Pacific Islands Environment Outlook - UNEP
Pacific Islands Environment Outlook - UNEP
Pacific Islands Environment Outlook - UNEP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SOCIAL POLICIES 47<br />
quota (165 348 tonnes per year) under the Sugar Protocol annexed to<br />
the Lomé Conventions. This quota covers about 45 percent of the<br />
country's sugar exports and provides benefits of €40–50 million per<br />
year. The gross income from Fiji's sugar exports to the EU in 1998<br />
amounted to almost €92 000.<br />
In November 1998, the European Commission released studies on<br />
the impact on ACP countries of its proposed Regional Economic<br />
Partnership Agreements (REPAs). General conclusions of the studies<br />
were: 1) In most cases, LDCs have little to gain from REPAs in terms of<br />
market access to the EU. (Total funds provided by the EC to island<br />
developing states for the period 1976–1995 were €4 447 million. For the<br />
period 1996–2000 (Lomé IV bis) the package foreseen for the National<br />
and Regional Programmes amounted to €1 024 million. They can keep<br />
non-reciprocal trade preferences in any case. 2) The loss of nonreciprocal<br />
preferences would hardly affect the export performance of<br />
many ACP countries. 3) By contrast, the direct or indirect effects of not<br />
renewing the protocols could dramatically affect the exports of some ACP<br />
countries. However, the studies did not estimate these effects as this<br />
would have required separate studies. 4) The negative impact on<br />
customs revenues varies considerably, but could be substantial for some.<br />
The main conclusions summarised for the <strong>Pacific</strong> region were: The<br />
eight <strong>Pacific</strong> ACP countries have not been organized as a regional<br />
group, but belong to the South <strong>Pacific</strong> Forum along with eight other<br />
countries. The report suggests that a Free Trade Area (FTA) could be<br />
negotiated with the Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG), a sub-group<br />
comprising Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Solomon <strong>Islands</strong> and Vanuatu. A<br />
more general Partnership Agreement could cover all eight <strong>Pacific</strong> ACP<br />
countries. The lack of institutional capacity of the MSG would need to be<br />
addressed. Besides, the interests of the other members of the South<br />
<strong>Pacific</strong> Forum would need to be considered, notably Australia and New<br />
Zealand. The latter in particular would probably require the same<br />
access to the ACP <strong>Pacific</strong> countries as granted to the EU. A step towards<br />
the above direction was taken on 1 June 1999 when Trade Ministers of<br />
the South <strong>Pacific</strong> Forum endorsed in principle a Free Trade Area between<br />
the Forum Island Countries in the region.<br />
The termination of the sugar protocol and the preferences for<br />
canned tuna would have large implications for Fiji in terms of<br />
employment, export earnings and thus the government's budget. Even if<br />
the protocols remained, both sectors would need to adjust, probably<br />
with some support from donors. For the seven other <strong>Pacific</strong> ACP<br />
countries, the termination of Lomé preferences would have no<br />
significant effect. Effects on imports are also likely to be small.<br />
References:<br />
De Groot, Albert and van Nes, René, 1998. Introducing reciprocity into the trade<br />
relations between EU and the <strong>Pacific</strong> countries. Netherlands Economic Institute,<br />
September 1998, Rotterdam.<br />
ECSIEP/PCRC, 1998. Reflection of the Programme of Action for the Sustainable<br />
Development of Small Island Developing States in the National Indicative<br />
Programmes and the Regional Indicative Programme of the <strong>Pacific</strong> ACP. June<br />
1998. On the internet: http://www.antenna.n./ecsiep/lome/sidspoa.html.<br />
European Commision, 1997. Annual Report (as required by Article 318 of the<br />
Fourth Lomé Convention) on Co-Operation between the European Union and the<br />
South <strong>Pacific</strong> Region 1997. Brussels, 1998.<br />
European Commission, 1997. Annual Report (as required by Article 318 of the<br />
Fourth Lomé Convention) on Co-Operation between the European Union and the<br />
Republic of Fiji 1997. Brussels, 1998.<br />
European Commission, 1997. Annual Report (as required by Article 318 of the<br />
Fourth Lomé Convention) on Co-Operation between the European Union and the<br />
Republic of Kiribati 1997. Brussels, 1998.<br />
European Commission, 1997. Annual Report (as required by Article 318 of the<br />
Fourth Lomé Convention) on Co-Operation between the European Union and Papua<br />
New Guinea 1997. Brussels, 1998.<br />
European Commission, 1997. Annual Report (as required by Article 318 of the<br />
Fourth Lomé Convention) on Co-Operation between the European Union and Samoa<br />
1997. Brussels, 1998.<br />
European Commission, 1997. Annual Report (as required by Article 318 of the<br />
Fourth Lomé Convention) on Co-Operation between the European Union and the<br />
Kingdom of Tonga 1997. Brussels, 1998.<br />
European Commission, 1997. Annual Report (as required by Article 318 of the<br />
Fourth Lomé Convention) on Co-Operation between the European Union and Tuvalu<br />
1997. Brussels, 1998.<br />
European Commission, 1997, Annual Report (as required by Article 318 of the<br />
Fourth Lomé Convention) on Co-Operation between the European Union and the<br />
Republic of Vanuatu 1997. Brussels, 1998.<br />
Tuononen, Heli (compiled by), 1999. The European Union's Co-operation with Small<br />
Island Developing States in the Framework of the Barbados Programme of Action.<br />
European Commission, Brussels, April 1999.<br />
United Nations, 1994. Report of the Global Conference on the Sustainable<br />
Development of Small Island Developing States, Bridgetown, Barbados, 26 April-6<br />
May 1994. United Nations, New York, 1994.