07.01.2014 Views

PHYS08200605006 D.K. Hazra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS08200605006 D.K. Hazra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS08200605006 D.K. Hazra - Homi Bhabha National Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.3. THE NUMERICAL COMPUTATION OF THE SCALAR BI-SPECTRUM<br />

The various contributions<br />

To begin with, note that, each of the integrals G C<br />

(k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 ), where C = (1,6), can be<br />

divided into two parts as follows:<br />

G C<br />

(k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 ) = G is<br />

C (k 1,k 2 ,k 3 )+G se<br />

C (k 1,k 2 ,k 3 ). (4.16)<br />

The integrals in the first term G is<br />

C (k 1,k 2 ,k 3 ) run from the earliest time (i.e. η i ) when the<br />

smallest of the three wavenumbers k 1 , k 2 and k 3 is sufficiently inside the Hubble radius<br />

[typically corresponding to k/(aH) ≃ 100] to the time (say, η s ) when the largest of the<br />

three wavenumbers is well outside the Hubble radius [say, when k/(aH) ≃ 10 −5 ]. Then,<br />

evidently, the second term G se<br />

C (k 1,k 2 ,k 3 ) will involve integrals which run from the latter<br />

time η s to the end of inflation at η e . In what follows, we shall discuss the various<br />

contributions to the bi-spectrum due to the terms G se<br />

C (k 1,k 2 ,k 3 ). We shall show that the<br />

corresponding contribution either remains small or, when it proves to be large, it is exactly<br />

canceled by another contribution to the bi-spectrum.<br />

The contributions due to the fourth and the seventh terms<br />

Let us first focus on the<br />

fourth term G 4 (k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 ) since it has often been found to lead to the largest contribution<br />

to the bi-spectrum when deviations from slow roll occur [53, 54, 55]. As the slow roll<br />

parameters turn large towards the end of inflation, we can expect this term to contribute<br />

significantly at late times. However, as we shall quickly illustrate, such a late time contribution<br />

is exactly canceled by the contribution from G 7 (k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 ) which arises due to the<br />

field redefinition.<br />

Upon using the form (4.14) of the mode f k and its derivative (4.15) on super-Hubble<br />

scales in the expression (4.11d), one obtains that<br />

G se<br />

4 (k 1,k 2 ,k 3 ) ≃ i ( A ∗ k 1<br />

A ∗ k 2<br />

¯B∗ k3<br />

+ two permutations ) ∫ η e<br />

This expression can be trivially integrated to yield<br />

η s<br />

dη ǫ ′ 2 . (4.17)<br />

G se<br />

4 (k 1,k 2 ,k 3 ) ≃ i ( A ∗ k 1<br />

A ∗ k 2<br />

¯B∗ k3<br />

+ two permutations ) [ǫ 2 (η e )−ǫ 2 (η s )], (4.18)<br />

so that the corresponding contribution to the bi-spectrum can be expressed as<br />

[<br />

G se<br />

4 (k 1,k 2 ,k 3 ) ≃ iM 2 [ǫ<br />

Pl 2 (η e )−ǫ 2 (η s )] |A k1 | 2 |A k2 | 2( )<br />

A k3<br />

¯B∗ k3<br />

−A ∗ ¯Bk3 k 3<br />

]<br />

+ two permutations . (4.19)<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!