02.01.2014 Views

View PDF of this issue - The Green Sheet

View PDF of this issue - The Green Sheet

View PDF of this issue - The Green Sheet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42<br />

News<br />

Heartland settles<br />

some, loses one<br />

On Dec. 21, 2009, Heartland Payment Systems<br />

Inc. agreed to settle the consumer cardholder<br />

class-action lawsuits that emanated from the<br />

District Court for the Southern District <strong>of</strong><br />

Texas. <strong>The</strong> suits involve claims arising from the data<br />

breach <strong>of</strong> the Princeton, N.J.-based processor's payment<br />

system reported by Heartland in January 2009.<br />

In accordance with settlement terms, Heartland will pay<br />

between $1 million and $2.4 million to class-action participants<br />

who submit valid claims for losses as a result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

breach. According to the court, <strong>this</strong> settlement resolves all<br />

actions and proceedings that were asserted, or could have<br />

been asserted, against Heartland in relation to the breach.<br />

No transparency disparity<br />

Heartland will also pay all costs associated with the<br />

administration <strong>of</strong> the class-action settlement, including<br />

up to $1.5 million to notify affected cardholders <strong>of</strong> procedures<br />

to be followed for making claims or opting out <strong>of</strong><br />

the settlement. A Web site dedicated to disseminating <strong>this</strong><br />

information is included in Heartland's obligations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> company has also agreed to pay up to $760,000 <strong>of</strong><br />

the attorneys' fees and costs <strong>of</strong> attorneys representing<br />

cardholders victimized by the breach. Lastly, Heartland<br />

will submit the report <strong>of</strong> an independent expert on the<br />

processor's actions and its plans to enhance the security<br />

<strong>of</strong> its payment system.<br />

"We are pleased to have reached a fair and reasonable<br />

settlement agreement that helps cardholders recover<br />

losses they may have incurred directly related to the<br />

criminal intrusion," said Heartland's Chairman and Chief<br />

Executive Officer Robert O. Carr. "We are committed<br />

to providing our merchants and their customers with a<br />

secure processing solution that protects them from the<br />

growing threat <strong>of</strong> cybercrime."<br />

A December to remember<br />

<strong>The</strong> resolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> class-action suit follows on the heels<br />

<strong>of</strong> two other cases settled regarding the Heartland compromise.<br />

On Dec. 7, 2009, the United States District Court<br />

for the District <strong>of</strong> New Jersey granted Heartland's motion<br />

to dismiss a consolidated shareholder class-action lawsuit<br />

filed against Heartland.<br />

Additionally, ten days later Heartland agreed to pay<br />

American Express Co. $3.6 million, which completed all<br />

"intrusion-related <strong>issue</strong>s" between the two companies.<br />

Carr commented that the settlement with AmEx marked<br />

the first agreement with a card brand related to the breach.<br />

VeriFone prevails<br />

Concluding a tumultuous 2009, VeriFone reported that<br />

Heartland's action to block VeriFone from providing<br />

direct support to Heartland merchant customers was<br />

rejected by a federal court.<br />

After VeriFone filed a lawsuit in September 2009 alleging<br />

Heartland had infringed on a VeriFone patent gained<br />

through the acquisition <strong>of</strong> Lipman Electronic Engineering<br />

Ltd., VeriFone said it would provide support to Heartland<br />

merchants to prevent disruptions and maintain optimal<br />

service levels. One week later, Heartland requested an<br />

injunction to prevent VeriFone from doing just that.<br />

However, on Dec. 28, in the U.S. District Court for the<br />

District <strong>of</strong> New Jersey, Judge Mary L. Cooper denied<br />

Heartland's injunction request on the grounds that the<br />

processor's contentions "contradict its own claims in<br />

<strong>this</strong> case" regarding its ability to service clients who use<br />

VeriFone systems.<br />

<strong>The</strong> judge said Heartland's assertions in previous court<br />

filings "suggests an ongoing dependence and foreseeable<br />

adverse consequences upon withdrawal <strong>of</strong> such support."<br />

Cooper also rejected Heartland's assertion that VeriFone<br />

made untrue statements.<br />

"We are pleased that Judge Cooper saw fit not to block

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!