PHYS08200605006 D.K. Hazra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
PHYS08200605006 D.K. Hazra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
PHYS08200605006 D.K. Hazra - Homi Bhabha National Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.3. THE NUMERICAL COMPUTATION OF THE SCALAR BI-SPECTRUM<br />
grals<br />
G 1 (k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 ) = 2i<br />
∫ ηe<br />
η i<br />
dηa 2 ǫ 2 1<br />
(<br />
f<br />
∗<br />
k1<br />
f k ′∗<br />
2<br />
f k ′∗<br />
3<br />
+two permutations ) ,<br />
(4.11a)<br />
G 2 (k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 ) = −2i (k 1 ·k 2 +two permutations) dηa 2 ǫ 2 1fk ∗ 1<br />
fk ∗ 2<br />
fk ∗ 3<br />
, (4.11b)<br />
η i<br />
∫ [<br />
ηe<br />
(k1 )<br />
]<br />
G 3 (k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 ) = −2i dηa 2 ǫ 2 ·k 2<br />
1 fk ∗ 1<br />
f k ′∗<br />
2<br />
f k ′∗<br />
3<br />
+five permutations , (4.11c)<br />
η i<br />
G 4 (k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 ) = i<br />
G 5 (k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 ) = i 2<br />
G 6 (k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 ) = i 2<br />
∫ ηe<br />
k 2 2<br />
∫ ηe<br />
(<br />
f<br />
∗<br />
k1<br />
f ∗ k 2<br />
f ′∗<br />
k 3<br />
+two permutations ) ,<br />
dηa 2 ǫ 1 ǫ ′ 2<br />
η i<br />
∫ [<br />
ηe<br />
(k1 )<br />
dηa 2 ǫ 3 ·k 2<br />
1<br />
η i<br />
k2<br />
2<br />
∫ {<br />
ηe<br />
[k ]<br />
2<br />
1 (k 2 ·k 3 )<br />
η i<br />
dηa 2 ǫ 3 1<br />
k 2 2 k2 3<br />
f ∗ k 1<br />
f ′∗<br />
k 2<br />
f ′∗<br />
k 3<br />
+five permutations<br />
f ∗ k 1<br />
f ′∗<br />
k 2<br />
f ′∗<br />
k 3<br />
+two permutations<br />
]<br />
(4.11d)<br />
, (4.11e)<br />
}<br />
, (4.11f)<br />
whereǫ 2 is the second slow roll parameter that is defined with respect to the first through<br />
the expression (1.8). The lower limit of the above integrals, viz. η i , denotes a sufficiently<br />
early time when the initial conditions [say, the Bunch-Davies conditions (1.23)] are imposed<br />
on the modes f k . The additional, seventh term G 7 (k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 ) arises due to a field<br />
redefinition (in this context, see, Refs. [49, 51, 53]), and its contribution to G(k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 ) is<br />
given by<br />
G 7 (k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 ) = ǫ 2(η e )<br />
2<br />
(<br />
|fk2 (η e )| 2 |f k3 (η e )| 2 +two permutations ) . (4.12)<br />
4.3 The numerical computation of the scalar bi-spectrum<br />
In this section, after illustrating that the super-Hubble contributions to the complete bispectrum<br />
during inflation proves to be negligible, we shall outline the methods that we<br />
adopt to numerically evolve the equations governing the background and the perturbations,<br />
and eventually evaluate the inflationary scalar power and bi-spectra. Also, we shall<br />
illustrate the extent of accuracy of the numerical methods by comparing them with the<br />
expected form of the bi-spectrum in the equilateral limit in power law inflation and the<br />
analytical results that are available in the case of the Starobinsky model [54, 55].<br />
4.3.1 The contributions to the bi-spectrum on super-Hubble scales<br />
It is clear from the above expressions that the evaluation of the bi-spectrum involves<br />
integrals over the mode f k and its derivative f ′ k as well as the slow roll parameters ǫ 1,<br />
65