PHYS08200605006 D.K. Hazra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
PHYS08200605006 D.K. Hazra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
PHYS08200605006 D.K. Hazra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
List of Figures<br />
1.1 A schematic timeline of the universe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4<br />
1.2 Evolution of the physical wavelength and the Hubble radius during the<br />
inflationary and the radiation dominated epochs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />
1.3 The theoretical and the observed CMB (TT) angular power spectra . . . . . 17<br />
2.1 The difference inχ 2 eff with and without the step, plotted as a function of the<br />
multipoles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36<br />
2.2 Typical evolution of the first slow roll parameter ǫ 1 and the quantity η<br />
around a step in an inflationary potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37<br />
2.3 The scalar power spectra corresponding to the best fit values of the WMAP<br />
seven-year data for inflationary models with the step . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38<br />
2.4 The CMBTT angular power spectra corresponding to the best fit values of<br />
the inflationary models for the WMAP seven-year data without and with<br />
the step . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39<br />
3.1 The difference in χ 2 eff between the axion monodromy model and the reference<br />
model, plotted as a function of the multipoles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51<br />
3.2 The scalar power spectrum corresponding to the best fit values of inflationary<br />
potentials containing oscillatory terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52<br />
3.3 The CMB TT angular power spectrum in inflationary models containing<br />
oscillatory terms in the potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53<br />
4.1 The scalar power spectra in the different types of models that we consider . 62<br />
4.2 The behavior of the different contributions to the bi-spectrum, plotted as a<br />
function of cut off parameterκ, for the case of the quadratic potential . . . . 75<br />
4.3 The behavior of the different contributions to the bi-spectrum, plotted as<br />
a function of the upper limit of the integrals, for the case of the quadratic<br />
potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76<br />
xxiii