03.01.2014 Views

teacher

teacher

teacher

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Celebrating the World Teacher’s s Day<br />

Groept T University<br />

Leuven, , Belgium, 3 October 2008<br />

Developing Teacher Professional<br />

Standards in Building Four Pillars<br />

of Learning for Quality Education<br />

Zhou Nanzhao<br />

East-China Normal University<br />

UNESCO Asia Pacific Network for International Education and Values Education


OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

II.<br />

CHANGING LARNING<br />

ENVIRONMENTS AFFECTING<br />

TEACHERS<br />

III.<br />

PILLARS OF LEARNING<br />

IV.<br />

TEACHER PROFESSIONAL<br />

STANDARDS FOR TEACHER<br />

QUALITY<br />

V. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTON


I. INTRODUCTION<br />

‘Teachers are a key enabling factor in improving the<br />

quality of education’ (EFA GMR 2004). ‘The<br />

importance of the quality of teaching, and therefore<br />

of <strong>teacher</strong>s, cannot be over emphasized…. . Teachers<br />

are instrumental in in the development of attitudes to<br />

learning’ (Delors<br />

et al)<br />

Teacher education in crisis in large part of the world:<br />

human, finnancial and professional<br />

The best way to celebrate World Teachers’ Day: to<br />

turn policy rhetoric into actions, prgrammmes and<br />

investment for improved <strong>teacher</strong>s’ quality and socio-<br />

economic status: Message for the EFA High-Level<br />

Group Meeting, Oslo


II. CHANGING LEARNING<br />

Shift from f<br />

ENVIRONMENTS<br />

rom ‘schooling’ to life-long long learning:<br />

impossibility to teach everything supposed to be useful<br />

for the student’s s life<br />

Shift of emphasis from ‘teaching’ to ‘learning’:<br />

Teachers losing leading place and monopoly on<br />

information/knowledge <strong>teacher</strong> to develop competency<br />

for learner-centered education<br />

Shift of increasing policy attention to quality<br />

implying for upgraded <strong>teacher</strong> qualifications and<br />

more rigorous certification Changing


Multiplying functions of <strong>teacher</strong>s and wider range of skills<br />

and human qualities required of <strong>teacher</strong>s<br />

Change of focus from <strong>teacher</strong> training to <strong>teacher</strong><br />

professional learning<br />

Change of <strong>teacher</strong> development model changing from<br />

university-based training to school-based <strong>teacher</strong><br />

development and university-school school partnership<br />

The unfinished task of making teaching a profession:<br />

UNESCO-ILO Recommendation (1966): “Teaching should<br />

be regarded as a profession”.


the impending shortage of qualified <strong>teacher</strong>s (1.6<br />

million needed in Sub-Sahara Sahara Africa alone to<br />

achieve UPE by 2015)<br />

the lack of attraction of the teaching profession in<br />

recruiting motivated and qualified <strong>teacher</strong><br />

candidates and high turnover rate of in-service<br />

<strong>teacher</strong>s<br />

the irrelevant outdated curriculum of <strong>teacher</strong><br />

education<br />

the needed improvement of <strong>teacher</strong>’s s education<br />

attainment level and <strong>teacher</strong> professional<br />

competencies through professional development


Changing Learning Environments Affecting Teaching<br />

New Aims of Teaching<br />

From an instrumental view of education (training for skills as<br />

instrument for productivity) to an encompassing humanistic<br />

view of learning for the development of a ‘complete person’ in<br />

all the richness of the personality<br />

From developing part of intellectual faculty to fully tap the<br />

talents and potentials ‘hidden like buried treasure in every<br />

person’ (occupational skills becoming secondary and human<br />

qualities for inter-personal relationships becoming essential)<br />

Teaching for creativity and adaptability to change in an<br />

uncertain future<br />

Teaching for continued learning throughout life in a learning<br />

society<br />

Teaching for living together in peace and harmony (‘wa’) in an<br />

increasingly globalized world


New Content of Learning<br />

from <strong>teacher</strong>-centered to learner-centered curriculum<br />

from subject knowledge towards intellectual abilities<br />

from disciplinary-based curriculum to integrated, interdisciplinary<br />

teaching<br />

from supply-driven to demand-driven learning content<br />

from individual learning towards cooperative learning<br />

from reclassification/mastery of old knowledge to acquisition<br />

of instruments of knowing and understanding<br />

a new balance of scientific-technological and social-humanisticcultural<br />

content of education<br />

a new balance of general vs. vocational components of<br />

education and general vs. specialized training<br />

a new balance of knowledge and skills/competencies and<br />

values/attitudes


New Process of Learning<br />

• from linear model of education to cyclical paradigm of<br />

study-work alternation and lifelong pursuit of learning<br />

• from<br />

‘one-stop’ knowledge/degree acquisition at<br />

schools/universities to more diversified gateways to<br />

learning opportunities in ‘mega-malls malls of information<br />

and short-term term in-service training<br />

• from rote learning, ‘classroom discipline' and man-<br />

machine interaction to more <strong>teacher</strong>-pupil, pupil-pupil<br />

interaction/dialogue and collaborative team learning.


New Types of Learners<br />

new learners in ‘generation gaps’, with different values,<br />

‘languages’, and ‘pop-cultures’, and in different ways of thinking,<br />

reacting, responding and getting motivated<br />

new generation of learners ‘growing digital on the net’, with skills<br />

and competencies oftentimes better than their <strong>teacher</strong>s in using ICT as<br />

powerful learning tools<br />

new generation of learners of more diverse backgrounds and<br />

‘cultural identities’ (age, ethnicity, linguistic, economic, religions,<br />

working experience, etc.)<br />

new learners with new traits of independence, creativity, openmindedness,<br />

and enterprising minds


New Spaces/Dimensions of Learning<br />

horizontally: from schools to work-places,<br />

communities, mass media, and other social learning<br />

environment<br />

longitudinally: from early childhood through<br />

adulthood to post-retirement years (lifelong)<br />

vertically: from real to digital and virtual<br />

learning environments


Changing Teacher Roles Demanding New Standards<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

the sole source of<br />

information<br />

an authority of knowledge<br />

a transmitter of factual<br />

knowledge<br />

a craftsman in lecturing/a<br />

‘chalk-talk’ instructor<br />

teaching as an occupation<br />

a solitary worker/a ‘soloist’<br />

in teaching<br />

an ever ‘<strong>teacher</strong>’<br />

a receptive/conservative<br />

force of inertia resistant to<br />

change<br />

one of multiple sources of<br />

information<br />

a friend and a guide in<br />

exploring the unknown; A co-<br />

learner<br />

a facilitator of knowledge,<br />

skills and moral values<br />

an artist and scientist in<br />

teaching/a specialist of<br />

teaching with technologies<br />

teaching as a profession<br />

a team member/<br />

‘accompanist- and<br />

communicator<br />

a life-long long learner; A<br />

facilitator of learning<br />

An active agent of change


III. THE PILLARS OF LEARING<br />

“If it is to succeed in its tasks, education must be<br />

organized around four fundamental types of<br />

learning which, throughout a person’s s life, will<br />

in a way be the pillars of knowledge …..<br />

these four paths of knowledge all form a whole,<br />

because there are many points of contact,<br />

intersection and exchange among them”.<br />

-- from Delors et al, Learning: The<br />

Treasure Within, , UNESCO Publishing, 1996


Learning To Know<br />

to master instruments of knowing<br />

to learn to learn and to discover<br />

to develop faculty of memory, imagination, reasoning, and<br />

problem-solving<br />

to understand about his/her environment<br />

to think in a coherent and critical way<br />

to communicate with others<br />

to acquire a knowledge of the scientific method and<br />

instruments<br />

to develop a scientific spirit and an inquiring mind<br />

to acquire independence of judgement


Learning To Do<br />

To apply in practice what has been learned<br />

To develop vocational/occupational and technical skills<br />

To develop social skills in building meaningful inter-<br />

personal relations<br />

To transform knowledge into innovations and job-creation<br />

To develop competence, a mix of higher skills, of social<br />

behaviour, of an aptitude for team work, and<br />

initiative/readiness to take risks<br />

To develop personal commitment to work<br />

To enhance ability to communicate, to work with others<br />

To o manage and resolve conflicts


Learning To Be<br />

cultivating qualities of imagination and<br />

creativity,<br />

developing diversified talents and dimensions<br />

of personalities – aesthetic, artistic, literary,<br />

sporting, scientific, cultural and social<br />

developing critical thinking and exercising<br />

independent judgment<br />

developing personal commitment and<br />

responsibility for public good<br />

tapping fully the talents hidden in each<br />

individual


Learning To Live Together<br />

To discover others<br />

To appreciate the diversity of the human race<br />

To know oneself<br />

To be receptive to others and to encounter others<br />

through dialogue and debate<br />

To care and share<br />

To work toward common objectives in cooperative<br />

undertakings<br />

To manage and resolve conflicts in peaceful ways


The Use of the Four Pillars of Learniing in Curriculum Change (Mongolia)<br />

Content domain<br />

Technology<br />

Social science<br />

Natural science<br />

Mathematics<br />

Humanistic science<br />

Competence<br />

To know<br />

To be<br />

To do<br />

To live socially together


III. TEACHER STANDARDS NEEDED<br />

What Are Standards<br />

Standards make judgment about the ‘desirable<br />

level of performance’<br />

Standards clarify what <strong>teacher</strong>s should know<br />

and be able to do in the light of research and<br />

best practice<br />

Standards clarify what <strong>teacher</strong>s to get better at<br />

over the longer term<br />

Standards describe trajectories for professional<br />

development


Standards are centered on core propositions that<br />

broadly reflect a rich and complex knowledge<br />

base<br />

Standards are statements about what are valued-<br />

statements of principle<br />

Standards provide adequate guidance for making<br />

judgments of the degree of <strong>teacher</strong>s’ experience<br />

and the desirable level of performance in<br />

teaching


Why Standards Are Important<br />

As the ‘core business’ for the profession and its<br />

members<br />

As foundation to reshape initial training<br />

curriculum around for entry into the teaching<br />

As criteria for assessment of <strong>teacher</strong><br />

competencies<br />

As tools for professional learning and growth<br />

on a continuum<br />

As instrument to generate improvements in the<br />

quality of learning-teaching process


Two different set of purposes:<br />

• Standards for a<br />

Standards for accreditation,<br />

registration, advanced<br />

certification and promotion; or<br />

• Standards for a continuum of<br />

<strong>teacher</strong> professional learning


What Types of Standards<br />

Beginning vs Advanced standards<br />

(focusing on high-order competencies<br />

demonstrated by more accomplished <strong>teacher</strong>s)<br />

Generic vs Subject-specific standards<br />

(applying to professional knowledge, skills and<br />

values for teaching an individual subject)


How Standards Could Be Structured<br />

What is expected of <strong>teacher</strong>s? (requirement);<br />

What evidence would a <strong>teacher</strong> have to<br />

demonstrate to indicate that this was present?<br />

(performance indicator);<br />

How well did the <strong>teacher</strong> demonstrate<br />

this? (quality criterion);<br />

How do the quality criteria different<br />

between <strong>teacher</strong>s?


Diagram: Performance-based teaching standards: main components<br />

Core professional principles/values guiding educational vision<br />

Content standards<br />

What is good teaching?<br />

What should <strong>teacher</strong>s<br />

know and be able to do?<br />

Defining the domain of<br />

good teaching.<br />

What is the scope of<br />

<strong>teacher</strong>s’ work?<br />

What are we going to<br />

measure?<br />

Evidential standards<br />

What evidence will we<br />

gather?<br />

What rules will we use to<br />

gather evidence of<br />

practices?<br />

Capturing good teaching.<br />

What tasks should<br />

<strong>teacher</strong>s be expected to<br />

perform?<br />

How are we going to<br />

measure it?<br />

Performance standards<br />

How will we judge<br />

performance?<br />

What level of<br />

performance meets the<br />

purpose?<br />

How good is good<br />

enough?<br />

Where do we get the<br />

standards?<br />

How will we<br />

discriminate between good<br />

and poor?<br />

How are we going to<br />

score it?<br />

[Source: ACER, Policy Briefs, Issue 1, May 2002]


What Teachers Should Learn To Know:<br />

Professional Knowledge-Base<br />

General pedagogical knowledge<br />

Subject matter knowledge<br />

Pedagogical content-knowledge<br />

Knowledge of student context and the interest<br />

Clinical training<br />

External evaluation of learning<br />

Knowledge strategies, techniques and tool to create and<br />

sustain a learning environment<br />

Knowledge and attitude supporting political and social<br />

justice<br />

Knowledge on how to implement technology in<br />

curriculum


the content they teach;<br />

how students learn that content<br />

how to represent and convey that content in<br />

meaningful ways;<br />

how well their students are doing in<br />

relation to how well they should be doing


What Teachers Should Learn To Do:<br />

Professional Skills<br />

Skills in planning lessons in light of learning goals<br />

Skills in class management<br />

Skills in involving learners in interaction<br />

Skills in seek feedback and improve teaching<br />

Skills in evaluating, monitoring and assessment<br />

Skills in enable pupils to learn to learn, with acquisition<br />

of learning tools and learning content<br />

Skills in organizing learning experiences in<br />

socialization of the pupils<br />

Skills in reflection on practices<br />

Skills in work with peers, parents and local community


What Teachers Should Learn To Be:<br />

Professional Ethical/Moral Values<br />

Commitment and dedication to learners<br />

and their learning: teaching as a public<br />

good<br />

Respect the rights of the child to<br />

education: equal access, equal treatment<br />

Love and care of the children<br />

<br />

Reflect on and improve one’s s own<br />

practices<br />

Learning to learn throughout life and<br />

making teaching a learning profession


What Teachers Should Learn To Live Together:<br />

Professional Attributes<br />

Breaking isolation from each other for peer<br />

learning<br />

Communicating and working with students as<br />

coaches of learning and co-learners<br />

Making the site of teaching the place for<br />

professional learning<br />

Transforming the culture of school as a learning<br />

community<br />

Working with the parents and local community<br />

Acting as agents of educational and social changes<br />

and as community members


V. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION<br />

• Developing broadened visions of teaching<br />

and <strong>teacher</strong> education in view of the changed<br />

learning environments<br />

• Joint studies and development of ‘a a global<br />

framework of <strong>teacher</strong> standards’ adaptable to<br />

country/locally-specific contexts, and their<br />

implementation in <strong>teacher</strong> certification and<br />

professional learning [e.g. the World Bank-<br />

China Ministry Study Project on ‘Teacher<br />

Education Quality Standards’]


Joint modules development on the four pillars<br />

of learning, based on UNESCO-APNIEVE<br />

Teachers Sourcebooks and Leuven Education<br />

College’s s Postgraduate International Educating<br />

Class (PIEC) initiative<br />

Participation in China-Africa <strong>teacher</strong> training<br />

programme supported by a Chinese donation:<br />

<strong>teacher</strong> education policy studies; math-science<br />

teaching standards development; use of<br />

distance/ICT <strong>teacher</strong> education; scholarships, etc.


Teacher professional development in the four<br />

pillars of learning, in partnership with UNESCO-<br />

ASPnet and APNIEVE<br />

Utilizing the International Education and<br />

Resource Network (iEARN(<br />

iEARN),<br />

non-profit org<br />

made of 22,000 schools in over 115 countries for<br />

online professional development and 1,000,000<br />

students daily engaged in collaborative project<br />

work


To update UNESCO-ILO Recommendations<br />

Concerning the Status of Teachers: : a possible<br />

international document binding national governments for<br />

increased investment in <strong>teacher</strong>s<br />

The need to revitalize UNESCO-ILO EFA Flagship<br />

programme on “Teachers and Quality of Education<br />

for All”, rallying support from member states and the<br />

international community<br />

An enhanced institutionalized Groept T presence in<br />

China/Asia for greater impacts of ‘Educating,<br />

Enterprising and Engineering’ in international education<br />

in general, and in <strong>teacher</strong> education in particular, in the<br />

better interest of learners in the knowledge economies of<br />

the 21 st century


http://www.icte.ecnu.edu.cn<br />

NZHOU@ADMIN.ECNU.EDU.CN<br />

ZHOUNZ@HOTMAIL.COM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!