03.01.2014 Views

Pacific Islands Environment Outlook - UNEP

Pacific Islands Environment Outlook - UNEP

Pacific Islands Environment Outlook - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28<br />

POLICY RESPONSES<br />

Coordinating Committee (SPOCC) to develop a<br />

Regional Development Strategy and sustainable<br />

development framework that incorporates the key<br />

linkages between the various development sectors.<br />

Sustainable management of these sectors, including<br />

agriculture, health and marine resources, is being<br />

actively promoted through the SPOCC working groups.<br />

In 1996 the South <strong>Pacific</strong> Forum adopted an<br />

Economic Action Plan to stimulate investment and job<br />

creation. Economic and public sector reform measures<br />

being adopted include: implementing trade and<br />

investment policies that encourage the diversification<br />

of export markets and sources of investment;<br />

reviewing exchange rate management; improving<br />

management of capital assets; improving the business<br />

climate; achieving free and open trade and investment;<br />

addressing multilateral trade issues; and promoting<br />

sustainable tourism development.<br />

Economic reform in the region comes at a time<br />

when countries are also concerned about their<br />

vulnerability to a wide range of economic and<br />

environmental factors, such as climate change. They<br />

are also concerned about the impacts of development<br />

on community cohesion and the natural resources<br />

upon which both cash and subsistence economies<br />

depend. The Forum Leaders and Economic Ministers<br />

are therefore fully aware of the need to implement<br />

economic policies that fully respect the differing<br />

natural resources and environmental endowments of<br />

the region, and that take into account the social and<br />

cultural impacts. <strong>Pacific</strong> leaders have recognized the<br />

important links between environment and development<br />

and have stated clearly that development must be both<br />

economically and ecologically sound (Forum<br />

Secretariat 1993). This was endorsed by <strong>Environment</strong><br />

Ministers in 1996 and is now being implemented at<br />

the national level and at the regional level through the<br />

Forum process. As an example, the Forum Economic<br />

Ministers in July 1999 agreed to adopt an integrated<br />

policy framework for promoting the sustainable<br />

development of tourism.<br />

It is only relatively recently that policies have<br />

taken account of the environmental dimensions of<br />

development and specific resource exploitation. The<br />

extent to which this has had an impact is difficult to<br />

determine. At recent meetings of the Apia and SPREP<br />

Conventions, in October 1995, it was apparent that<br />

governments were finding reporting requirements a<br />

strain on limited human and financial resources.<br />

MEAs and non-binding instruments<br />

This section reviews some of the multilateral<br />

environmental agreements (MEAs) that have been<br />

implemented in the <strong>Pacific</strong> islands region. The global,<br />

regional and soft law agreements under review are<br />

discussed separately, focusing on the implementation,<br />

impact, compliance and effectiveness levels of the<br />

MEAs, taking into account the linkages between the<br />

three areas. The overall barriers to the implementation<br />

of MEAs in the region are identified, and items for<br />

policy action reviewed.<br />

Global MEAs<br />

IMPLEMENTATION AND COMPLIANCE<br />

Table 2.1 sets out a list of some of the major global<br />

environmental MEAs in existence in the <strong>Pacific</strong> region<br />

and the PICs that have implemented MEAs by either<br />

signing, acceding to and/or ratifying those instruments.<br />

The status with respect to the implementation of the<br />

conventions by territories of metropolitan powers<br />

depends on the treaty-making arrangement the territory<br />

has with the respective power in relation to an MEA.<br />

Exactly which conventions have been implemented in the<br />

territories as a result of the implementation of a<br />

convention by a metropolitan power is not easy to<br />

determine and is an item for policy action below.<br />

Multilateral <strong>Environment</strong>al Agreements (MEAs),<br />

provide the main link with global policy, and there is a<br />

growing awareness of the need to participate<br />

effectively in the development of such global<br />

agreements. This trend started with the active<br />

involvement of the <strong>Pacific</strong> island states in the UN<br />

Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the<br />

agreement on Conservation and Management of<br />

Straddling Fish Stocks (CMS) and the UN Framework<br />

Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)<br />

negotiations. In recent times it has continued with the<br />

region’s interest in the Convention on Biological<br />

Diversity (CBD) – particularly Article 15 on access to<br />

genetic resources – and the Convention on Combating<br />

Desertification (CCD) .<br />

United Nations Framework on Climate Change<br />

The UNFCCC has been ratified by 12 PICs, and both<br />

PICs and Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS)<br />

countries have played a pivotal role in the climate<br />

change negotiations. PIC influence has ensured that<br />

their special and vulnerable status is recognized in<br />

Chapter 17 of Agenda 21, as echoed in the preambular

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!