âBeing Neutral is Our Biggest Crimeâ - Global Coalition to Protect ...
âBeing Neutral is Our Biggest Crimeâ - Global Coalition to Protect ...
âBeing Neutral is Our Biggest Crimeâ - Global Coalition to Protect ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
[forest department] wanted <strong>to</strong> shift them [IDPs] <strong>to</strong> a place in Nalgonda<br />
where there are no forests and it would have been very difficult for<br />
them <strong>to</strong> survive. We negotiated with them [officials] and finally<br />
convinced them <strong>to</strong> take them [IDPs] <strong>to</strong> Bhadrachalam instead of<br />
Nalgonda. 292<br />
A senior police official from Andhra Pradesh confirmed that the police do not reg<strong>is</strong>ter<br />
complaints against the forest department because they are performing their duties<br />
under the law:<br />
IDPs make complaints against the forest department. Strictly speaking<br />
these are not complaints and we do not reg<strong>is</strong>ter them. We can’t<br />
reg<strong>is</strong>ter complaints against the forest department because they are<br />
authorized <strong>to</strong> evict encroachers. We try <strong>to</strong> find via media [middle<br />
ground] and tell the forest department that they cannot be very harsh<br />
on the IDPs. 293<br />
After enduring repeated forced relocation for over two years, in mid-2007 local NGOs<br />
ass<strong>is</strong>ted d<strong>is</strong>placed persons in petitioning the Andhra Pradesh High Court for its<br />
intervention. 294 The court passed interim orders in September 2007: “the<br />
respondents [forest department officials] are directed not <strong>to</strong> demol<strong>is</strong>h or set fire the<br />
huts, if any, of the Petitioners.” 295 Local NGOs and the petitioners’ counsel informed<br />
Human Rights Watch that the court-granted relief was merely temporary—they feared<br />
that forest department officials would recommence their punitive actions if the High<br />
Court’s interim orders were vacated. 296<br />
292 Human Rights Watch group interview with local villagers (who chose <strong>to</strong> remain anonymous), Warangal d<strong>is</strong>trict, November<br />
29, 2007.<br />
293 Human Rights Watch interview with a senior police official S4 (who requested anonymity), location withheld, December 5,<br />
2007.<br />
294 Madkam Nandaiah and others v. Forest Range Officer, Konnavaram, Khammam d<strong>is</strong>trict and others, Writ Petition No. 19594<br />
of 2007, Vanjam Kannaiah and others v. Forest Range Officer, V.R.Puram, Khammam d<strong>is</strong>trict and others, Writ Petition No.<br />
19571 of 2007, Thurram Muthaiah and another v. Forest Range Officer, Chin<strong>to</strong>or, Khammam and others, Writ Petition No.<br />
19599 of 2007. In these petitions, the evictions have been challenged as being violative of the tribal communities’ rights<br />
under Indian forestry laws.<br />
295 Ibid, interim orders, September 27, 2007.<br />
296 Human Rights Watch interviews with K. Balagopal, Human Rights Forum, Hyderabad, November 27, 2007 (first interview);<br />
Dr. Haneef, Sitara Organization, Chinturu, December 4, 2007 (first interview).<br />
91<br />
Human Rights Watch July 2008