07.01.2014 Views

PHYS08200605006 D.K. Hazra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS08200605006 D.K. Hazra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS08200605006 D.K. Hazra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 5. THE SCALAR BI-SPECTRUM DURING PREHEATING<br />

instance, Ref. [114]). The Mathieu equation possesses unstable solutions that are known<br />

to grow rapidly when the values of the parameters fall in certain domains known as the<br />

resonant bands. As discussed in detail in Refs. [60, 63], sinceq ≪ 1 in the situation of our<br />

interest, one falls in the narrow resonance regime. In such a case, the first instability band<br />

is delineated by the condition 1−q < A k < 1+q, which turns out to be equivalent to the<br />

condition<br />

0 < k a < √ 3Hm. (5.15)<br />

It should be emphasized here that the time evolution of the quantities A k and q are such<br />

that, once a mode has entered the resonance band, it remains inside it during the entire<br />

oscillatory phase.<br />

Note that, in Eq. (5.11), we can neglect the term involvingk 2 providedk 2 /(m 2 a 2 ) ≪ 1.<br />

This condition can be rewritten as<br />

( ) 2 k H 2<br />

≪ 1. (5.16)<br />

aH m2 On the other hand, the condition to fall in the first instability band, viz. Eq. (5.15), can be<br />

expressed as [63]<br />

( ) 2 k H<br />

≪ 1. (5.17)<br />

aH 3m<br />

Given that, H < m immediately after inflation, it is evident that the first of the above two<br />

conditions will be satisfied if the second is. In other words, being in the first instability<br />

band implies that one can indeed neglect the k 2 term in Eq. (5.11). But, clearly, this is<br />

completely equivalent to ignoring the k 2 term in the original equation (1.16). Therefore,<br />

we can conclude that, provided we fall in the first instability band (which is the case for<br />

the range of modes and parameters of our interest), it is perfectly valid to work with the<br />

super-Hubble solution (5.9) even during the preheating phase.<br />

The above conclusion can also supported by the following arguments. As discussed<br />

in Ref. [63], in the first instability band, the Floquet index is given by µ = q/2. In such a<br />

case, the mode V k behaves as V k ∝ e µσ . However, in the situation of our interest, since<br />

we have a time dependent Floquet index, the corresponding solution can be written as<br />

(∫<br />

V k (η) ∝ exp<br />

)<br />

µdσ ∝ a 3/2 (5.18)<br />

which, in turn, implies that v k = V k /a 1/2 ∝ a. Further, since, f k = v k /z and z ∝ a during<br />

preheating (i.e. if one makes use of the fact that ǫ 1 = 3/2 on the average), we arrive at<br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!