />

commonly used in <strong>the</strong> category, or use <strong>the</strong>m as an distinguishing element to <strong>the</strong><br />

competition.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> great examples <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> strategic use <strong>of</strong> archetypes is politics. Selecting from<br />

twelve archetypes, <strong>the</strong> respondents in <strong>the</strong> research chose four equally weighted<br />

character qualities for <strong>the</strong> ideal leader: Caregiver, Hero, Sage and Regular Guy. A<br />

leader composed from a mixture from <strong>the</strong>se archetypes can provide clarity <strong>of</strong> vision,<br />

intelligence and analytical competence, while being genuine, practical and empa<strong>the</strong>tic<br />

to <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people.<br />

3.2.3 Categorization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archetypes</strong> in different cultures<br />

The focus will be given especially on comparison <strong>of</strong> cultures determined by <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

nature. The application <strong>of</strong> archetypes is based on <strong>the</strong> traits that are predominated in<br />

<strong>the</strong> specific country. Roughly, we can divide countries according to several areas:<br />

1. Collectivistic vs. Individualistic<br />

2. Past and Present orientation<br />

3. High context vs. Low Context<br />

4. <strong>Power</strong> distance<br />

For example In collectivistic countries where people value <strong>the</strong> interdependence,<br />

similarity and conformity, consumers are likely to choose brands similar to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

group-members. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, in <strong>the</strong> countries <strong>of</strong> individualistic culture, in which<br />

12


<strong>the</strong> autonomy, independence and uniqueness in dominant, consumers ra<strong>the</strong>r use<br />

brands to express <strong>the</strong>ir difference from <strong>the</strong> group-members.<br />

Overall, this implies that <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> archetypes is independent from <strong>the</strong> cultures across<br />

<strong>the</strong> world. The Aaker‟s model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new “Big Five” dimensions was developed for <strong>the</strong><br />

American market. However, brands carry cultural meaning, moreover specific<br />

personality traits among cultures. To answer to <strong>the</strong> cross-cultural differences Aaker<br />

gradually redefined her model for Japan and Spain. Fur<strong>the</strong>r research was conducted by<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r researchers, who explored various brand personality models for different<br />

Western and Eastern countries. Although, <strong>the</strong> models all have <strong>the</strong>ir cultural specificity,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y all show resemblance to <strong>the</strong> model on worldwide scale.<br />

4. Steps in Creating <strong>Brand</strong> <strong>Personality</strong><br />

A brand without a personality has no warmth and <strong>the</strong> consumer will treat it likewise,<br />

no loyalty and high price sensitivity. Therefore <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> creating a strong brand<br />

identity is long approach <strong>of</strong> searching and finding company‟s values and goals as well<br />

as defining <strong>the</strong> reason <strong>the</strong> company <strong>of</strong>fers for its customer to choose it instead <strong>of</strong> its<br />

competition.<br />

The personality traits are associated in both direct and indirect ways. The former is<br />

done by company‟s employees, <strong>the</strong> CEO and <strong>the</strong> brand product endorsers. The letter<br />

implies to <strong>the</strong> product category associations, product-related attributes, brand name,<br />

advertising style, symbol or logo, price and distribution channel. Going step by step<br />

through <strong>the</strong> procedure bellow helps us to be consistent in creating a great personality<br />

with a long-lasting effect in sales and customer satisfaction.<br />

4.1 Defining <strong>the</strong> Company’s Values<br />

I order to create a powerful and long-lasting brand, first we need a strong foundation.<br />

In a corporate terms, <strong>the</strong> foundation is a set <strong>of</strong> company‟s values. This means, to<br />

define ways in which all organization‟s member will work toge<strong>the</strong>r. They include<br />

beliefs about teamwork, commitment to quality, integrity and customer orientation.<br />

When planning <strong>the</strong>m, we should avoid vague statements <strong>of</strong> intent, ra<strong>the</strong>r state<br />

concrete action plans, detailed timing and accomplishment criteria. By doing this we<br />

ensure that <strong>the</strong> values are shared on both, <strong>the</strong> corporate and job-specific level, to<br />

make <strong>the</strong>m come alive.<br />

The next step would be outlining <strong>the</strong> external appearance to <strong>the</strong> customer – <strong>the</strong> brand<br />

values – to streng<strong>the</strong>n and reinforce <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> corporate values. (Jansen 2006) As<br />

13


an example, if <strong>the</strong> reliability was a corporate value, <strong>the</strong> brand value could be<br />

dependability.<br />

The company values and <strong>the</strong> brand personality should be clearly defined, without<br />

using any pr<strong>of</strong>essional lingo. By simple words create a lively picture <strong>of</strong> a personality<br />

that is absolutely clear to anyone. Avoiding <strong>the</strong> strategic words that are too abstract to<br />

manage a brand in daily business we avoid also <strong>the</strong> strict guidelines that are too<br />

inflexible. The characteristic is to be also multi-dimensional, which means,<br />

concentrating on more traits at <strong>the</strong> same time, to create more powerful and richer<br />

image in peoples‟ minds.<br />

In case, <strong>the</strong> corporate and brand values do not match, it might cause confusion among<br />

both, <strong>the</strong> employees and <strong>the</strong> customer. Therefore <strong>the</strong> integration and <strong>the</strong> transparency<br />

<strong>of</strong> information among involved people at all levels is required. When developing an<br />

extensive training, is by analyzing <strong>the</strong> behaviour <strong>of</strong> employees who have been<br />

identified as performing to very high standard on a particular value.<br />

4.2 Setting <strong>the</strong> <strong>Brand</strong> Positioning<br />

Setting <strong>the</strong> marketing positioning and <strong>the</strong> brand positioning are close related terms,<br />

but does not mean <strong>the</strong> same.<br />

As briefly mentioned earlier in section 2, <strong>the</strong> Gameboard by McKinsey (Riesenbeck and<br />

Perrey 2007)enables to easily identify <strong>the</strong> brand positioning according to <strong>the</strong> brand<br />

personality. It lists archetypes describing brands in <strong>the</strong>ir entirety, method <strong>of</strong> multidimensional<br />

scaling to map bran personalities and <strong>the</strong>ir interdependencies. The<br />

distance between points reflects <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> similarity <strong>of</strong> perceived pr<strong>of</strong>iles. The<br />

distance from <strong>the</strong> edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gameboard indicates <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> uniqueness.<br />

Particularly this Gameboard mirrors <strong>the</strong> positions <strong>of</strong> selected brands in German market<br />

alongside with <strong>the</strong> personalities <strong>of</strong> contemporary celebrities. The closer <strong>the</strong> brand to a<br />

certain person, <strong>the</strong> stronger <strong>the</strong> brand perceived in terms <strong>of</strong> this characteristic relative<br />

to companies.<br />

As example: L‟Oreal represents Charm <strong>the</strong>refore inclines to <strong>the</strong> personality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

celebrity <strong>of</strong> Julia Roberts.<br />

14


Figure 2:McKinsey <strong>Brand</strong> <strong>Personality</strong> Gameboard Map<br />

<strong>Using</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gameboard we specify also <strong>the</strong> position <strong>of</strong> our competitors‟ personalities. By<br />

knowing <strong>the</strong> competitive landscape from this perspective, it makes us easier to<br />

differentiate. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand by <strong>the</strong> help <strong>of</strong> Gameboard we determine partnerships<br />

according to <strong>the</strong>ir values, resulting in high synergies in both parties.<br />

The model is used mainly:<br />

1. as a first step by mergers, acquisitions and consolidations<br />

2. by designing <strong>the</strong> brand architecture and umbrella brand management<br />

3. setting dimensions <strong>of</strong> brand personality<br />

4.3 Matching <strong>the</strong> Values and Positioning with <strong>Archetypes</strong><br />

The positioning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> brand has to be credible an achievable and to embody <strong>the</strong> brand<br />

promise. Therefore if <strong>the</strong> positioning is reliable and good manners and honesty, as its<br />

core traits it must also be reflected in appearance and behaviour <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sales team.<br />

Not instead being a wild bunch <strong>of</strong> spirited passionate fellows.<br />

(Schoormans 2009) showed that consumers prefer products with a personality that fit<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir own personality: extrovert consumers prefer extrovert products. Research<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>rmore has shown that people can recognize personality traits in products and<br />

15


ands. It is probable that due to <strong>the</strong> abstractness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> brand personality, different<br />

stakeholders have a different interpretation <strong>of</strong> personality traits might be suboptimal 4 .<br />

By means <strong>of</strong> qualitative in-depth interviews, as mentioned in section 2 we aim to<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> concrete personality traits using archetypes as stereotypes. There is a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> methods how to achieve this.<br />

1. Analogies – a cognitive process <strong>of</strong> transferring information or meaning from a<br />

particular subject (<strong>the</strong> analogue or source) to ano<strong>the</strong>r particular subject (<strong>the</strong><br />

target)<br />

2. Drawings – <strong>the</strong> visual image first appeared in our mind when hearing <strong>the</strong> brand<br />

in some context<br />

3. Free associations – a stimulation <strong>of</strong> an associative pattern by a word or <strong>the</strong><br />

connection and production <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r words in response to a given word, done<br />

spontaneously as a game, creative technique, or in a psychiatric evaluation.<br />

4.4 Advertising and Evaluation according to <strong>the</strong> Chosen<br />

Archetype<br />

Generally, <strong>the</strong> advertising are to increase <strong>the</strong> awareness and promote products by<br />

audio-visual communication. In case <strong>of</strong> advertising with <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> archetypes, <strong>the</strong><br />

main principle is that <strong>the</strong> thoughts that arise in consumer minds do not rise<br />

consciousness only. They tend to work in <strong>the</strong> background, shaping <strong>the</strong> consumer‟s<br />

archetypal reactions to those ads. Those are <strong>the</strong> stereotypic ways <strong>the</strong> marketer<br />

expects according to <strong>the</strong> predetermined behaviour towards <strong>the</strong> specific<br />

archetype.(Wolfe 2003)<br />

After completing <strong>the</strong> process <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> brand personality design, it is<br />

necessary to ask a number <strong>of</strong> important questions, which help us check, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

direction <strong>of</strong> our approach matched <strong>the</strong> overall business and marketing strategy. Do our<br />

brand values and personalities „fit‟ with <strong>the</strong> archetypal values outlined? Is <strong>the</strong>re any<br />

disparity in communication? What is my archetype‟s vice? What does this say about<br />

my brand? What are <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r archetypes within <strong>the</strong> category? The process <strong>of</strong><br />

evaluation is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most significant steps in creating a meaningful and aligned<br />

brand personality.<br />

4 Not <strong>the</strong> highest standard or quality.<br />

16


5. The Case Study – Pantene Pro V<br />

5.1 Company background<br />

When P&G bought <strong>the</strong> brand Pantene, <strong>the</strong>re was no brand in hair care that was bigger<br />

than a 5% share, and <strong>the</strong> category leader basically changed every three years. After a<br />

complete re-launch <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> brand identity, 20% share has been achieved with <strong>the</strong><br />

category leadership for 15 years. Now let us take a look into <strong>the</strong>ir concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

archetypal brand personality strategy.<br />

5.2 <strong>Designing</strong> <strong>the</strong> brand personality step by step<br />

The challenge was to go beyond <strong>the</strong> left brain, <strong>the</strong> product attributes, to create an<br />

emotional connection with <strong>the</strong>ir consumers, based on an breakthrough idea. The<br />

emotional contribution that <strong>the</strong> brand brings is completely anchored into what <strong>the</strong><br />

product does. When Pantene transforms women‟s‟ hair, she feels inspired to turn an<br />

everyday moment into a shining moment.<br />

1. Defining company‟s values<br />

The Pantene‟s values can be characterized as innovation, nature and transformation.<br />

This all should be applied not only to <strong>the</strong>ir marketing strategy, but to <strong>the</strong> principal<br />

corporate motivation that drives employees on each organizational level. Everyone in<br />

<strong>the</strong> company knows <strong>the</strong>ir main objectives: <strong>the</strong> commitment to help women in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

search for beauty, bring <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> true beauty, allow <strong>the</strong>m to be transformed to be<br />

strong and confident as <strong>the</strong>y want to be. (Pantene updated 2010)<br />

2. Setting <strong>the</strong> positioning<br />

The Pantene shampoos were repositioned from regular hair care products into a set <strong>of</strong><br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional hair styling treatment. When choosing <strong>the</strong> archetype, Pantene instead <strong>of</strong><br />

following competition in <strong>the</strong> category by being ei<strong>the</strong>r Caregiver, Innocent or Lover,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y positioned <strong>the</strong>mselves as Magician. An dynamic transformer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unimaginable<br />

to <strong>the</strong> real. They can promise women‟ dreams come true using <strong>the</strong>ir products. The use<br />

<strong>of</strong> this brand personality serves as an effective differentiator. This archetype was<br />

aligned with a strategic target group <strong>of</strong> young women. They represent <strong>the</strong> symbol <strong>of</strong> a<br />

change and are <strong>the</strong>mselves less reluctant to change.<br />

The brand department tried to reconnect <strong>the</strong> hair to <strong>the</strong> woman, because a woman<br />

wants beautiful hair as an expression <strong>of</strong> her own beauty, she doesn‟t want it to have a<br />

life <strong>of</strong> its own that exists separate from her. She wants it to express who she is.<br />

17


Moreover <strong>the</strong>y separate <strong>the</strong>ir portfolio <strong>of</strong> shampoos into 7 categories so that <strong>the</strong>y can<br />

make each woman happy and confident. The categories: Fine Hair Solutions, Medium-<br />

Thick Hair Solutions, Colour Hair Solutions, Curly Hair Series, Classic Care Solutions,<br />

Restoratives and Nature Fusion.<br />

Here is <strong>the</strong> new Pantene marketing campaign: “Think your hair is too rough and tough<br />

to tame? Put Pantene Smooth and Strong to <strong>the</strong> test and your hair will have found its<br />

match. It gently detangles your unruly hair making it smooth and strong so you can be<br />

<strong>the</strong> boss again! Pantene's nourishing Pro-V shampoo formula with Amino-S, when<br />

used with Pantene Pro-V conditioner helps evenly restructure hair from root to tip<br />

detangling your unruly hair making it strong, silky and noticeably smoo<strong>the</strong>r in 10 days<br />

or less! Pantene is <strong>the</strong> first step to irresistibly smooth hair”. (Pantene updated 2010)<br />

bringing Pantene values to life:<br />

Sense <strong>of</strong><br />

Self-<br />

Respect <strong>of</strong><br />

Friendship,<br />

Self-belief<br />

Enjoyment<br />

well being<br />

respect<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

warmth<br />

<strong>of</strong> life<br />

Feel good<br />

Innovative<br />

Feel good<br />

Feel good<br />

about self<br />

formula<br />

about self<br />

about self<br />

Good mood<br />

On top <strong>of</strong><br />

Help to<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

On top <strong>of</strong><br />

things<br />

shine among<br />

relate to me<br />

things<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

better<br />

More<br />

Feel healthy<br />

Feel<br />

More<br />

More time<br />

Make a good<br />

confident<br />

refreshed<br />

confident<br />

for o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

impression<br />

outgoing<br />

things<br />

Look<br />

Gives self<br />

Quick visible<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

good/ look<br />

confidence<br />

change<br />

design effect<br />

best<br />

Feel clean Neat touch Wow effect Easier to<br />

work with<br />

hair<br />

Feel clean<br />

Makes hair<br />

Makes hair<br />

Immediate<br />

No<br />

La<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

Conditions<br />

feel clean/<br />

s<strong>of</strong>t silky,<br />

effect<br />

residue/<br />

hair<br />

hair/<br />

smell nice<br />

weighty<br />

easy rinse<br />

quickly<br />

treats hair<br />

shiny<br />

Table 5 Hierarchical Value Map for Shampoo Category<br />

3. Advertising in accordance with <strong>the</strong> brand personality<br />

18


Advertising concentrated mainly on <strong>the</strong> “wow” hair visuals. Expressing <strong>the</strong> Magician<br />

archetype is clear and coherent across all advertising vehicles. (see <strong>the</strong> Figure 4 and<br />

Figure 3). From mass media communication through direct advertising <strong>the</strong> message<br />

evokes imagery and sophisticated innovation. Use <strong>of</strong> famous endorsers, such as<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> key personality promoting tools is <strong>the</strong> product design. Everyone connects<br />

<strong>the</strong> brand with <strong>the</strong> characteristic pearl bottle with new logo including golden hair in it.<br />

Next, <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> endorsers plays an incredible role in <strong>the</strong> advertising.<br />

6. Conclusion and Recommendations<br />

(Aaker and Biel 1993)authors <strong>of</strong> Building Strong <strong>Brand</strong>s, say: "One way to be more<br />

efficient in marketing is just to do things right <strong>the</strong> first time around. It starts with<br />

getting <strong>the</strong> identity right. If you have a brand identity that works, you‟re just<br />

monumentally efficient.”<br />

This paper attempted to illustrate <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> how imbuing personality into a<br />

brand can enhance consumer bonding and <strong>the</strong> interaction between consumer self and<br />

<strong>the</strong> brand personality. Creating a coherent personality through <strong>the</strong> wide array <strong>of</strong> brand<br />

activities is done by ensuring that brand personality is expressed in all <strong>the</strong> behavior<br />

and communication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> brand. It is necessary to pay a close attention to pioneer<br />

brand users and target consumers, because as described in <strong>the</strong> chapters <strong>of</strong> this paper<br />

<strong>the</strong> brand personality is created through a cyclical interaction between <strong>the</strong> brand and<br />

consumers.<br />

By analyzing several processes for creating <strong>the</strong> brand personality I expressed <strong>the</strong> need<br />

for <strong>the</strong> new non-traditional ideas in <strong>the</strong> brand personality research comparing <strong>the</strong>m to<br />

<strong>the</strong> traditional customer researches. Pr<strong>of</strong>oundly I focused on <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> archetypes<br />

and <strong>the</strong>ir application to <strong>the</strong> brands in different industry sectors and cultures.<br />

The different techniques to discover archetypes and making clear connections between<br />

a key archetypal persona and <strong>the</strong> preliminary brand- product- or consumer-related<br />

findings can put an entirely new spin on study insights and next steps with <strong>the</strong>se<br />

benefits:<br />

1. Provide revolutionary yet imaginative mean for <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> a new or <strong>the</strong> recreation<br />

<strong>of</strong> an existing brand‟s personality and essence<br />

2. Introduce and fur<strong>the</strong>r explore new dimensions <strong>of</strong> a creative campaign once <strong>the</strong><br />

right archetype is established<br />

3. Generate new, breakthrough ideas in unexpected ways by using a comparative<br />

archetypal approach<br />

19


4. Develop and evaluate new products, creative concepts, and strategic marketing<br />

tactics for deeper resonance and motivation<br />

Last but not least, both internal and external variables are manipulated systematically<br />

which requires pr<strong>of</strong>ound and consistent control and measurement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> brand<br />

personality. The brand personality increases <strong>the</strong> brand preference and usage, emerges<br />

emotions in consumers and increases trust and loyalty.<br />

Although more and more marketers and scientists are concerned with <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

brand personality, <strong>the</strong>re is still gap in <strong>the</strong> knowledge and fur<strong>the</strong>r research needs to be<br />

done. Quite few is known about <strong>the</strong> attitude formation under conditions <strong>of</strong> low<br />

motivation ability, or <strong>the</strong> psychological mechanisms by which brand personality works<br />

across cultures.<br />

20


List <strong>of</strong> Figures<br />

Figure 1: Stages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Base in <strong>Brand</strong> <strong>Personality</strong> Design 4<br />

Figure 2:McKinsey <strong>Brand</strong> <strong>Personality</strong> Gameboard Map 15<br />

Figure 3: Thailand Pantene Ad 25<br />

Figure 4: Pantene Ad Violistin 26<br />

- 21 -


List <strong>of</strong> Tables<br />

Table 1: Elements <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Personality</strong> 3<br />

Table 2: "Big Five" Dimensions and <strong>the</strong>ir Facets 6<br />

Table 3:The Hero and <strong>the</strong> Outlaw, Building Extraordinary <strong>Brand</strong>s through <strong>the</strong> <strong>Power</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Archetypes</strong> from Centre for Archetypal Studies and Applications 11<br />

Table 4 Categorization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archetypes</strong> according to <strong>the</strong> Company's Motivation 12<br />

Table 5 Hierarchical Value Map for Shampoo Category 18<br />

22


Bibliography<br />

Aaker, A.D., and A Biel. 1993. <strong>Brand</strong> Equity and Advertising, Advertising's Role in<br />

Building Strong <strong>Brand</strong>s. New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. .<br />

Aaker, J.D. 1997. Dimensions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brand</strong> <strong>Personality</strong>. Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing Research XXXIV<br />

(3):347-356.<br />

Batey, M. 2008. <strong>Brand</strong> Meaning. London: Psychology Pess.<br />

Blanchart, Robert T. 2010. Creating <strong>Brand</strong> Value Through Customer Intimacy. Impact,<br />

14-15.<br />

Chernatony, Leslie de. 2006. From <strong>the</strong> <strong>Brand</strong> Vision to <strong>Brand</strong> Evaluation. 2nd ed. NY:<br />

Butterworth-Heinemann.<br />

Cretu, Anca E., and Roderick J. Brodie. 2007. The influence <strong>of</strong> brand image and company<br />

reputation where manufacturers market to small firms: A customer value perspective.<br />

Industrial Marketing Management (36):230-240.<br />

Damasio, Antonio R. 1994. Descartes Error: Reason and The Human Brain. New York:<br />

Putnam Berkley Group Inc.<br />

Heding, Tilde, Charlotte F. Knudtzen, and Mogens Bjerre. 2008. <strong>Brand</strong> Management:<br />

REsearch Theory and Practice. Routledge.<br />

Jansen, M. 2006. <strong>Brand</strong> Prototyping: Creating Meaningful <strong>Brand</strong>s. Amsterdam: Kluwer.<br />

Jung, Carl Gustav. 1963. Mysterium Coniunctionis Edited by B. S. XX. Vol. 14, Collected<br />

Works <strong>of</strong> C.G. Jung Vol.14. Princeton: Princeton University Press.<br />

Pantene. Pantene Corporate Web Page, 2010 updated 2010. Available from<br />

http://www.pantene.com/en-US/Pages/index.aspx.<br />

Pearson, Carol S., and Margaret Mark. 2001. The Hero and <strong>the</strong> Outlaw, Bulding<br />

Extraordinary <strong>Brand</strong>s through <strong>the</strong> <strong>Power</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archetypes</strong><br />

New York: McGraw-Hill.<br />

Riesenbeck, Hajo, and Jesko Perrey. 2007. <strong>Power</strong> <strong>Brand</strong>s: Measuring, Making and<br />

Managing <strong>Brand</strong> Success. Weinheim: Wiley VCH Verlag GmbH&Co KGaA.<br />

Schoormans, Jan P.L. 2009. A Visual Tool for <strong>Brand</strong> <strong>Personality</strong> Develpoment.<br />

http://www.uigarden.net/english/a-visual-tool-for-brand-personality-development.<br />

Temporal, Paul. 2010. Advanced <strong>Brand</strong> Management: Managing <strong>Brand</strong>s in a Changing<br />

World. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte. Ltd.<br />

23


Wolfe, David. 2003. <strong>Brand</strong> <strong>Personality</strong>: Sensitive management <strong>of</strong> a brand‟s archetypal<br />

image is critical to <strong>the</strong> well being <strong>of</strong> a brand and key to reversing <strong>the</strong> tide <strong>of</strong> ebbing brand<br />

loyalty.<br />

24


Appendix<br />

Typical Pantene ad, promoting<br />

<strong>the</strong> magician archetype through<br />

<strong>the</strong> visionary transformation.<br />

The shampoo is endorsed by<br />

Thailand celebrities. Magician<br />

brands are also highly<br />

innovative, and are <strong>of</strong>ten related<br />

to a very new, contemporary<br />

product. As you can see, <strong>the</strong><br />

visual <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong><br />

contemporary new ingredients<br />

and formulas included in <strong>the</strong> ad.<br />

Tagline: transform your hair in<br />

fourteen days.<br />

Figure 3: Thailand Pantene Ad<br />

25


Ano<strong>the</strong>r example which promotes <strong>the</strong><br />

brands core values. In this case, however,<br />

indirectly: It is a story about a young deaf<br />

violinist with a dream. She wants to<br />

succeed on a music contest, but nobody<br />

believes in her. The ad ends up with<br />

happy end and gives <strong>the</strong> consumer an<br />

insight from a creative angle about <strong>the</strong><br />

shampoo.<br />

The tagline: „You can shine.“<br />

Figure 4: Pantene Ad Violinist<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!