GRAPHIS SCNIPTA - Universitetet i Oslo
GRAPHIS SCNIPTA - Universitetet i Oslo
GRAPHIS SCNIPTA - Universitetet i Oslo
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
118 Gunnar Degelius<br />
GRAPHTS SCRTPTA 5 (19e3)<br />
Figure 1. Sten Ahlner on excursion, 1925.<br />
selrot and I were working on investigations<br />
similar to those of Sten. As pointed out by<br />
Sten in his dissertation, we three had a mutual<br />
interchange brought together at the institution<br />
almost every day during several years (except<br />
the summer) and during numerous excursions<br />
in my car in Uppland and other areas (Sten<br />
and I also in Tr6ndelagen in Nonvay in 1934).<br />
Sten's lichenological interest was strongly<br />
stimulated. He was especially interested in the<br />
macrolichens, and among crustose ones, the<br />
Caliciales. His first lichenological papers deal<br />
with two fruticose (pendulous) species, Evernia<br />
divaicata and Usnea longissima, the lastmentioned<br />
in a comprehensive survey of the<br />
Nordic distribution, a very good maiden work.<br />
Altogether, he wrote L9 papers on Nordic<br />
lichens before his greatest work, the doctoral<br />
Nation (1986), in the survey of the work at<br />
"Vdntbio". Only slight information in a fqotnote<br />
(p. La\ is to be found there. (The statement<br />
that Degelius and Ahlner were called the<br />
lichen clergymen ("lavprostarna") is a misunderstanding;<br />
Torsten Hasselrot was sometimes<br />
called "lavprosten" owing to his habitus.)<br />
dissertation (1948). Among these smaller publications<br />
is an inventory of the whole lichen<br />
flora of an area in J6mtland (L944).<br />
The subject of his dissertation was settled<br />
already in 1933, and deals with some selected<br />
lichens on coniferous trees in Norden, their<br />
distribution and ecology, €t cetera (1948),<br />
established in the same way as my own dissertation<br />
on the oceanic lichens (1935). Nineteen<br />
macrolichens are described in detail. It is no<br />
homogeneous group as to distribution et cetera;<br />
some species are markedly eastern in<br />
Scandinavia, others western or widely spread.<br />
Some species are rare, others rather common.<br />
His statements on distribution are based on<br />
maps according to the current dot-method,<br />
and these maps had been established, for the<br />
most part, on the basis of investigations during<br />
Sten's own numerous journeys (by bicycle or,<br />
later on, moped) in Sweden, Nonvay and Finland.<br />
Detailed lists of localities are included,<br />
also photos of nearly all species. Especially<br />
interesting are Cavernularia hultenii, Efuderma<br />
boreale (described as a new species),<br />
and Lobaria hallii (cf. below). Finally, he also<br />
had an interesting and critical discussion on