07.01.2014 Views

PHYS08200605006 D.K. Hazra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS08200605006 D.K. Hazra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS08200605006 D.K. Hazra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.3. THE NUMERICAL COMPUTATION OF THE SCALAR BI-SPECTRUM<br />

zero contributions to the bi-spectrum can be easily calculated. The second example that<br />

we shall discuss is the Starobinsky model described by the potential (4.3) wherein, under<br />

certain conditions, the complete scalar bi-spectrum can be evaluated in the equilateral<br />

limit (see Ref. [54]; in this context, also see Refs. [55]).<br />

Let us first consider the case of power law inflation described by the scale factor (4.36)<br />

with γ ≤ −2. In such a case, as we have seen,ǫ 1 is a constant and, hence,ǫ 2 and ǫ ′ 2 , which<br />

involve derivatives of ǫ 1 , reduce to zero. Since the contributions due to the fourth and<br />

the seventh terms, viz. G 4 (k) and G 7 (k), depend on ǫ ′ 2 andǫ 2 , respectively [cf. Eqs. (4.11d)<br />

and (4.12)], these terms vanish identically in power law inflation. Note that the modesv k<br />

given by Eq. (4.37) depend only on the combination kη. Moreover, as ǫ 1 is a constant in<br />

power law inflation, we havef k ∝ v k /a . Under these conditions, with a simple rescaling<br />

of the variable of integration in the expressions (4.11a), (4.11b), (4.11c), (4.11e) and (4.11f),<br />

it is straightforward to show that, in the equilateral limit we are focusing on, the quantities<br />

G 1 , G 2 , G 3 , G 5 and G 6 , all depend on the wavenumber as k γ+1/2 . Then, upon making<br />

use of the asymptotic form of the modes f k , it is easy to illustrate that the corresponding<br />

contributions to the bi-spectrum, viz. G 1 + G 3 , G 2 and G 5 + G 6 , all behave as k 2(2γ+1) .<br />

Since the power spectrum in power law inflation is known to have the form k 2(γ+2) (see,<br />

for example, Refs. [105]), the expression (4.34) for f eq then immediately suggests that<br />

NL<br />

the quantity will be strictly scale invariant for all γ. In fact, apart from these results,<br />

it is also simple to establish the following relation between the different contributions:<br />

G 5 +G 6 = −(3ǫ 1 /16)(G 1 +G 3 ), a result, which, in fact, also holds in slow roll inflation [54].<br />

In other words, in power law inflation, it is possible to arrive at the spectral dependence<br />

of the non-zero contributions to the bi-spectrum without having to explicitly calculate<br />

the integrals involved. Further, one can establish that the non-Gaussianity parameterf eq<br />

NL<br />

is exactly scale independent for any value of γ. While these arguments does not help<br />

us in determining the amplitude of the various contributions to the bi-spectrum or the<br />

non-Gaussianity parameter, their spectral shape and the relative magnitude of the abovementioned<br />

terms provide crucial analytical results to crosscheck our numerical code. In<br />

Figure 4.4, we have plotted the different non-zero contributions to the bi-spectrum computed<br />

using our numerical code and the spectral dependence we have arrived at above<br />

analytically for two different values of γ in the case of power law inflation. We have also<br />

indicated the relative magnitude of the first and the third and the fifth and the sixth terms<br />

arrived at numerically. Lastly, we have also illustrated the scale independent behaviour<br />

of the non-Gaussianity parameter f eq for both the values of γ. It is clear from the figure<br />

NL<br />

that the numerical results agree well with the results and conclusions that we arrived at<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!