13.01.2014 Views

“Being Neutral is Our Biggest Crime” - Global Coalition to Protect ...

“Being Neutral is Our Biggest Crime” - Global Coalition to Protect ...

“Being Neutral is Our Biggest Crime” - Global Coalition to Protect ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A woman from Nendra said she saw the police take away her s<strong>is</strong>ter in 2006. As of<br />

December 2007 there was no news of her whereabouts. The guidelines <strong>is</strong>sued by the<br />

Supreme Court of India in D.K. Basu’s case state that the relatives or friends of a<br />

detainee have the right <strong>to</strong> know the location where a detainee <strong>is</strong> being held. Since<br />

the police did not d<strong>is</strong>close any information about the fate of the detainee or the<br />

location, the detention <strong>is</strong> considered an enforced d<strong>is</strong>appearance under international<br />

law. 138 Describing how her s<strong>is</strong>ter was taken away, the eyewitness said,<br />

When they [police] came the second time, my s<strong>is</strong>ter and I were picking<br />

[vegetables] in the fields. Police came and I just managed <strong>to</strong> run away.<br />

When I turned around and saw, they had caught my younger s<strong>is</strong>ter and<br />

she was being taken away. She was about 16 or 17 years old then. I did<br />

not wait <strong>to</strong> see anything else because I was scared and I kept running.<br />

She did not come back at all…. We have no news of her until <strong>to</strong>day. On<br />

the same day they <strong>to</strong>ok 10 people from old Nendra. I knew one of<br />

them—Veko Dhula, about 50 years old. I do not know the others<br />

personally. We heard that they were taken <strong>to</strong> the Errabore police<br />

station but after that we do not know what happened <strong>to</strong> them. We<br />

have had no news of these 10 people. 139<br />

C. Failure of the government <strong>to</strong> investigate abuses<br />

Even though Chhatt<strong>is</strong>garh state government officials maintain that they “are<br />

committed <strong>to</strong> the Rule of Law” and “[t]here <strong>is</strong> no failure on the part of State of<br />

Chhatt<strong>is</strong>garh [<strong>to</strong> investigate] and therefore independent investigation <strong>is</strong> uncalled for<br />

and unwarranted,” 140 police and other state government officials were unable <strong>to</strong><br />

provide Human Rights Watch with any information regarding the investigation or<br />

prosecution of members of government security forces or Salwa Judum for human<br />

rights abuses and crimes. Several NGO fact-finding teams have exposed these<br />

138 See International Convention for the <strong>Protect</strong>ion of All Persons from Enforced D<strong>is</strong>appearance, adopted September 23, 2005,<br />

E/CN.4/2005/WG.22/WP.1/Rev.4 (2005). India signed but has yet <strong>to</strong> ratify the convention.<br />

139 Human Rights Watch interview with Modiyam Geeta (pseudonym), IDP from Nendra, village K10, Khammam d<strong>is</strong>trict,<br />

December 7, 2007.<br />

140 Nandini Sundar and others v. State of Chhatt<strong>is</strong>garh, Sur-Rejoinder on Behalf of Respondent State of Chhatt<strong>is</strong>garh, April 10,<br />

2008, p. 519, para. 15.<br />

“Being <strong>Neutral</strong> <strong>is</strong> <strong>Our</strong> <strong>Biggest</strong> Crime” 58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!