View PDF of this issue - The Green Sheet
View PDF of this issue - The Green Sheet
View PDF of this issue - The Green Sheet
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
42<br />
News<br />
Heartland settles<br />
some, loses one<br />
On Dec. 21, 2009, Heartland Payment Systems<br />
Inc. agreed to settle the consumer cardholder<br />
class-action lawsuits that emanated from the<br />
District Court for the Southern District <strong>of</strong><br />
Texas. <strong>The</strong> suits involve claims arising from the data<br />
breach <strong>of</strong> the Princeton, N.J.-based processor's payment<br />
system reported by Heartland in January 2009.<br />
In accordance with settlement terms, Heartland will pay<br />
between $1 million and $2.4 million to class-action participants<br />
who submit valid claims for losses as a result <strong>of</strong> the<br />
breach. According to the court, <strong>this</strong> settlement resolves all<br />
actions and proceedings that were asserted, or could have<br />
been asserted, against Heartland in relation to the breach.<br />
No transparency disparity<br />
Heartland will also pay all costs associated with the<br />
administration <strong>of</strong> the class-action settlement, including<br />
up to $1.5 million to notify affected cardholders <strong>of</strong> procedures<br />
to be followed for making claims or opting out <strong>of</strong><br />
the settlement. A Web site dedicated to disseminating <strong>this</strong><br />
information is included in Heartland's obligations.<br />
<strong>The</strong> company has also agreed to pay up to $760,000 <strong>of</strong><br />
the attorneys' fees and costs <strong>of</strong> attorneys representing<br />
cardholders victimized by the breach. Lastly, Heartland<br />
will submit the report <strong>of</strong> an independent expert on the<br />
processor's actions and its plans to enhance the security<br />
<strong>of</strong> its payment system.<br />
"We are pleased to have reached a fair and reasonable<br />
settlement agreement that helps cardholders recover<br />
losses they may have incurred directly related to the<br />
criminal intrusion," said Heartland's Chairman and Chief<br />
Executive Officer Robert O. Carr. "We are committed<br />
to providing our merchants and their customers with a<br />
secure processing solution that protects them from the<br />
growing threat <strong>of</strong> cybercrime."<br />
A December to remember<br />
<strong>The</strong> resolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> class-action suit follows on the heels<br />
<strong>of</strong> two other cases settled regarding the Heartland compromise.<br />
On Dec. 7, 2009, the United States District Court<br />
for the District <strong>of</strong> New Jersey granted Heartland's motion<br />
to dismiss a consolidated shareholder class-action lawsuit<br />
filed against Heartland.<br />
Additionally, ten days later Heartland agreed to pay<br />
American Express Co. $3.6 million, which completed all<br />
"intrusion-related <strong>issue</strong>s" between the two companies.<br />
Carr commented that the settlement with AmEx marked<br />
the first agreement with a card brand related to the breach.<br />
VeriFone prevails<br />
Concluding a tumultuous 2009, VeriFone reported that<br />
Heartland's action to block VeriFone from providing<br />
direct support to Heartland merchant customers was<br />
rejected by a federal court.<br />
After VeriFone filed a lawsuit in September 2009 alleging<br />
Heartland had infringed on a VeriFone patent gained<br />
through the acquisition <strong>of</strong> Lipman Electronic Engineering<br />
Ltd., VeriFone said it would provide support to Heartland<br />
merchants to prevent disruptions and maintain optimal<br />
service levels. One week later, Heartland requested an<br />
injunction to prevent VeriFone from doing just that.<br />
However, on Dec. 28, in the U.S. District Court for the<br />
District <strong>of</strong> New Jersey, Judge Mary L. Cooper denied<br />
Heartland's injunction request on the grounds that the<br />
processor's contentions "contradict its own claims in<br />
<strong>this</strong> case" regarding its ability to service clients who use<br />
VeriFone systems.<br />
<strong>The</strong> judge said Heartland's assertions in previous court<br />
filings "suggests an ongoing dependence and foreseeable<br />
adverse consequences upon withdrawal <strong>of</strong> such support."<br />
Cooper also rejected Heartland's assertion that VeriFone<br />
made untrue statements.<br />
"We are pleased that Judge Cooper saw fit not to block